|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 7,1996 PSA#1611U.S. Department of Education, Grants and Contracts Services, 7th & D
Streets, SW, Room 3633, ROB Washington, D.C. 20202-4337 A -- PART 1 OF 2 DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING HIGH PERFORMANCE LEARNING
COMMUNITIES SOL RC-96-1370 DUE 070596 POC Linda Feeney, 202-708-8282.
PART 1 OF 2: Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)-- Developing and
Implementing High Performance Learning Communities. U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, GSA Bldg., Room 3633, 7th and
D Streets, SW., Washington, D.C. 20202-4337. Contract Officer: Helen
Chang, 202-708-9740. I. INTRODUCTION: The United States Department of
Education (ED) requests proposals for studies on Developing and
Implementing High Performance Learning Communities. The studis shall
focus on the strategies and procedures to initiate, support, and
sustain high achievement for all students, especially those students in
high poverty schools. II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: ED will comtemplate
awarding up to three fixed-priced contracts. ED expects to award
$1,000,000 to $1,250,000 for each study in the first year; and from
$1,000,000 to $1,250,000 for each study for four additional years.
Option years are at ED's discretion and subject to the availability or
funds. There have been a number of studies on restructing schools to
support high levels of achievement for all students. Generally, these
studies enumerate common characteristics of successful restructuring
such as: an agreed upon vision of high achievement for all students by
teachers, parents, pupils and the community; core education activities
( curriculum and instruction, assessments, professional development,
after-school tutoring, etc.) oreiented toward this vision; a school
organization that helps teachers and students perform at high levels
(i.e., to think, to develop in-depth understanding, and to solve
problems); and, external support that enhances organizational capacity
ahd helps the school focus on student learning. These characteristics
generally define high performance learning communities-- communities
that successfully organize or develop the values, beliefs, and
technical skills or its members to help students achieve at high
levels. III. PURPOSE Although helpful, these general characteristics
fail to provide specific strategies and procedures to initiate, support
and maintain high performance learning communities (i.e. the school,
the surrounding community, and the school governance and policy
environment) to promote high levels of learning for all students/
Accordingly, this BAA is a call for studies to: develop prototypical
strategies and procedures, solidly grounded in theory amd empirical
evidence, to build high performance learning communities; established
partnerships with schools communities and revise the prototypes on the
basis of what is learned; and, replicate the revised prototypes in a
number or communities and report the outcomes. A publishable product
(s) must result from each year's effort. IV. SUBMISSON REQUIREMENTS: ED
will use the following submission process to evaluate proposals
submitted in response to this announcement. The offerors shall submit
an abstract of a proposal. ED will evaluate all abstracts against the
technical evaluation criteria described in this announcement. ED may
use more than one panel if needed. ED will invite full technical, past
performance, and cost proposals from offeror with the most promising
abstracts. In the invitation, ED will specify proposal format and the
representations and certifications required under the Federal
Acquisition Regulations, the Education Department Acquisition
Regulations and other ED clauses to be included in the contract(s) that
will result from the BAA. There will be no formal RFP or other
solicitation regarding this requirement. An invitation to submit a
proposal does not assure subsequent award. No award will be made under
this BAA without a full technical and cost proposals and past
performance evaluation. The Technical proposal will include the
requirement for an offeror-developed statement of Work (SOW) and a
Schedule of Deliverables. The cost proposals realism and the offeror's
capacity to perform the work proposed. The past performance proposals
will be addressed in the request and will include a request for
contractor performance information from relevant organizations. To be
cosidered abstracts of proposals shall be received by 2:00 p.m. EST,
July 5, 1996 at the Application Control Center address stated above.
All abstracts should include the identifier PR/AWARD#: RC961370 on the
envelope and on the first page. The abstract should provide on
overview of the project and associated costs. It shall be prepared on
8.5 X 11 inch plain paper and shall be printed on one side of each page
only. It should have on inch margins on all sides. Abstracts shall not
exceed 15 pages (reviewers will not read beyond the 15th page). Any
cover letter, statements of projected costs, and all other attachments
are subjsect to the page limit. Offerors shall submit an original and
9 copies of the abstract which shall include a staff loading and
availability chart. V. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION: Abstracts shall clearly
state the purpose and objectives of the study, specify and provide the
rationale for the research design and procedures, briefly describe
anticipated products and their schedule, and providew evidence of
offeror's capacity to carry out the work-- including a summary table or
chart specifying each proposed staff member's ( by name) commitment to
each task and subtask by project year. The abstract should indicate
how the proposed research will address the following questions: (1) How
can a commitment to an agreed upon and widely accepted vision of high
achievement for all students and high performance for educators be
created and sustained among the members of the learning
community--educators, parents, students, and the surrounding community?
(2) How can all core education activities be oriented to a vision of
high achievement for all students? (3) How can a learning community
identify and implement appropriate instructional strategies to assure
that all students achieve to high levels? (4) How can the school
organization and community resources be expeditously used, modified or
built anew to support high performance learning communities? (5) How
can the policy enviroment and governance arrangements be expeditiously
used, modified or built anew to support high performance learning
communities? (6) How can key members of the learning community work
together to identify and define the roles each will play in a
restructured school, identify needed knowledge and skills to
effectively and efficiently carry out their roles, and design and
implement a plan to gain, maintain and best use that knowledge and
those skills? (7) How can a high performance learning community be
sustained in the face of change; e.g., personnel, leadership,
resources, rewards and incentives, accountability practices,
demography, etc.? (8) How can a commitment to self-assesment and
continous improvement be created and sustained? (9) How can learning
communities document and assess their progress in reaching a vision of
high achievement for all students? In addition to addressing these
questions, the offerors should specify the anticipated publishable
products of each year's effort and plans to disseminate them in hard
copy and/or electronic media to education policymakers, practitioners,
and other appropriate audiences. It will be a requirement for each
product or deliverable to be submitted to the Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative (COTR) in draft for expert review and revised
on the basis of this review before submission in final form. (0157) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0002 19960606\A-0002.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|