|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 22,1996 PSA#1536Navy Public Works Center, 9742 Maryland Avenue, Norfolk, VA 23511-3095,
Attn: Facilities Contracting Department, A&E Management Division, Code
022 C -- INDEFINITE QUANTITY A&E CONTRACT FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
SERVICES AT NAVAL BASE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA AND OTHER INSTALLATIONS SOL
N00187-95-R-7953. Contact Mr. Robert A. Lemon, PE., Contracting
Officer, 804/444-4200. Services are required to perform structural
engineering including design, preparation of plans, specifications, and
cost estimates, related studies and all associated engineering for
alteration and repair projects. Typical projects may involve the
following; repair/alteration/replacement/new of floors, roofs, walls,
industrial doors, slabs, foundations, columns, supports, frames,
abutments, manhole type structures, bridges, quay walls, piers,
bulkheads, retaining structures, storage tanks, and other similar
projects of a structural nature. Types of structures may be personnel
support facilities such as barracks, gymnasiums, administration
buildings, recreation facilities, family housing, etc., and industrial
type facilities such as shop buildings, warehouses, small plants,
maintenance buildings, etc. A seed project has not been designated for
this indefinite quantity contract. The type of contract is firm fixed
price. The total contract amount cannot exceed $500,000 fee in twelve
months, with the estimated construction costs of most projects
normally $100,000 to $1,000,000. Studies normally are in the $10,000 to
$50,000 fee range. The duration of this contract is one year from date
of award. There is a one year Government option requiring the same
basic structural engineering skills. The Government reserves an option
to award construction inspection services. The firm must demonstrate
its and each key consultant's qualifications with respect to the
established evaluation factors as stated herein. Evaluation factors (1)
through (5) are of equal importance; factors (6) through (9) are of
lesser importance, but will be used to assist in the selection,
especially should one or more firms be essentially equally qualified
for Factors (1) through (5). Specific evaluation factors are: (1)
Professional qualifications and technical competence of the designated
project team: Firms will be evaluated in terms of; (a) Project team
(includes consultants) experience involving structural engineering
projects of a size and type commensurate with those anticipated for
this contract (include an individual's experience with this firm or
other firms provided it is relevant). (b) Project team's knowledge of
the general area of Naval Base Norfolk and Southeastern Virginia in
terms of codes, laws, permit requirements, construction materials,
general practices, topography and subsurface conditions, as
demonstrated by previous project experience. (c) Project team's active
professional registrations and/or certifications in their individual
area of expertise. (d) Specific involvement of each team member in the
relevant projects listed in Block 8 of the SF 255 (if the firm has
multiple office locations, the location of the design team members must
be identified) (also, if several offices will contribute to the project
team and one particular office will serve as the project office,
explain how the various team members will perform the task required, if
they are not all relocated to the project office during the performance
of this contract). (E) Designation of back-up personnel (include
consultants) and their qualifications. (2) Firm Qualifications:
Evaluation will be made in terms of; (a) Recent structural engineering
project experience (1990-1995) similar to the type of work as required
by this contract and as explained previously (be as specific as you can
in providing your information, including dates and location). (b)
Involvement of management personnel with this contract and their
continuity with the firm. (c) AutoCAD Release 13 or higher format
capability. (3) Ability to accomplish the work; (a) Demonstrated
ability to accomplish similar projects as anticipated for this contract
in a 3-4 month time frame after award (give specific examples). (B)
Demonstrated ability to manage multiple projects at various stages of
design while maintaining quality and meeting established completion
schedules. (4) Past performance: Firms will be evaluated in terms of;
(a) Cost estimating ability as demonstrated by comparison of structural
engineering design cost estimates with the low bid on similar size and
type design projects (give specific examples) (show costs, and the
difference as a percentage). (b) Ability to prepare cost estimates in
the computerized CES format, and specifications using SPECSINTACT. (C)
Experience with projects involving metric measure (give specific
examples). (d) Demonstrated long term relationships and repeat business
with Government and private customers. (E) Performance awards received.
(5) Quality control program: Firms will be evaluated on the
acceptability of their quality control program used to ensure technical
accuracy and discipline coordination of designs, plans, specifications,
cost estimates, and reports/studies (an adequate summary of the program
is requested, please do not submit copies of the entire program). (6)
Firm's geographical location: Firms will be evaluated on geographic
location as regards to accessibility to the Naval Base Norfolk,
Virginia, and their demonstrated ability to respond to the demands of
this contract in a timely manner (provided that application of this
factor leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms). (7) Volume of
work: Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded by
DoD with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of DoD
A&E contracts among qualified firms, including small disadvantaged
business firms and firms that have not had prior DoD contracts. (8)
Primary Consultants and Sub-contractors: Firms will be evaluated on
their use of small or disadvantaged or women-owned business firms as
consultants or sub-contractors. (9) Firms will be evaluated on their
experience with projects that provide for the use of recovered
materials to achieve waste reduction, and, use of energy-efficiency in
facility designs. This ends the evaluation factors. Digital graphics
data base of site survey may be required; if so, the survey and all
drawings forming a part thereof shall be submitted in an AutoCAD
Release 13 or higher format. The contract scope may require evaluation
and definition of asbestos or lead materials and toxic waste
disposition. A&E firms meeting the requirements described in this
announcement are invited to submit completed current Standard Forms 254
(unless already on file with this office within the past 12 months) and
255, U.S. Government Architect-Engineer Qualifications, to the office
show above. In Block 10 of the SF 255 discuss why the firm is
especially qualified based on each evaluation factor given herein. All
information must be included within the SF 254 and 255; cover letters,
bindings and covers, and other attachments are discouraged and are not
considered in the evaluation process. FIRMS RESPONDING TO THIS
ANNOUNCEMENT BY CLOSE OF BUSINESS (3:45 PM EST) MARCH 29, 1996, WILL BE
CONSIDERED. Firms responding should submit only one copy of the
qualifications package. Neither hand carried nor facsimile responses
will be accepted. Courier delivered packages should be sent to
Facilities Contracting Department, A&E Management Division, First
Floor, Building Z-140, Naval Base Norfolk, Virginia. This proposed
contract is being solicited on an unrestricted basis, therefore,
replies to this notice are requested from all business concerns. Before
award of the contract, the A&E Management Division, First Floor,
Building Z-140, Naval Base Norfolk, Virginia. This proposed contract is
being solicited on an unrestricted basis, therefore, replies to this
notice are requested from all business concerns. Before award of the
contract, the A&E, if not a small business concern, shall agree in the
contract, by incorporation of an acceptable small business and small
disadvantaged business subcontracting plan, per FAR Part 19.7 that
small business concerns and small disadvantaged business concerns shall
have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in this
contract consistent with its efficient performance. The small business
size standard classification is SIC 8711 ($2,500,000). This is not a
request for proposals. Inquiries concerning this contract must mention
location and contract number. See Note 24. (051) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0025 19960221\C-0001.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|