|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 16,1996 PSA#1637Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc., P.O. Box 2002, Oak Ridge, TN
37831-6501 A -- MERCURY TREATMENT Due 073196. Contact Ken Simpson, 423/435-3763/
Dave Evans, 4123/435-3186. CBD Announcement for Need of Mercury
Treatment. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. (LMES), under its Prime
Contract Numbers DE-AC05-960R22464 and DE-AC05-840R21400 has identified
over 30,000 m3 of mercury contaminated mixed low level and transuranic
wastes in the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. These waste streams
include not only elemental mercury, but also large quantities of
sludges, soils, and debris waste with mercury concentrations ranging
from less than 2 ppm to greater than 50,000 ppm. According to Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations, wastes containing
less than 260 ppm that exceed a mercury concentration of 0.20 mg/l, as
determined by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SW-846 Method 1311
Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), must be treated by a
suitable method to meet this standard. Wastes with mercury
concentrations greater than 260 ppm must be retorted, or treated by a
process that the EPA deems equivalent to retorting, to reduce the
mercury concentration to less than 260 ppm. In addition, the waste must
meet the TCLP requirements, after processing. Secondary mercury waste
streams generated from retorting and other separation processes and
elemental mercury contaminated with radionuclides must be amalgamated
to meet RCRA technology-based treatment standards, such that the RCRA
Land Disposal Restrictions are satisfied. This will allow disposal of
these waste streams in a RCRA Subtitle C facility. Typically, however,
DOE would additionally prefer that the treated waste be capable of
passing TCLP requirements and that the final waste form exhibit a
substantially reduced vapor pressure. This is the intent of the
amalgamation technology-based treatment standard. LMES intends to
conduct a source selection for vendors to participate in demonstrations
of different types of technologies capable of: Stabilizing wastes
containing less than 260 ppm of mercury to meet the TCLP limit: Many of
the mercury bearing DOE wastes are in the form of debris, non-aqueous
sludges, adsorbed liquids, or partially or fully stabilized sludges.
Mercury contaminated soils are also of significant concern. Mercury
contained in these wastes is not readily accessible to leaching agents
or thermal desorption, and successful removal of mercury from these
wastes has not been demonstrated. The mercury may be chemically bound
to a matrix constituent such as vermiculant, portland cement, or clay,
or physically trapped in the matrix, but still leachable in excess of
the prescribed TCLP limits. Thus, it may be more practical to
stabilize some mixed wastes to comply with regulations rather than
extracting the mercury. Improved mercury stabilization processes would
chemically or physically bind mercury to meet TCLP limits for the
complex sludges, stabilized wastes, soils and debris in the DOE
inventory. Processing methods must ensure adequate stabilization, and
include measuring and monitoring methods to control and verify the
process. Proposed technologies should include systems to minimize
worker exposure, secondary waste generation, and capital and operating
cost, while maximizing operational flexibility and radionuclide
containment. All secondary waste streams generated during the
demonstration must also be treated to meet disposal standards.
Separation of mercury from wastes containing more than 260 ppm to meet
the TCLP limit and treatment of the secondary mercury waste stream:
Improved mercury removal/separation processes would chemically,
physically, or thermally extract mercury for separate stabilization
from the complex sludges, stabilized wastes, soils and debris in the
DOE mixed waste inventory. Processing methods must ensure adequate
mercury removal, and include measuring and monitoring methods to
control and verify the process. Proposed technologies should include
systems to minimize worker exposure, secondary waste generation, and
capital and operating cost, while maximizing operational flexibility
and radionuclide containment. All secondary waste streams generated
during the demonstration must also be treated to meet disposal
standards. Amalgamation of elemental mercury contaminated with
radionuclides to meet the TCLP limit and to reduce the vapor pressure
of the mercury. Mercury amalgamation processes would chemically and/or
physically bind the mercury and reduce the vapor pressure of the
elemental mercury. Processing must meet LDR standards and include
measuring and monitoring methods to control and verify the process.
Proposed technologies should include systems to minimize worker
exposure, secondary waste generation, and capital and operating cost,
while maximizing operational flexibility and radionuclide containment.
All secondary waste streams generated during the demonstration must
also be treated to meet disposal standards. The demonstrations will be
conducted on actual mixed low level wastes and may be pilot and/or
full scale as appropriate. The DOE prefers that these demonstrations be
preformed at the Vendor's facility. However, under the appropriate
conditions demonstration could be preformed by a vendor at a DOE
facility on a competitive basis. Qualified interested firms must
possess all the applicable permits and licenses prior to subcontract
award as appropriate. The proposed methodology is to award one or more
subcontracts per category, depending on the costs of the
demonstrations and the available funding. Subcontracts will be awarded
to vendors whose proposals provide the greatest value to the
Government as determined by the evaluation criteria which will be set
forth in the Request for Proposals (RFP). Vendors may submit multiple
proposals for any or all of the categories. The RFP is expected to be
issued in early FY - 97 with awards after evaluation of responses is
completed. All vendors interested in receiving any or all of the RFPs
should submit their request(s) by letter or by Fax. The request should
identify which RFP(s) they wish to receive and a short description of
the process they are expecting to propose. Telephone requests will not
be accepted. (192) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0004 19960715\A-0004.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|