|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MAY 9,1997 PSA#1842CECOM Acquisiton Center, Washington Operations Office,
AMSEL-AC-WB-B,Hoffman 1, 2461 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22331-0700 A -- BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT -- FORWARD LOOKING MINE DETECTION
SENSORS PROGRAM SOL DAAB07-97-R-BAA-4 DUE 070897 POC Ricky Stanfield,
Project Engineer,703-704-2452, and Peggy A. Melanson, Contracting
Officer, 703-325-6096 The US Army Communications-Electronics Command
(CECOM), Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate (NVESD),
Countermine Division is soliciting proposals for the development of
technologies to detect antitank (AT) and large antipersonnel (AP) mines
at standoff distances under the Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)
DAAB07-97-R-BAA-4 for the Forward Looking Sensors program. No FY97
contract awards are anticipated; offerors should base proposal on
1QFY98 award. The Army currently has no system to adequately detect
mines at standoff distances greater than five meters from land-based
platforms. The objective of this BAA is to develop standoff mine
detection technologies that will address individual AT mines and large
AP mines that are surface laid or buried up to 20 cm at a standoff
distance of up to sixty meters. Burial depth is measured from the
surface of the ground to the top of the mine. The landmines will range
in size from 12 to 38 cm in diameter or width and must be detected and
reported within seconds. The location of the mine needs to be
determined within 0.25 meters from the edge of the target. The Army's
ultimate goal for the Forward Looking Sensors program is to integrate
this mine detection subsystem with a mine neutralization system on a
vehicle platform to detect and neutralize on the move. Both detection
and neutralization should occur at standoff distances up to 60 meters.
The standoff distance and detection time budget are a function of the
speed of the vehicle and braking distance to stop for a mine; tactical
speeds are approximately 16 kph. The Forward Looking Sensors program is
currently scheduled for a Technology Demonstration (TD) in FY00.
Minimum detection probabilities of 94% are required for the TD.
TECHNICAL PROBLEMS OF INTEREST: Proposals addressing sensing
technologies, processing, data fusion, a combination of the above,
modeling, etc. are acceptable. Detection may be accomplished by using
radar, infrared cameras, acoustic methods, passive millimeter wave
technologies, or those sensors which can meet the goals of the program.
Approaches that seek to explore sensing technologies at a standoff
distance of up to sixty meters with a path width of 5 meters required,
8 meters desired, are of particular interest. This BAA is issued under
the provision of Paragraph 6.102 (d) (2) of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) which provides for the competitive selection of basic
research proposals. Proposals submitted in response to this BAA that
are selected for award are considered to be the result of full and open
competition and are in full compliance with the provisions of Public
Law 98-369, "The Competition in Contracting Act" of 1984. This
announcement is an expression of interest only and does not commit the
Government to pay for proposal preparation cost. The cost of preparing
proposals in response to this BAA is not considered an allowable direct
charge to any resulting contract or to any other contract. However, it
may be an allowable expense to the normal bid and proposal indirect
cost as specified in FAR 31.205-18. Proposals will be considered from
organizations interested in conducting scientific research, such as
colleges and universities, commercial firms, nonprofit research
institutes, small business and small disadvantaged business concerns,
historically black colleges and universities and minority business
enterprises and institutions. . Contingent upon meeting established
security requirements, industries of all foreign countries are eligible
to participate in this BAA. At present classified contracts are not
anticipated. If a subcontract(s) with a Federally Funded Research and
Development Center (FFRDC) is proposed, offerors are reminded of the
limitations in their use (see FAR 35.017) and must provide
documentation in the proposal that work is not otherwise available from
the private sector. To be eligible for award of a contract, a
prospective contractor must meet certain minimum standards pertaining
to financial resources, ability to comply with the performance
schedule, prior records of performance, integrity, organization,
experience, operational controls, technical skills, facilities and
equipment. For additional informational and guidance concerning
qualifications and standards for responsibility of perspective
contractors, please refer to FAR Part 9. There will be no formal
request for proposal or any solicitation document issued in regard to
this BAA; therefore, interested parties should be alert for any BAA
Amendments that may be published in the Commerce Business Daily. The
Government reserves the right to select for award all, some, or none of
the proposals received in response to this announcement. While one or
more 12 month R&D efforts with phased decision points may be awarded in
FY98, the Government reserves the right to award contracts as a result
of this announcement for two years from the receipt of proposals.
Specific costs and terms and conditions will be negotiated prior to
award. The Government strongly encourages the informal discussion of
any proposed effort prior to the submission of a formal proposal.
Questions concerning contractual, cost, or pricing format may be
directed to the Contracting Officer, Ms. Peggy Melanson 703-325-6096.
Questions on technical matters may be referred to Mr. Ricky Stanfield
703-704-2452. All interested parties are encouraged to contact the
cited individuals at any time prior to proposal submission in order to
obtain clarifications and guidance. Offerors are cautioned that all
such inquiries must be made prior to Government receipt of proposals.
Once a proposal is received by NV/Countermine Division, CECOM all
communications should be through the Contracting Officer. Prospective
offerors are cautioned that only the Contracting Officer is legally
authorized to commit the Government. Proposals are due by 8 July 1997
at 1400 hours Eastern Standard Time. Submit proposals to: COMMANDER, US
ARMY CECOM, ATTN: AMSEL RD NV T-CD-MN (STANFIELD), 10221 BURBECK RD STE
430, FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-5806. The selection(s) proposals for
contract award will be based on a scientific and engineering peer
review evaluation of proposals. The business and contractual aspects,
including cost, will also be considered as a part of the evaluation.
The purpose of the evaluation will be to determine the relative merit
of the technical approach proposed in each response to the BAA.
Evaluation and selection of proposals for awards will be made on the
basis of the potential benefits occurring to the Government when
weighted against the cost of the proposal. Additional primary
considerations will include an independent Government assessment of the
probability of success of the proposed approach and the availability of
funding. Proposals submitted in response to this BAA will be evaluated
as received. Proposals not considered to have sufficient scientific
merit or relevance to the Army's needs, or those in areas for which
funds are not expected to be available, may be rejected without further
review. It is the policy of this Directorate to treat all proposals as
privileged information before award and to disclose the contents for
evaluation purposes only. All reviewers are made aware that proposals
shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part, for
any purpose other than to evaluate, without written permission of the
offeror. Any contract awarded, on the basis of a proposal submitted
under this BAA, will control disclosure and use of proprietary
information. The Government contemplates award of Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee
(CPFF) type contract(s) for awards resulting from this BAA, however,
proposals based on a different type contract will be considered.
PROPOSAL EVALUATION FACTORS: The following proposal evaluation factors
are listed in order of importance: 1. The overall scientific or
technical merits of the proposal. a. The extent to which the proposed
approaches are improvements over the methods presently used. New or
unique ideas/approaches will be given special consideration if based on
sound scientific principles. b. The degree to which the
proposaladdresses the technical goals listed in this BAA topic
description. 2. The offeror's understanding of the problem, as
reflected in the effectiveness and efficiency of the offeror's proposed
program for arriving at a proof-of-concept demonstration of developed
technologies. 3. The potential contributions of the proposed effort to
the NVESD mission as it related to the Forward Looking Sensors
program. 4. The offeror's capabilities, record of past performance in
related efforts, and the adequacy of the proposed facilities of the
project. 5. The qualifications, capabilities and related experience of
the proposed principal investigator, team leader, and other key
personnel. 6. The reasonableness and realism of the proposed costs and
fees for the proposed effort and availability of funds. CONTENTS: An
original and three copies of the proposal shall be submitted. Offerors
should indicate if the proposed effort is the subject of an on-going
IR&D program and provide a copy of the project data sheet (DTIC Form
271). Proposals submitted should be based on the information contained
in this BAA. No additional written information will be provided. All
proposals must include the following sections: Title page, Proposal
Synopsis, Description of Concept, Theoretical Background, Supporting
Data, Research Plan, Demonstration, Personnel, and Cost. Technical
proposals are not to exceed a total of 40 pages in length (double
spaced on 8.5 x 11 inch paper) exclusive of figures, tables,
references, biographical sketches and cost proposal data. The technical
proposal consists of the proposal synopsis, description of concept,
theoretical background, supporting data, and research plan. 1. The
TITLE PAGE should have the proposal title, date, the name, and
telephone number of the author or other points of contact and the name
of the organization submitting the proposal. 2. The PROPOSAL SYNOPSIS
should summarize the proposed concept, objectives, how the objectives
will be accomplished and the anticipated outcome. The reader of this
synopsis should gain an overview of all aspects of the proposal. The
synopsis should be limited to one (1) page. 3. The DESCRIPTION OF
CONCEPT (with diagrams as needed) should thoroughly describe the
concept, how it works, and what equipment is required. The anticipated
benefit to the Army and the projected fielded implementation should be
described. 4. The THEORETICAL BACKGROUND should describe the
theoretical and analytical development of the concept. This should be
in sufficient detail so that all theoretical concepts and the overall
theoretical framework is explained. Supporting calculations and
analyses are appropriate to this section. This section should make a
clear connection of the theory to the specific application of mine
detection. 5. The SUPPORTING DATA should include the scientific data
that supports the concept with appropriate references. Data obtained
from laboratory or field experiments is acceptable. The relevance of
the data to the proposed techniques must be clearly explained. 6. The
RESEARCH PLAN (Statement of Work) should describe in detail how the
objectives of the proposed work will be achieved. This section should
describe a logical, scientifically sound approach to reaching the goals
of the project. A Program Chart, which includes a detailed list of
Tasks and Subtasks and the duration of same must be provided. Offerors
are to clearly identify a list of contract deliverables which are
trackable to the Chart. The milestones should include the time frames
for preparation, delivery, review and approval for all draft and final
reports, and demonstrations as appropriate. After reading this
section, the reader should understand all research issues and how each
one will be investigated. 7. Each proposed effort should include at
least one DEMONSTRATION that is structured to clearly demonstrate the
potential contribution of this effort to the Forward Looking Sensors
program. This section should describe the demonstration in detail
including all procedures, protocols, and controls. 8. The names, title
and proposed roles of key PERSONNEL to be employed in the conduct of
this effort should be included with brief resumes detailing pertinent
accomplishments and publications. If the principal investigator and/or
other key personnel severs connection with the organization or is
unable to continue active participation, the Government must be
notified, and has the option to terminate the contract. 9. The
offeror's COST Proposal is to be prepared in a clear and concise manner
which accurately reflects the offeror's financial plan for
accomplishing the proposed technical effort. A breakdown of cost data
is required under this BAA. The Cost Proposal should include: an
estimate of the total research project cost with a breakdown of costs
by category and year, along with support for direct, and indirect labor
costs, and related material, travel, other direct costs (to include
publication, report and consultant costs. A monthly expenditure profile
containing a breakout of projected funding which is commensurate with
the proposed level of effort, technical approach, and milestones.
(0126) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0001 19970509\A-0001.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|