|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF OCTOBER 30,1996 PSA#1711OICC ROICC Cherry Point, NAVFACENGCOM Contracts, PSC Box 8006, Cherry
Point, NC 28533-0006 C -- INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND
DESIGN SERVICES Sol N62470-97-D-6826. Due 121096. Contact Marsha
Temple, Telephone (919) 466-4751, Contracting Officer, M. J. Patterson,
CDR, CEC, USN. This solicitation is for structural engineering design
services for various projects at MCAS, Cherry Point, NC. This is NOT a
request for proposals. This proposed contract is being solicited on an
unrestricted basis. It shall have an initial term of one year and may
be renewed for one additional year at the option of the Government. The
maximum total fee (subject to necessary changes) shall not exceed
$500,000, including the option year. Engineering Services are required
for field investigations, structural analyses, preparation of plans,
specifications, cost estimates, related studies, and all associated
engineering services, shop drawing review, and Quality Assurance Plan
preparation (provides construction contract inspection requirements).
Incidental architectural, mechanical and electrical considerations may
be required on some projects. Experience is required in design of
concrete, steel, wood, composites and other common structural
materials. A working knowledge of destructive and non-destructive
material sampling and testing techniques is required. Sampling and
testing of materials for lead paint and asbestos may occasionally be
required. Several relatively small projects with quick turnaround times
are anticipated. Firms are required to prepare cost estimates utilizing
the computerized CES format, specifications in the SpecsIntact system
format, and drawings shall be in AutoCAD compatible format. Firms that
meet the requirements described in this announcement are required to
submit one copy each of completed SF-254 and SF-255 forms. Copies of
SF-254 forms are also required for proposed subconsultants and copies
of SF-255 forms are encouraged for proposed subconsultants who are
expected to contribute significantly to the contract. Inquiries shall
refer to contract number and title. The A&E must demonstrate his and
each key subconsultant's qualifications with respect to the published
evaluation factors for design and all option services. Evaluation
factors (1) and (2) are of equal and greatest importance; factors (6),
(7), and (8) are of lesser importance than factors (1) through (5).
Pertinent statements relative to the evaluation factors shall be
included in Part 10 of form SF-255. Superfluous information is
discouraged. Firms responding by 4:00 p.m. EST, 10 December 1996 will
be considered. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR
52.215-10. Specific evaluation factors include: (1) Professional
qualifications of the firm's proposed personnel and its subconsultants
(if proposed), necessary for satisfactory performance of required
services. Resumes shall be included only for key persons expected to
perform work under this contract (number of resumes shall not exceed
eight), shall identify anticipated role in performing contract work,
shall show specific location of each person's assigned office, shall
list specific training and certification, and shall highlight specific
work experience applicable to this contract, (2) Specialized recent
(within the last five years) experience of the firm (including
subconsultants) and technical competence in the type of work required.
Cite examples of prior work relationships with proposed
subconsultants/associates. In Part 8 of SF-255 provide a synopsis of
the scope of work, year work completed, point of contact and telephone
number for each project listed. Include only projects involving
structural designs or evaluations. Specific projects listed shall
include a cross reference to the names of persons identified in
evaluation factor 1 and briefly describe their role in the project.
Provide evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the
profession of engineering in the State of residence, i.e., state
registration number. (3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the
required time. Describe knowledge of the work area at Cherry Point and
outlying fields. In a maximum of one page, provide a narrative and/or
chart or graph showing the anticipated backlog of work over the next
twelve month period for key personnel proposed for use in this
contract. Firms shall identify any major pending projects or
organizational changes that could impact the ability to dedicate
personnel and resources to this contract. Provide one page maximum for
you and subconsultants that describes office automation support and
system and other supporting equipment (i.e. AutoCAD, SpecsIntact). (4)
Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private
industry in terms of demonstrated compliance with performance schedules
and evidence of demonstrated long term business relationships and
repeat business with Government and private customers. Firms may submit
letters of commendation received for the specific projects identified
in Part 8 of SF-255. (5) Quality and cost control. Provide a one page
maximum summary of how your firm approaches internal quality control
and cost control processes and procedures. Identify how these will be
maintained for all work by multiple offices and subconsultants. Provide
an example of your quality control program in action. (6) Demonstrated
success in prescribing the use of recovered materials and achieving
waste reduction and energy efficiency in facility design. Relate to
personnel proposed and example projects listed, if possible. (7)
Geographical office locations of the firm (including subconsultants)
that will be involved in the contract. State anticipated mode of
transportation to be used from each office and estimate approximate
mileage and typical time. Applicable of this criterion is contingent
upon receiving an appropriate number of qualified firms. (8) The volume
of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense
(DOD) shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an
equitable distribution of DOD architect-engineer contracts among
qualified architect-engineer firms. (302) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0020 19961029\C-0006.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|