|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 20,1996 PSA#1620U.S. Department of Education, Grants and Contracts Services, 7th & D
Streets, SW, Room 3633, ROB Washington, D.C. 20202-4337 A -- PART 1 OF 2 DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING HIGH PERFORMANCE LEARNING
COMMUNITIES SOL RC-96-1370 DUE 070596 POC Linda Feeney, 202-708-8282.
PART 1 OF 2: Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)-- Developing and
Implementing High Performance Learning Communities. U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, GSA Bldg., Room 3633, 7th and
D Streets, SW., Washington, D.C. 20202-4337. Contract Officer: Helen
Chang, 202-708-9740. I. INTRODUCTION: The United States Department of
Education (ED) requests proposals for studies on Developing and
Implementing High Performance Learning Communities. The studies shall
focus on the strategies and procedures to initiate, support, and
sustain high achievement for all students, especially those students in
high poverty schools. II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: ED will contemplate
awarding up to three fixed-priced contracts. ED expects to award
$1,000,000 to $1,250,000 for each study in the first year; and from
$1,000,000 to $1,250,000 for each study for four additional years.
Option years are at ED's discretion and subject to the availability of
funds. There have been a number of studies on restructuring schools to
support high levels of achievement for all students. Generally, these
studies enumerate common characteristics of successful restructuring
such as: an agreed upon vision of high achievement for all students by
teachers, parents, pupils and the community; core education activities
( curriculum and instruction, assessments, professional development,
after-school tutoring, etc.) oriented toward this vision; a school
organization that helps teachers and students perform at high levels
(i.e., to think, to develop in-depth understanding, and to solve
problems); and, external support that enhances organizational capacity
and helps the school focus on student learning. These characteristics
generally define high performance learning communities-- communities
that successfully organize or develop the values, beliefs, and
technical skills of its members to help students achieve at high
levels. III. PURPOSE Although helpful, these general characteristics
fail to provide specific strategies and procedures to initiate, support
and maintain high performance learning communities (i.e. the school,
the surrounding community, and the school governance and policy
environment) to promote high levels of learning for all students/
Accordingly, this BAA is a call for studies to: develop prototypical
strategies and procedures, solidly grounded in theory and empirical
evidence, to build high performance learning communities; established
partnerships with schools and pilot the resultants prototypes in high
poverty school communities and revise the prototypes on the basis of
what is learned; and, replicate the revised prototypes in a number of
communities and report the outcomes. A publishable product (s) must
result from each year's effort. IV. SUBMISSON REQUIREMENTS: ED will use
the following submission process to evaluate proposals submitted in
response to this announcement. The offerors shall submit an abstract of
a proposal. ED will evaluate all abstracts against the technical
evaluation criteria described in this announcement. ED may use more
than one panel if needed. ED will invite full technical, past
performance, and cost proposals from offeror with the most promising
abstracts. In the invitation, ED will specify proposal format and the
representations and certifications required under the Federal
Acquisition Regulations, the Education Department Acquisition
Regulations and other ED clauses to be included in the contract(s) that
will result from the BAA. There will be no formal RFP or other
solicitation regarding this requirement. An invitation to submit a
proposal does not assure subsequent award. No award will be made under
this BAA without a full technical and cost proposals and past
performance evaluation. The Technical proposal will include the
requirement for an offeror-developed statement of Work (SOW) and a
Schedule of Deliverables. The cost proposal must provide sufficient
details to allow assessment of cost realism and the offeror's capacity
to perform the work proposed. The past performance proposals will be
addressed in the request and will include a request for contractor
performance information from relevant organizations. To be considered
abstracts of proposals shall be received by 2:00 p.m. EST, July 5, 1996
at the Application Control Center address stated above. All abstracts
should include the identifier PR/AWARD#: RC961370 on the envelope and
on the first page. The abstract should provide on overview of the
project and associated costs. It shall be prepared on 8.5 X 11 inch
plain paper and shall be printed on one side of each page only. It
should have on inch margins on all sides. Abstracts shall not exceed 15
pages (reviewers will not read beyond the 15th page). Any cover letter,
statements of projected costs, and all other attachments are subject to
the page limit. Offerors shall submit an original and 9 copies of the
abstract which shall include a staff loading and availability chart. V.
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION: Abstracts shall clearly state the purpose and
objectives of the study, specify and provide the rationale for the
research design and procedures, briefly describe anticipated products
and their schedule, and provide evidence of offeror's capacity to carry
out the work-- including a summary table or chart specifying each
proposed staff member's ( by name) commitment to each task and subtask
by project year. The abstract should indicate how the proposed
research will address the following questions: (1) How can a commitment
to an agreed upon and widely accepted vision of high achievement for
all students and high performance for educators be created and
sustained among the members of the learning community--educators,
parents, students, and the surrounding community? (2) How can all core
education activities be oriented to a vision of high achievement for
all students? (3) How can a learning community identify and implement
appropriate instructional strategies to assure that all students
achieve to high levels? (4) How can the school organization and
community resources be expeditously used, modified or built anew to
support high performance learning communities? (5) How can the policy
environment and governance arrangements be expeditiously used, modified
or built anew to support high performance learning communities? (6) How
can key members of the learning community work together to identify and
define the roles each will play in a restructured school, identify
needed knowledge and skills to effectively and efficiently carry out
their roles, and design and implement a plan to gain, maintain and best
use that knowledge and those skills? (7) How can a high performance
learning community be sustained in the face of change; e.g., personnel,
leadership, resources, rewards and incentives, accountability
practices, demography, etc.? (8) How can a commitment to self-assesment
and continous improvement be created and sustained? (9) How can
learning communities document and assess their progress in reaching a
vision of high achievement for all students? In addition to addressing
these questions, the offerors should specify the anticipated
publishable products of each year's effort and plans to disseminate
them in hard copy and/or electronic media to education policymakers,
practitioners, and other appropriate audiences. It will be a
requirement for each product or deliverable to be submitted to the
Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) in draft for
expert review and revised on the basis of this review before submission
in final form. (0170) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0002 19960619\A-0002.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|