US ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SEATTLE DISTRICT, PO BOX 3755, SEATTLE WA 98124-2255

C -- ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF HANGAR DESIGN FOR WA, OR, ID & MT, C-17 BEDDOWN PROGRAM, MCCHORD AFB, WA SOL DACA67-96-R-0015 DUE 010496 POC Contract Specialist John Norway (206) 764-6659 (Site Code DACA67) 1. Contract Information: Work and services may consist of the design for Air Force air field paving work, hydrant fueling system work and various utility work in support of the Seattle District's assigned military design program in various fiscal years. The project will generally be in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho & Montana. This will be the only announcement for the design of hangar facilities for the Seattle District during the next 12 months, unless a project is identified during that time frame which has significantly different features from what is described below. NOTE: This is an advanced selection in anticipation of upcoming projects. The selection will remain open for 12 months after the date the selection is approved. A separate firm-fixed-price contract will be negotiated and awarded from each project. A list of at least three firms will be selected. When a design authorization for the first project of this type is received, negotiations will begin with the top ranked firm. When authorization is received for a subsequent project, or if negotiations with a firm for a project are unsuccessful, negotiations will begin with the next ranked firm that has not been offered a project for negotiation. If the list of ranked firms is exhausted, the negotiation cycle will begin again with the top ranked firm. None of the projects have been authorized for design and funds are not presently available for any contracts. This announcement is open to all businesses regardless of size. All interested Architect-Engineers are reminded that in accordance with the provisions of PL 95-507, they will be expected to place subcontracts to the maximum practicable extent consistent with the efficient performance of the contract with small and small disadvantaged firms. If a large business is selected for this project, it must comply with the FAR 52.219-9 clause regarding the requirement for a subcontracting plan on that part of the work it intends to subcontract. The recommended goal for the work intended to be subcontracted is 60.3% for small business. It furtherstates that out of that 60.3%, 9.8% for small disadvantaged business and 2.9% is for small business/woman owned. A firm that submits a plan with lesser goals must submit written rationale to support goals submitted. The detailed plan is not required to be submitted with SF 255 but will be prepared for each project prior to award. However, this eventual requirement should be taken into consideration when assembling the teams for the SF 255. This work will include all architectural/engineering and related services necessary to complete the design, and related services during construction for these projects. 2. PROJECT INFORMATION: These contracts may include the design of heating/heat distribution systems, electrical, sanitary and storm drainage systems, hydrant fueling systems and pavements (airfield and roadway). Base-wide utility studies may also be required. Some projects may require design in the metric system. Firms must also have the capability to deal with corrosion protection design (NACE certified) be knowledgeable of possible environmental issues and construction/operational permitting and have access to surveying and goe-technical disciplines. Partnering on some projects may be required. The estimated construction costs per project range form $1,000,000 to $20,000,000. The selected AEs will be required to provide drawings on mylar as well as electronic data and/or compatible with vectorized Autocad format (latest version). 3. SELECTION CRITERIA: The selection criteria are listed below in descending order of importance (first by major criteriton and then by each sub-criterion). Criteria a-d are primary. Criteria e-g are secondary and will only be used as ''tie-breakers'' among technically equal firms. a. Specialized recent experience in the required work and technical competence in: (1) Design of new and alteration of hangar type projects utilizing Air Force criteria. b. Qualified professional personnel in the following key disciplines: project management, architecture, electrical, mechanical, civil, structural and estimating; certified industrial hygienist; and corrosion engineering and fire protection. c. Past performance of DoD and other contracts with respect to cost control, quality of work, compliance with performance schedules and ease of negotiations. d. Capability of the firm to accomplish work in the required time frame including professional qualifications of firm's staf and consultants to be assigned to the projects which are necessary for satisfactory performance in the required services. (1) The breadth and size of a firm will be considered to match the complexity/simplicity of the proposed project. e. Volume of DoD contract awards in the last 12 months. f. Geographic proximity to the Seattle District boundaries. g. Participation of small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, historically black colleges and universities and minority institutions measured as a percentage of the estimated effort. 4. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Architect-Engineer firms having capabilities to perform this work are invited to submit one completed Standard Form 255, US Government Architect-Engineer and Related Services Questionnaire for Specific Project, and one completed SF 254 for themselves and each of subcontractors to the office shown above. In Block 7 of the SF 255, provide resumes for all key team members, whether with the prime firm or subcontractor. In Block 9 of the SF 255, responding firms must indicate the number and amount of DoD (Army, Navy, Air Force) contracts awarded in the 12 months prior to this notice, including change orders and supplemental agreements. In Block 10 of the SF 255, describe the firm's quality control plan including coordination of subcontractors. Responses received by the close of business on the closing date will be considered for selection. If the closing date is a Saturday, Sunday or Federal holiday, the deadline is the close of the next business day. No other notification to firms under consideration for this project will be made and no further action is required. All responsible sources may submit the required SF 254 and 255 which shall be considered by the agency. This is not a request for(0338)

Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0012 19951205\C-0003.SOL)