|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 11,1997 PSA#1864Cdr, U.S. Army Chemical and Biological Defense Command, Procurement,
Attn: AMSCB-PCB, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5423 A -- ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR ASSEMBLED CHEMICAL WEAPON ASSESSMENT
SOL DAAM01-97-R-0031 DUE 082997 POC Mr. Eric Braerman, Contract
Specialist, ph. (410)671-4469, Fax (410)671-4549; Mr. Charles A.
Comaty, Contracting Officer, ph. (410)671-3750, Fax (410)671-4549
E-MAIL: Chemical and Biological Defense Command,
ewbraerm@cbdcom.apgea.army.mil; cacomaty@cbdcom.apgea.army.mil.
Solicitation Purpose -- The Program Manager for Assembled Chemical
Weapon Assessment (ACWA) intends to identify "total solution"
alternatives to incineration for the disposal of assembled chemical
weapons and to select at least two technologies for demonstration
testing in late 1998. Technologies that do not provide a "total
solution" or can not meet the aggressive demonstration testing schedule
can be submitted for evaluation under a forthcoming, separate Broad
Agency Announcement (BAA). Program Overview -- In accordance with
Public Law 104-208, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Technology has appointed the Program Manager for Assembled Chemical
Weapon Assessment (ACWA) with the mission to demonstrate at least two
alternate technologies to incineration for the disposal of assembled
chemical weapons. The search for alternate technologies has been
directed to academic, commercial, government and international entities
to reach as wide a base as possible. The selection criteria for
choosing candidate technologies for demonstration testing will be
developed in conjunction with stakeholders and used in a technology
assessment conducted by a Program Evaluation Team. The technologies
offered for consideration are required to provide a total solution.
Specifically, the technologies must be presented in a system sense,
clearly demonstrating the ability to deal with all components and
process related materials of a fully assembled chemical weapon. These
component/materials encompass at a minimum the chemical agents GB, VX,
and H; fuses; explosives; propellant; metal parts; fiberglass
containing PCB; wooden and fiber board dunnage; protective clothing
consisting of butyl rubber, chlorinated polymers and silicon rubber;
various plant process waste including aqueous decon solutions,
synthetic/hydrocarbon hydraulic fluids, pumps, valves, motors, and
mechanical equipment; and carbon filter media. Additional Program
information was provided in an earlier CBD Announcement dated 21
February 1997 (On-line version), and 25 February 1997 (print version).
Technology Assessment Process -- In order to identify alternatives to
incineration and select a minimum of two technologies for
demonstration testing, the Department of Defense (DoD) has developed a
four step process. Stakeholders will be invited to participate in each
step of the process. In the first step, offeror proposals will be
evaluated for overall responsiveness as well as against the threshold
("go/no go") criteria described below. As a result of this evaluation,
contracts will be awarded to all offerors whose technology meets the
threshold criteria and are responsive to the Solicitation requirements.
In the second step, the Program Evaluation Team will conduct an initial
assessment of the selected candidate technologies (using the developed
program evaluation criteria) and prepare a list of data gaps that need
to be resolved before a final assessment can be performed on each
technology. Each offeror that is selected in the first step willreceive
$50,000 to prepare a test plan (requiring DoD approval), and
subsequently perform testing to fill the data gaps. Any costs in excess
of the amount will be at the offerors' expense. In the third step, the
Program Evaluation Team will perform a final assessment (using the
program evaluation criteria) of each of the technologies using the
information collected in response to the data gaps and the original
proposal. As a result of this assessment, the Program Evaluation Team
Will recommend, to the extent possible, a minimum of two technologies
for demonstration testing. The offerors recommended for demonstration
testing will be requested to prepare a work plan (requiring DoD
approval) for the demonstration testing. In the fourth step, the DoD
will oversee and validate the selected offerors' demonstration test
program and data. The results of the demonstration testing will be
evaluated by the Program Evaluation Team and recommendation will be
provided to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Technology by the PM for Assembled Chemical Weapon Assessment. The DoD
will summarize findings and recommendations in a report to Congress.
Solicitation Evaluation Criteria -- The proposals will be evaluated
against the following criteria: (A) Responsiveness to the solicitation
requirements. (B) Threshold ("go/no go") criteria: 1. The technology
must be a total ACWA Program solution for at least one single
agent-filled munitions type (M55 GB Rocket or M55 VX Rocket, etc.). The
proposed solution may include use of the existing reverse assembly
process to access the components (i.e., agent, metal parts, energetics,
and dunnage/packaging); 2. The treatment process must be an alternative
to baseline incineration; 3. The technology must utilize processes and
equipment that are developed or capable of being developed in time to
meet (not extend) the current ACWA program schedule; 4.
Laboratory-scale testing must have been completed with agent(s) or
chemicals with similar properties to agent to support the viability of
the technology being proposed; 5. Laboratory-scale testing must have
been completed with energetic(s) or chemicals with similar properties
to energetics to support the viability of the technology being
proposed; and, 6. Technology providers must have the legal right to use
any proprietary technology for testing and demonstration purposes, as
evidenced by unencumbered ownership or by an existing licensing or
other agreement granting such right. C. Program evaluation
criteria-Process efficacy, Public Health and Environment, Safety, Cost,
and Schedule. D. Past performance. Only responsiveness and threshold
criteria will be used for initial contract award. The program
evaluation criteria will be used during the identification of data
gaps, subsequent final assessment, and the exercise of the contract
options to proceed to demonstration testing. Past performance will be
used when exercising the option to proceed to demonstration testing.
The aforementioned threshold ("go/no go") and program evaluation
criteria are currently in draft form, and subject to revision prior to
RFP release based on in-process stakeholder meetings. Solicitation
Description -- The target date for release of the RFP is 14 July 1997,
with offerors' proposals due 45 days later. Due to the aggressive ACWA
program schedule, the DoD will not grant time extensions for proposal
submission. The RFP will require offerors to describe their "total
solution" to demilitarizing assembled chemical weapons. Contracts will
be awarded to offerors whose proposals are responsive to the
solicitation requirements and pass the thresholds ("go/no go")
criteria. Each contract awarded will fund successful offerors the same
fixed amount for providing/developing additional data to the DoD for
technical assessment. Contracts will contain an option for development
of a technical work plan for continuing into the demonstration phase,
as well as an option for conducting a technology demonstration. These
options will be awarded only to the offerors whose technical solutions
are selected for technology demonstration. A pre-solicitation
conference will be held 25-27 June 1997 at the Chemical
Demilitarization Training Facility (CDTF) located at the Edgewood Area,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. The DoD will present an overview of the
ACWA program including program objectives, milestones/schedule,
procurement approach, stakeholder concerns, and the technology
assessment process. A tour of the CDTF will be conducted to familiarize
offerors with the current reverse assembly process for munitions.
Following the CDTF tour, a question and answer session will be held. To
encourage teaming to achieve a total system solution, 20 minute
time-slots have been allotted at this conference for offerors to
present an overview of their proposed technology/approach. These
presentations will be held as an open forum and offerors should not
present proprietary or confidential information. Pre-registration for
this conference is required. Please contact Kimberly Collins, Horne
Engineering Services, Inc. (888-482-4312) or E-mail
(kcollins@horne.com) by 17 June 1997 to register for the
pre-solicitation conference. To access more information on the ACWA
program through the internet, see the program's home page at
http://www.cbdcom.apgea.army.mil/Staff/Public Affairs/pm_frame.html.
(0160) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0006 19970611\A-0006.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|