|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF DECEMBER 26,1996 PSA#1749SOUTHWESTNAVFACENGCOM (Code 531), 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA
92132-5187 Y -- T58-16 AIRCRAFT ENGINE TEST CELL RETROFIT, MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION, CAMP PENDLETON, CA SOL N68711-95-R-7579 DUE 022497 POC For
plans and specs information call (619) 532-2796/Contract Specialist,
Mike Larson/Contracting Officer, Katherine G. Luhmann. Sources sought
to design, engineer and construct modifications to an existing T-76
Aircraft Test Cell to enable the test cell to be used to test T58-16
turboshaft aircraft engines at the Marine Corps Air Station, Camp
Pendleton, California. The project includes design and construction of
air dynamometer and engine augmenters, diked fuel skid area, various
repairs and modifications, and finish rehabilitation to the existing
test cell. The contract is to be awarded to the responsible offeror who
submits the proposal considered most advantageous to the Government
considering "Price" and "Technical" evaluation factors. The following
evaluation criteria have been established: Factor (1) Past performance
of the design/build team to include the following subfactors: (1.1)
The number of projects, with scope, magnitude, complexity and cost
similar to the requirements in this RFP, completed in the last ten
years. Evaluation will include the number of projects completed by the
firms comprising the team, individually, and the design/build team as
a whole, and the change order rate, demonstrating the proposer's
capability to successfully complete on time a project of similar scope
and complexity of this requirement. (1.2) Experience of the prime
contractor in the scheduling of the work and the management of the
design and construction of the proposed project to meet a specified
time frame. Evaluation will be based on the ability and experience of
the prime contractor to manage design and construction and schedule
work at the construction site. (1.3) Offeror's reputation for
satisfying its customers by delivering quality work in a timely manner
at a reasonable price. Includes an offeror's reputation for integrity,
reasonable and cooperative conduct, effectiveness of management, and
commitment to customer satisfaction. Information obtained from the
offeror and from other sources, including past and present customers,
federal, state, and local government agencies, will be considered.
Factor (2) Relevant design and construction experience to include the
following subfactors: (2.1) Professional qualifications and experience
of the proposer and their key design staff in the design and
construction of engine test cells to include the design and
construction of test cells and hush houses and/or projects of similar
scope and complexity in both the public and private sectors. (2.2)
Professional qualifications and experience of the proposer and their
key design staff in the design and construction of structural steel
components to include successful design and construction of structural
steel members in projects of similar complexity. (2.3) Professional
qualifications and experience of the proposer and their key design
staff with sound reduction to include successful design and
construction of sound reduction components (doors, windows, panels and
enclosures). (2.4) Professional qualifications and experience of the
proposer and their key design staff in the design and construction of
fire protection systems. (2.5) Professional qualifications and
experience of the proposer and their key design staff with foundations
to include successful design and construction of foundations in
projects of similar complexity. (2.6) Professional qualifications and
experience of the proposer and their key design staff with small cranes
(trolley and chain hoist) to include successful design and construction
of small crane systems. Factor (3) Project management, quality control
and safety to include the following subfactors: (3.1) Adequate
experience and qualifications of key managment and personnel to perform
their assigned responsibilities effectively. Experience in coordinating
interdisciplinary engineering and construction skills/personnel by
demonstrating the capability to successfully complete on time a project
of similar scope and complexity of this requirement. (3.2) Management
control system to include how the project design and construction
process will be managed, the ability to effectively coordinate
architectural and engineering professionals, trade subcontractors and
construction team effort, and the ability to manage the design process
including the level of details required for proper documentation of
drawings and specifications. Evaluation will include management
techniques, organization an software to be used to track and control
activities, including schedule and cost, that clearly demonstrate
workability and conformance with the specifications. (3.3) Quality
control system to include the controls necessary to ensure quality
throughout the design to construction process to completion, and the
credentials and commendations of the Quality Control Inspector to be
used on this project. (3.4) Safety control procedures to include the
steps proposed to promote and ensure safety during the construction of
the turboshaft test cell, the offerors operations safety and incident
rate for the last five years, the offerors last three Interstate
Modifier Rate (IMR) for the offerors insurance, and attention and
familiarity with OSHA standards and environmentalregulations. Factor
(4) Subcontracting effort with the following subfactors: (4.1) Extent
to which small and small disadvantaged firms are specifically
identified in the proposal. Evaluation will include the complexity and
variety of the work small and small disadvantaged firms are to
perform, extent of commitment to use small and small disadvantaged
firms, realism of the proposal for use of small and small disadvantaged
firms, and the extent of participation of small and small disadvantaged
firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition. (4.2) Prior
performance of offerors in complying with requirements of the clauses
at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and Small
Disadvantaged Business Concerns, and 52.219-9, Small Business and Small
Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan. A pre-proposal conference
shall be held on February 11, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. in the "Blue Room" at
the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest Division, 1220
Pacific Highway, San Diego, California 92132. Participants must reserve
seating a minimum of two days in advance of the conference date by
contacting Kathy Luhmann at (619) 532-2796. This is not a public bid
opening. The estimated cost is between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000. Firm
Fixed Price design and construction contract proposals will be
considered from all responsible sources. This project is unrestricted.
The standard industrial code is 1522 and the annual size standard is
$17 million. It is recommended that the subcontracting plan goals
reflect a minimum goal of 5% for Small Disadvantaged Business
subcontracting efforts. Potential offerors should request in writing
stating RFP number N68711-95-R-7579, with complete name, address, area
code, and phone number and whether proposing as a
prime/subcontract/supplier. There will be a charge for plans and
specifications. This amount will be determined before RFP's are
availble. Checks are to be made out to DEFENSE PRINTING SERVICE.
PRINTING FEES ARE NOT REFUNDABLE. Mail requests to Southwest Division,
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1220 Pacific Highway, Building
132, San Diego, CA 92132-5187. Please fax requests to (619) 532-2083;
however, requests will not be proecessing until your check has been
received by this office. Submit one (1) check per project. Solicitation
packages are limited to two (2) per prime contractor and (1) per
subcontractor/supplier. (0358) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0123 19961226\Y-0012.SOL)
Y - Construction of Structures and Facilities Index Page
|
|