|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 16,1996 PSA#1533R&D Contracting, Bldg 7, 2530 C Street, WPAFB OH 45433-7607 A -- ACTIVE AEROLASTIC WING TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM. THIS
ANNOUNCEMENT IS IN TWO PARTS. THIS IS PART 1 OF 2 SOL PRDA 96-01 FIK
POC Mr. Raleigh Haney, Contract Negotiator, (513) 255-5901 Mr. Lawrence
W. Kopa, Contracting Officer, (513) 255-5901. INTRODUCTION: - THIS
ANNOUNCEMENT IS IN TWO PARTS. THIS IS PART 1 OF 2. The purpose of this
notice is to solicit proposals on the PRDA which is available upon
request from the technical point of contact listed below. The following
is a brief description of the Active Aeroelastic Wing Technology Flight
Research Program.Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW):Wright Laboratory
(WL/FIBGE) is interested in receiving proposals (technical and cost) to
design fabricate (modify an existing fighter aircraft) and perform
limited flight test support of a wing system that employs outboard
control surfaces to alter the root to tip lift distribution by twisting
the wing. Comments received in response to draft PRDA 96-01 (published
MARCH 1995) have been incorporated as appropriate. Proposals submitted
in response to this PRDA shall be submitted by April 1, 1996, 1500
hours, Eastern Time, addressed to Wright Laboratory, R&D Contracting
Directorate, Building 7, Area B, Attn: (Mr. Raleigh Haney, WL/FIK),
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7607. Small businesses may propose on
all or any part of this solicitation. Proposal submission after the
cutoff date and time specified herein shall be treated in accordance
with restrictions of FAR 52.215-10. A copy of this provision may be
obtained from the contracting point of contact. There will be no other
solicitation issued in regard to this requirement. Offerors should be
alert for any PRDA amendments that may permit subsequent submission of
proposal dates. Offerors who do not already have a copy of the current
Nov 92 WL guide entitled ''PRDA BAA Guide for Industry'' should
request a copy from the contracting focal point above. This guide is
specifically designed to assist offerors in understanding the PRDA/BAA
proposal process. Potential offerors should request a supplemental
package to this PRDA. The supplemental package may be requested from
the Engineering POC at the above address. The supplemental package
contains an engineering guide, list of procedures and guidance for use
of government furnished property, equipment and facilities, and ground
testing, a sample Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), and contract data
list requirements. B-REQUIREMENTS: The objective of the AAW program is
to produce flight test verified design criteria for a wing system that
is significantly lighter weight than current supersonic fighters while
improving controllability and aerodynamic efficiency. (1) Technical
Description: Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW) Technology is a
multidisciplinary, synergistic technology that integrates air vehicle
aerodynamics, controls, and structures together to maximize air vehicle
performance by taking advantage of higher aspect ratio, thinner
flexible wings that are aeroelastically deformed into shapes for
optimum performance. AAW technology uses wing aeroelastic flexibility
for a net benefit. Wing control surfaces are used as tabs that promote
wing twist instead of the current practice of adding stiffness trying
to negate it. The power of the air stream is employed to twist the
wing with very little control surface motion. The wing creates the
control forces in AAW technology. Using AAW technology, large control
power may be generated across the supersonic fighter aircraft Mach
rangeenvelope that can be used for multiple purposes such as twisting
and cambering the wing into a shape for: minimum drag at multiple
flight conditions, to minimize structural loads, and to provide control
power for rolling or pitching the air vehicle. To date, Active
Aeroelastic Wing Technology has been demonstrated through analysis and
wind tunnel modeling. A full scale flight demonstration utilizing a
current light-weight high performance jet fighter is required to
simulate the applicable Reynolds Numbers and high acceleration
maneuvering effects. Successful completion of the flight test is
required to mature the basic technology and provide aircraft designers
with the confidence to use the technology in future designs. The major
goal of this program is to conduct a flight test experiment that
validates the full scale flight characteristics and benefits of Active
Aeroelastic Wing Technology. The program will be accomplished by
incorporating AAW technology on a full scale fighter aircraft testbed
and flight testing the aircraft within its existing envelope.
Development of Active Aeroelastic Wing Technology requires the
integration of structures, flight controls, and aerodynamic
technologies to obtain significant synergistic improvements. The
contractor is encouraged to make recommendations to reduce program
costs concerning all portions of the effort. The following program
approach has been formulated to take advantage of current expertise and
facilities in the government and industry. This contract will design,
fabricate, modify an available supersonic fighter aircraft, and provide
flight test support of the modified portion of the aircraft during
flight testing. NASA Dryden Flight Research Center will perform the
flight testing with support from the Air Force Flight Test Center
(AFFTC) at Edwards AFB, CA. The testbed aircraft will be delivered to
the contractor facility by the government. The contractor will modify
the selected aircraft at his facilities and ferry it to Edwards AFB, CA
for flight testing. The contractor should select a supersonic aircraft
that can be made available for the program on a cost effective basis,
it should have a digital flight control system to facilitate cost
efective integration with the AAW control system module which should be
adaptable to the flight test learning process, should be capable of
high dynamic pressure flight testing, and have instrumentation
compatible with the NASA Dryden test range. Arrangements are now being
made to make the NASA HARV F-18 and a NASA F-16 aircraft available for
the AAW program. If any other aircraft is selected by the contractor,
the contractor should investigate its availability and notify WL/FIBGE
as soon as possible. (2) Deliverable Items: (a) Data and Reports:
CDRL's of the supplemental package are provided as a guide to the
contractor. It is the intent to permit the contractor to exercise
considerable freedom in providing the minimum documentation to satisfy
the requirements of the participating government organizations.
Minimum documentation shall be as follows: reports to track contractor
progress versus expenditures, design criteria for applying AAW
technologies to flight vehicle designs giving reduced weight, increased
controllability, and improved aerodynamic efficiency, documentation to
operate the modified aircraft in a safe manner, and modification to
appropriate manuals for maintaining the AAW testbed aircraft during
flight tests. The CDRL's contain much more than this and the contractor
should make recommendations as to which of these can be eliminated,
e.g. the contractor will not be required to demod the testbed
aircraft., (b) Hardware Deliverables: The contractor shall modify a GFP
aircraft with control surfaces, actuators, skins, structural
components, hydraulics, electrical system, computers etc., to provide
a versatile AAW flight test aircraft capable of flight experimentation
over the supersonic fighter aircraft flight envelop in sufficient
thoroughness to validate the AAW technologies for application to future
and current fighter aircraft (See flight test plan working group
results). (c) Software Deliverables: The contractor shall design and
program the AAW control software so that the operation of the testbed
will prove that an integrated AAW flight vehicle can be designed to
meet future fighter aircraft mission requirements. This may require
reprogramming some of the basic flight control system software. The
contractor will be required to provide data for the NASA Dryden flight
training and planning simulation but it is anticipated that the actual
simulation software programming will be provided by NASA. (3) Security
Requirements: Security protection and classification requirements will
be consistent with hardware to be modified during the program and
performance capabilties used in comparing AAW attributes. Telemetry and
data handling must be consistent with the protection and encryption
needed at Edwards AFB. The AAW technology is unclassified but will have
distribution limited to government agencies and their contractors and
export control data protection from disclosure to foreign countries
without approval from the U.S. State Department. The contractor may
require access to classified information at the secret level and each
requirement shall be approved on a case by case basis. (4) Other
Requirements: Tentatively the following formal oral reviews are planned
and should be preceded by appropriate documentation: Preliminary Design
Review (PDR) Apr. 97, Critical Design Review (CDR) May 98, and Flight
Readiness Review (FRR) Aug 99. The date and location of these reviews
will be adjusted to fit the contractors work process on a cost
effective basis. The attending government teams will submit formal
Requests For Action (RFA's) which the contractor will be required to
explain or perform the requested action. In general ground test
facilities will be provided by the government but in some cases it may
be more cost effective for the contractor to perform some of these
tests in his facilities. Offerors should obtain the list of procedures
and guidance for use of government furnished property, equipment and
facilities, and ground testing in the supplemental package and make a
cost effective selection as to which of the following are required and
where they should be performed: Wind Tunnel Tests, Simulations, Wing
Proof Load Tests, Ground Vibration Tests, and any other tests deemed
necessary. It is anticipated that the Verification and Validation (V&V)
will be performed by the contractor in conjunction with NASA Dryden at
Edwards AFB, CA if the contractor can arrange to perform a minimum
checkout of the basic reversion mod at his facility for ferry flight to
Edwards AFB, CA. The contractor shall provide a brief flight test plan
after the design is complete to show the extent to which the
supersonic fighter envelope can be investigated by the AAW Test
Aircraft. C-ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: (1) Anticipated Period of
Performance: 1 Sep 96 through 1 Jul 01. (2) Expected Award Date: 4 Jul
96. (3) Government Estimate: The Air Force funding profile is
estimated to be as follows: FY96 $100k, fy97 $1.1M, FY98 $3,1m, fy99
$3.5M, FY00 $2.0m, FY01 $2.0M. THIS IS THE END OF PART 1. (0045) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0001 19960215\A-0001.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|