|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JANUARY 14,1997 PSA#1761R&D Contracting Directorate, Bldg 7, 2530 C Street, WPAFB, OH
45433-7607 A -- REDUCTION OF MAN-MADE INFRARED CLUTTER (ROMIC) EFFORT (WRIGHT
LABORATORY) SOL PRDA 97-05-AAK DUE 022697 POC Contact Point, Donald W
Robinson, 937-255-2976, Contract Negotiator INTRODUCTION: Wright
Laboratory (WL) is interested in receiving proposals (technical and
cost) on the research effort described in Section B. Proposals in
response to this PRDA #97-05-AAK shall be submitted by 26 FEB 97, 1500
hours Eastern Standard Time, addressed to (Attn: Mr. Donald W.
Robinson ), WL/AAKE, Building 7, 2530 C Street, Wright-Patterson AFB,
OH 45433-7607. Proposals shall not be submitted via facsimile
transmission. This is an unrestricted solicitation. Small businesses
are encouraged to propose on all or any part of this solicitation.
Proposals submitted shall be in accordance with this announcement.
Proposal receipt after the cutoff date and time specified herein shall
be treated in accordance with restrictions of FAR 52.215-10; copy of
this provision may be obtained from the contracting point of contact
cited in Section F. There will be no other solicitation issued in
regard to this requirement. Offerors should be alert for any amendments
to this solicitation that may be published. This PRDA #97-05-AAK may be
amended to allow subsequent submission of proposal dates. Offerors
should obtain a copy of the WL Guide entitled, "PRDA and BAA Guide for
Industry". This guide was specifically designed to assist offerors in
understanding the PRDA/BAA proposal process. Copies may be requested
from the contracting point of contact or obtained via the world wide
web site: www.wl.wpafb.af.mil/contract. B -- REQUIREMENTS; (1)
Technical Description: Present and future military aircraft will
require an infrared threat warning capability to detect and identify
missile threats. These aircraft routinely fly missions over both rural
and urban background clutter. Presently, infrared warning systems can
use spectral, spatial, and temporal means of identifying a missile
from the background, thus reducing the false alarm rate to an
acceptable value. However, the urban environment has become more
demanding because of two factors. The first factor is the requirement
for even less false alarms over a populated area and the second factor
is the requirement to reject the additional manmade sources that can
be seen in a populated industrial area. The general requirement for
this effort is to reduce the false alarm rate of infrared detection
systems against these manmade sources. An additional requirement is
that the proposed technique work for both scanning and starring
infrared warning systems. Therefore, the solution must be applicable to
systems with a frame rate of 1/2 frame per second to 100 (or more)
frames per second. If hardware related, the solution should not
increase the size and weight of present infrared system designs by more
than 25 percent. The solution should be constrained to infrared sensor
design and/or infrared processing. Real missile signatures and real
manmade false alarm sources should be used for analyzing and evaluating
the possible solutions to this problem. The effort may require ground
measurements of urban false alarm sources, if needed to develop and
evaluate the proposed solution. Fabrication or the purchasing of a
measurement device may be necessary if required to meet program
objectives. Collecting flight data or measuring missile signatures is
not considered to be required by this program. The performance of the
proposed technique should be demonstrable with real data by simulation
in non-real time. (2) Deliverable Items: (a) The following deliverable
data items shall be proposed: (i) Status Report, DI-MGMT-80368A/T,
monthly; (ii) Funds and Man-hour Expenditure Report, DI-FNCL-80331/T,
monthly; (iii) Project Planning Chart, DI-MGMT-80507A/T, monthly; (iv)
Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR), DI-MGMT-81468, quarterly; (v)
Presentation Material, DI-ADMN-81373/T, as required; (vi) Scientific
and Technical Reports, Contractor's Billing Voucher, DI-MISC-80711/T,
monthly; and (vii) Scientific and Technical Reports, DI-MISC-80711/T,
(Draft and Reproducible Final). (b) The following additional
deliverable items shall be proposed: None (3) Security Requirements:
TEMPEST requirements will apply. Generation of classified material for
this solicitation effort is authorized only on equipment approved for
classified processing by Air Force TEMPEST authorities. (4) Other
Special Requirements: International Trade in Arms Restrictions apply.
Public Law 98-94 applies to this acquisition. Offerors must submit an
approved DD Form 2345, Military Critical Technical Data Agreement with
their proposal. C -- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: (1) Anticipated Period of
Performance: The total length of the technical effort is estimated to
be 31 months. The contractor shall also provide for an additional 4
months for processing/completion of the final report. (2) Expected
Award Date: AUGUST 97. (3) Air Force Estimate: The Air Force funding
profile is estimated at 770k with 10k in FY-97, 100k in FY-98, 360k in
FY-99, and 300k in FY-00. This funding profile is an estimate only and
is not a promise for funding as all funding is subject to change due to
Air Force discretion and availability. (4) Type of Instrument: Contract
-- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) or Cost (no fee). Any grant(s) or
cooperative agreement(s) awarded will be cost (no fee) or cost sharing
and will be subject to the mutual agreement of the parties. (5)
Government Furnished Property: Available missile signature data will be
provided. (6) Size Status: For the purpose of this acquisition, the
size standard is 500 employees (SIC 8731). (7) Notice to Foreign-Owned
Firms: It is anticipated that Foreign-Owned Firms will be ineligible
to compete as a prime contractor for this effort. Foreign contractors
should also be aware that restrictions may apply which could preclude
their participation as a sub-contractor in this acquisition. Such firms
are asked to immediately notify the contracting point of contact upon
deciding to respond to this announcement. D -- PROPOSAL PREPARATION
INSTRUCTIONS: (1) General Instructions: Offerors should apply the
restrictive notice prescribed in the provision at FAR 52.215-12,
Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, to trade secrets or
privileged commercial and financial information contained in their
proposals. Proposal questions should be directed to one of the points
of contact listed below. Offerors should refer to the instructions
contained in the WL "PRDA and BAA Guide for Industry" referenced in
Section A of this announcement. Separate technical and cost proposal
volumes are required and must be valid for at least 180 days. Proposals
must reference the above PRDA #97-05-AAK number. Proposals shall be
submitted in an original and three (3) copies. All responsible sources
may submit a proposal which shall be evaluated against the criteria
set forth below in the Section E -- Basis of Award. Offerors are
advised that only contracting officers are legally authorized to
contractually bind or otherwise commit the Air Force. (2) Technical
Proposal: The technical proposal shall include a discussion of the
nature and scope of the research and the technical approach. Additional
information on prior work in this area, descriptions of available
equipment, data and facilities, and resumes of personnel who will be
participating in this effort should also be included as attachments to
the technical proposal and are not included in the page limit
discussed below. The technical proposal shall include a Statement of
Work (SOW) detailing the technical tasks / phases proposed to be
accomplished under the proposed effort and be suitable for instrument
incorporation. Offerors should refer to the WL Guide to assist in SOW
preparation. Any questions concerning the technical proposal or SOW
preparation should be referred to the technical point of contact. (3)
Cost Proposal: Adequate price competition is anticipated. The cost
proposal / price breakdown shall be furnished with supporting
schedules, and shall include a cost and person-hour breakdown by task
. (4) Page Limitations: The technical proposal shall be limited to 35
pages (12 pitch or larger type), double-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 by 11
inches. The page limitation includes all information, i.e., indexes,
photographs, fold-outs, appendices, attachments, etc. (other than the
specific exceptions stated above). Pages in excess of this limitation
will be removed from the proposal and will not be evaluated by the Air
Force. Cost proposals have no page limitation, however, offerors are
requested to limit cost proposals to 25 pages as a goal. (5)
Preparation Cost: This announcement does not commit the Air Force to
pay for any proposal preparation cost. The cost of preparing proposals
in response to this PRDA #97-05-AAK is not an allowable direct charge
to any resulting award, or any other procurement instrument. However,
it may be an allowable expense to the normal bid and proposal indirect
cost as specified in FAR 31.205-18. E -- BASIS FOR AWARD: The selection
of one or more sources for award will be based on an evaluation of an
offeror's proposal (both technical and cost) to determine the overall
merit of the proposal in response to the announcement. The technical
aspect, which is ranked as the first order of priority, shall be
evaluated based on the following criteria which are of equal
importance: (a) new and creative solutions, (b) discussion of the
offeror's technical approach indicating his understanding of the
problem and validating the soundness of the proposed solution(s),
including cost and supportability of the technology when used in an
operating system, (c) quality and availability of technical resources
including personnel, facilities, and applicable optical and electronic
signal processing experience. Cost and / or price, which includes
consideration of proposed budgets and funding profiles, is a
substantial factor, but, ranked as the second order of priority. No
other evaluation criteria will be used. The technical and cost
proposals will be evaluated at the same time. The Air Force reserves
the right to select for award any, all, part, or none of the
proposal(s) received. F -- POINTS OF CONTACT: (1) An Ombudsman has been
appointed to hear concerns from offerors and potential offerors during
the proposal development phase of this acquisition. The purpose of the
Ombudsman is not to diminish the authority of the contracting officer,
but to communicate contractor concerns, issues, disagreements and
recommendations to the appropriate Air Force personnel. All potential
offerors should use established channels to voice concerns before
resorting to use the Ombudsman. When requested, the Ombudsman will
maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The
Ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals or in the
source selection. The Ombudsman should only be contacted with issues or
problems that have been previously brought to the attention of the
contracting officer and could not be satisfactorily resolved at the
level. These serious concerns only may be directed to the Ombudsman,
Mr. Daniel L. Kugel, ASC/SY, Bldg. 52, 2475 K St., Suite 1,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7642, E-Mail: kugeldl@sy.wpafb.af.mil,
phone (937) 255-3855. (2) Technical Point of Contact: Mr. Joseph E.
Novak, WL/AAJP, Bldg 620, 2241 Avionics Circle Ste 2, Wright-Patterson
Air Force Base OH 45433-7304, (937) 255-9272 Ex-1754. (3)
Contracting/Cost Point of Contact: Mr. Donald W. Robinson, WL/AAKE,
Bldg 7, 2530 C Street, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7607,
(937) 255- (0010) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0002 19970114\A-0002.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|