|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 16,1997 PSA#1888AFFTC/PKAE Directorate of Contracting, 5 S. Wolfe Ave, Edwards AFB, CA
93524-1185 A -- INTEGRATED HIGH PAYOFF ROCKET PROPULSION TECHNOLOGY (IHPRPT) III
PROGRAM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ANNOUNCEMENT (PART 2 OF 2) SOL PRDA
97-02-PKAE DUE 080197 POC Barbara Barcelona, Contract Negotiator,
AFFTC/PKAE, 805-277-3900, ext. 2214 and P.J. Barnhill, Contracting
Officer, AFFTC/PKAE, 805-277-3900, ext. 2235. WEB: Click here for
On-Line Acquisition Solicitation Information System at Edwards AFB,
CA., http://cpf.edwards.af.mil/contract/rfp.html. E-MAIL: Click email
link to contact the POC., barcelob%pk@mhs.elan.af.mil. INTRODUCTION:
Integrated High Payoff Rocket Propulsion Technology III. This
announcement is in two parts. Part 2 of 2, PRDA 97-02-PKAE. BASIS OF
AWARD: The Government reserves the right to select for contract award
any, all, part or none of the proposals received in response to this
announcement. Multiple awards to the same topic area are also possible.
The selection of the sources for contract award for each topic shall be
based upon an integrated best value assessment considering technical
merit and cost/price. A scientific and engineering evaluation will be
conducted on all proposals received. The purpose of this evaluation is
to determine the relative merit of the technical approach proposed in
response to this announcement. This evaluation shall consider
technical aspects and cost as related to technical effort. The same
criteria will be used for the abstracts and the full proposals. The
technical evaluation area will be ranked as first priority in the
evaluation. The cost area, while considered substantial, will be second
in priority. The technical evaluation will be based on the following
criteria. Criteria 1 and 2 are of equal importance to each other and
most important in the technical area. Criteria 3 and 4 are also of
equal importance to each other, but are of less importance than
criteria 1 and 2. The Technical area criteria are: 1. Soundness of
offeror's technical approach with regards to feasibility of the
project, probability of the technology being a viable candidate for
selection/application into an operational system, and understanding the
scope of the technical effort. 2. Relevance of the proposed effort to
the achievement/demonstration of the goals of the Integrated High
Payoff Rocket Propulsion Technology (IHPRPT) program. 3. Innovation and
creativity of the proposed solution to meeting the technical objectives
as stated. 4. Capability of the offeror to successfully accomplish the
proposed effort, which includes relevant past/present performance, the
availability of the necessary resources such as experienced and
competent technical and management personnel, and the availability,
from any source, of required laboratory, shop, and test facilities.
Organization and clarity of information are critical to all of the
evaluation criteria for both the abstract and the full proposal. Cost,
which includes consideration of proposed budgets and funding profiles,
and cost elements as they relate to the technical effort are the second
evaluation area. It is anticipated that adequate price competition
(APC) will be achieved between the offers received for a particular
topic. If, after step 1, it appears APC will exist in a particular
topic, full cost proposals will not be solicited for the selected
abstracts. Only that data deemed essential for determining a fair and
reasonable contract price and for the performance of a cost realism
analysis will be requested. [Cost Criteria (a) and (c) below apply.] If
APC is not achieved on a particular topic, the offerors of the selected
abstracts will be requested to submit cost or pricing data IAW FAR
15.804-6. [Cost Criteria (a), (b), and (c) below apply.] The cost
evaluation criteria will include: (a) reasonableness, realism, and
completeness of cost in relation to the technical risk; (b) basis of
estimated engineering, fabrication, and test costs; and (c) appropriate
distribution and adequacy of estimated costs in relation to elements of
the proposed technical effort. Those offerors electing to submit a full
proposal in the absence of an invitation shall submit cost or pricing
data IAW FAR 15.804-6. No further evaluation criteria will be used in
selecting the abstracts and proposals. The technical and cost
information will be evaluated at the same time. GENERAL INFORMATION: To
obtain the Supplemental Package offerors should contact the Contract
Negotiator, Ms. Barbara Barcelona, at AFFTC/PKAE, (805) 277-3900,
extension 2214. All information contained in this synopsis and
companion supplemental package is available electronically via the
On-Line Acquisition Solicitation Information System (OASIS) at Edwards
AFB, CA. See below for address. Questions of a technical nature
regarding the IHPRPT program and this PRDA should be directed to Mr.
Joseph H. Hildreth, OL-AC PL/RKEM, (805) 275-5338. Technical questions
specific to a particular topic should be directed to the POC indicated
in the topic description found in the Supplemental Package. Abstracts
and proposals in response to this PRDA shall reference the technical
project being proposed against as well as PRDA 97-02-PKAE. Abstracts
and proposals submitted after the respective cutoff dates specified
herein shall be treated in accordance with the restrictions of FAR
52.215-10. A copy of this provision may be obtained from the
contracting point of contact. Anticipated types of contracts to be
awarded are cost-plus-fixed-fee or cost share. Other contract types
will be considered if proposed and substantiated. It is anticipated
that awards will begin in October 1997. Offerors should state that
their proposals will be valid for 180 days from submission. The
Government reserves the right to award contracts up to 1 year from
issuance of this announcement. The cost of preparing abstracts and
proposals in response to this announcement is not an allowable direct
charge to any resulting contract or any other contract, but it may be
an allowable expense to normal bid and proposal indirect cost specified
in FAR 31.205-18. The Air Force reserves the right to amend this PRDA
to allow for subsequent submission dates for abstracts. This
announcement constitutes the only published solicitation for this
requirement. A formal Request for Proposal (RFP) will not be issued.
Request for Proposal letters will be sent only to those offerors
participating in Step 1 and selected in accordance with the abstract
evaluation criteria. Offerors should be alert for any PRDA amendments
that may be published. Note: Offerors are advised that only contracting
officers are legally authorized to commit the Government. All
responsible sources may submit an abstractand proposal which shall be
considered by the Air Force. ACQUISITION MILESTONES -- ABSTRACTS DUE:
01AUG97; INVITATIONS TO STEP 2 TO OFFERORS: 14AUG97; PROPOSAL
SUBMISSIONS DUE: Group 1 Topics-15SEP97; Group 2 Topics-25SEP97; Group
3 Topics-29OCT97; CONTRACT AWARDS: BEGIN OCT 97. See Supplemental
Package Part I Topic Descriptions for groupings. (End of Part 2)
(0192) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0004 19970716\A-0004.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|