|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF DECEMBER 27,1995 PSA#1498SOUTHWESTNAVFACENGCOM (Code 0211), 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA
92132-5187 C -- A-E SERVICES FOR A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN &
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH NEPA,
NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION (NAWS), CHINA LAKE, CALIFORNIA SOL
N68711-96-C-2089 DUE 013096 POC Samantha Darella/Contract Specialist,
(619) 532-3839, Nancy Trent/Contracting Officer, (619) 532-2853. Firm
Fixed Price. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for the
preparation of a comprehensive Land Use Management Plan and an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document in compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and other federal and state
regulations, for existing and proposed Range and support activity
operations at Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS) China Lake, California,
and associated ranges. The estimated start date is April 1996. The
estimated completion date is August 1997. China Lake operations and
land uses include: research and development, test and evaluation
laboratory, range for air warfare weapons and weapons systems, high
hazard training area for aerial gunnery, rocketry, electronic warfare
and countermeasures, tactical maneuvering and air support, and other
defense related activities. Other land uses include, geothermal
development and related power production activities, operation of an
air field, operation of an industrial complex and associated support
activities, residential use areas and management programs for land
based resource values. Environmental planning services and the
incorporation of planning documents for administration, training, and
air facilities are required for NEPA compliance documentation that
encompasses a myriad of environmental and community planning
requirements such as: California Desert Protection Act compliance,
Federal Land Policy and Management Act compliance, Endangered Species
Act compliance, Clean Air Act Conformity, National Historic
Preservation Act compliance, Archeological Resources Protection Act
compliance, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act compliance, Clean
Water Act Compliance. Extensive public involvement will be necessary,
and presentation to other agencies and the public will be required.
NAWS China Lake requires the completion of a comprehensive Land Use
Management Plan by June 1996. The Land Use Management Plan will provide
alternatives to be considere in the EIS that allow for varying
intensities of use of China Lake lands. Other alternatives identified
during the EIS scoping process would also need to be addressed in the
EIS. Other studies currently under preparation by NAWS China Lake
include a Range Management Plan, Natural Resources Management Plan, and
a Historic Archeological Resources Protection Plan. These studies will
be available to assist in the preparation of the EIS. Anticipated
environmental issues include potential impacts to air quality,
biological resources, cultural resources, land use compatibility and
noise impacts to the surrounding communities. All documentation and
services shall be performed in accordance with NEPA and the Department
of the Navy implementing regulations. A-E selection criteria will
include (in order of importance): (1) Recent specialized experience of
the firm (including subconsultants) in the preparation of
environmental documentation in compliance with NEPA for military
operations within the desert environments. Do not list more than a
total of 10 projects in Block 8. Include point of contact name and
phone number in Block 8c for each project listed. Indicate which
consultants from the proposed team, if any, participated in the
preparation of planning documentation for each project. (2)
Professional qualifications of the staff to be assigned to the project
will include professional and technical support with experience and
knowledge in the preparation of federal NEPA documentation and
demonstrated expertise in desert biological and cultural resources,
woodland biological resources, noise and air quality analyses, ordnance
(including explosives, artillery, and missiles) characteristics and
issues, range land use planning, and public relations. List only the
team members who will actually perform major tasks (including field
surveys and report writing) under this project and their qualifications
which should reflect the individual's potential contribution to this
project. (3) Past performance on contracts with government agencies and
private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work and
compliance with performance schedules. Indicate by briefly describing
internal quality assurance and cost control procedures and indicate
team members who are responsible for monitoring these processes. List
recent awards, commendations and other performance evaluations (do not
submit copies). (4) Location in the general geographic area of the
project and knowledge of the locality of the project, provided that the
application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of firms
given the nature and size of this project. (5) Capacity to accomplish
the work in the required time. Indicate the firms present workload and
the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the
specified contract performance period and indicate specialized
equipment available and prior security clearances. (6) The firm's
quality control program with demonstrated results in the performance of
quality control on prior Department of Defense contracts. (7) List the
small or disadvantaged or woman-owned business firms used as primary
consultants or as subconsultants. If a large business concern is
selected for this contract, they will be required to submit a
subcontracting plan that should reflect a minimum 5% Small
Disadvantaged Business of the amount to be subcontracted out. Those
firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement and
wish to be considered, must submit one copy each of a SF 254 and a SF
255 for the firm and a SF 254 for each consultant listed in block 6 of
the firms SF 255. One copy of the submittal package is to be received
in this office no later than 3:00 P.M. Pacific Time on the due date
indicated above. Should the due date fall on a weekend or holiday, the
submittal package will be due the first workday there after.
Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered.
Additional information requested of applying firms: indicate
solicitation number in block 2b, CEC (Contractor Establishment Code)
and/or Duns number (for the address listed in block 3) and TIN number
in block 3, telefax number (if any) in block 3a and discuss why the
firm is especially qualified based on the selection criteria in block
10 of the SF 255. For firms applying with multiple offices, indicate
the office which completed each of the projects listed in block 8 and
list which office is under contract for any contracts listed in block
9. Use block 10 of the SF 255 to provide any additional information
desired. Personal interviews may not be scheduled prior to selection of
the most highly qualified firm. SF 255's shall not exceed 30 printed
pages (double sided is two pages/organizational charts and photographs
excluded, exception: photographs with text will be considered as a
page). Al information must be included on the SF 255 (cover letter,
other attachments and pages in excess of the 30 page limit will not be
included in the evaluation process). Firms not providing the requested
information in the format (i.e. listing more than a total of 10
projects in block 8, not providing a brief description of the quality
control plan, not listing which office of multiple office firms
completed projects listed in block 8, etc.) directed by this synopsis
may be negatively evaluated under selection criteria (3). Firms, their
subsidiaries or affiliates, which design or prepare specifications for
a construction contract or procurement of supplies cannot provide the
construction or supplies. Firms which design or prepare specifications
for a construction or procurement of supplies cannot provide the
construction or supplies. Firms which prepare NEPA documentation cannot
participate in the concurrent design/ construction management contract.
This limitation also applies to subsidiaries and affiliates of the
firm. This is not a request for proposal. Telegraphic and facsimile SF
255's will not be accepted. Site visits will not be arranged during
the submittal period. See Numbered Note(s): 24. (0356) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0016 19951226\C-0009.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|