|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 25,1997 PSA#1895COMMANDING OFFICER, ATTN NAVFAC CONTRACTS OFFICE CODE 27, NCBC 1000
23RD AVE, PORT HUENEME, CA 93043-4301 F -- BAA FOR CONTAINMENT AND/OR ELIMINATION OF EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED
WITH CUTTING AND GOUGING OPERATIONS DURING SHIP DISMANTLING, REPAIR AND
CONSTRUCTION. SOL N47408-97-R-1863 BAA ANNOUNCEMENT DUE 091697 POC
Contract Specialist, PAULETTE K. PETERSON, 805-982-5081 This
announcement constitutes a Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) for the
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC) under FAR 6.102
(d)(2) to solicit information. NFESC in cooperation with the Naval
Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD), West Bethesda, MD
is seeking information on innovative technologies providing
significant reduction of emissions associated with cutting (oxy fuel,
plasma arc and oxygen lance) and arc-gouging operation at Navy
industrial facilities. Pollution prevention control technologies that
focus on the front-end pollution prevention are of particular interest,
although end-of-pipe technologies are included in this announcement.
The technology will be applied primarily in shipyards but it could have
applications at other Navy activities. The definition of innovative
technology is any technology which is significantly better, cheaper,
and faster than existing technologies that is not broadly applied due
to limited knowledge or established standards within theNavys
engineering community. To be eligible for Navy consideration and
possible award of a demonstration contract, the new and innovative
technology must be in the Advanced Development Stage, not requiring
further technology research or design development prior to field
demonstration and be capable of full scale implementation if the
demonstration is successful. Technologies that can eliminate/capture
the emissions, can be fully demonstrated/validated, can be scaled for
the Navys needs, and can be implemented within 1-2 years are of
greatest interest to the Navy. All innovative technologies/solutions
that meet the objectives of this investigation, whether front-end or
end-of- pipe, will be reviewed. Protection of the welders health and
safety and environmental protection are of primary interest when
evaluating the equipment. Another important consideration for
evaluating technologies includes portability, so the equipment can be
used in dry-docks for cutting operations and in a more compact form for
use aboard ships and inside confined spaces such as tanks. Additional
factors include the ease of use and the safety of maintenance personnel
when servicing the technology, noise generation, ergonomic effects on
the welder, and weld metal quality including chemistry, tensile and
toughness properties and radiographic soundness. Technologies that
reduce the volume or improve the management of particulate related slag
are also of interest. We are particularly interested in addressing
emissions from on-hull and off-hull cutting operations performed during
the dismantling/recycling of submarines and surface craft. During these
operations, large steel sections are selected and cut into manageable
size pieces prior to being removed from the hull. Personnel must
maneuver over and sometimes, within the submarine, to perform cutting
operations necessary to dismantle hull sections and remove ship
equipment. Once dislodged, many of these sections are taken to off-hull
locations for further cutting and size reduction prior to domestic
smelting. Other sections are disposed in landfills depending on their
type and level of contamination. Both on-hull and off-hull cutting
operation generate large plumes of particulate, gases, fumes, and
vapors. These plumes contain hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) that
include heavy metals (such as manganese, chromium, and nickel), metal
oxides (chromium oxide), particulate, and may contain compounds such as
NOx, SOx, CO, etc. that can be produced as a result of cutting/burning
depending on the cleanliness of the cut area. The EPA has identified
189 elements which are considered HAPs. These materials will be
restricted under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for shipbuilding and ship repair operations. The
NESHAP is mandated by the Clean Air Act Amendment of 1990 and will
impact welding, cutting and gouging operations in Navy ship
construction, repair and recycling. Health standards organizations,
such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and
theAmerican Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH),
propose to reduce the occupational exposure limits for Cr(VI), Mn, and
Ni to .5/5.0 ug/m3, 200 ug/m3 and 50/100 ug/m3 respectively. The
proposed Cr(VI) could be as low as 1/200th of its current exposure
limit action level. Therefore, in order to comply with NESHAP, as well
as OSHA and EPA requirements, the Navy and other ship repair
facilities must contain and control air emissions associated with these
industrial processes. This includes characterizing actual emissions and
identifying/implementing proven, mature, cost effective and efficient
emissions elimination, control and/or containment
processes/technologies at Navy industrial facilities. Some attempts at
fume control have been made at off-hull cutting locations using
containment. However, the effectiveness of this practice has not yet
been fully determined and does not impact emissions generated during
on-hull cutting operations at dry dock locations. Potential problem
areas at Naval Shipyards include emissions from cutting operations
performed on ship superstructures extending out of the dry dock, at
off-hull locations, and inside the dry dock where the resultant plumes
extend beyond the recessed area. These emissions have become more
frequent in recent years due an increase in the number of
decommissioned submarines and surface ships that are being dismantled
annually. The Navy is interested in innovative solutions/equipment
including engineering controls, process modifications and alternative
practices that can reduce or eliminate emissions from cutting and arc
gouging operations. Implementing one or more types of engineering
controls will likely be most practical and cost effective since
equipment designed for a persons individual protection will not address
emissions to the environment. Similarly, process modifications, such as
reducing torch gas flow and or tip size, will likely reduce the cut
width and make it harder or impossible to remove large sections from
the hull. The Navy hasidentified and is currently evaluating equipment
for reducing/eliminating emissions generated during welding
operations. None appear to be adequate for application in ship
dismantling operations in that they can not be conveniently/
practically maneuvered for on-hull use, have an unacceptable impact on
cutting operations (time, etc.), do not adequately address/eliminate
emissions to the environment or are not sufficient to contain the heavy
emissions and spatter that occurs during cutting and gouging
operations. Interested parties should send an original and two copies
of the abstract to DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, CBC Code 272311 BLDG 41,
1000 23RD AVENUE, PORT HUENEME, CA 93043-4301. Abstracts must be
submitted in printed form on paper. Do not submit abstracts via e-mail,
videotape, computer diskettes or other non-paper material. For
technical information regarding this BAA, contact Kathleen Paulson at
(805) 982-4984. There is no commitment by the Navy to make any contract
award, nor to be responsible for any funds expended by the offeror
before the award of a demonstration contract, should it occur. Multiple
contracts may result, with award not exceeding $425,000 for each
contract award. Award resulting from this announcement is subject to
funding and site availability. Submittals to this BAA shall be in
abstract form describing the merits and objectives of what the
contractor is offering. The abstract (not a sales brochure) shall be
titled and shall identify the BAA number and title, offerors name and
address, telephone number fax number and e-mail address. The submittal
shall concisely describe what the contractor is offering the Navy with
sections on (a) The overall innovativeness, scientific/technical merit
and objectives of the offer. Commentary should include required
utilities, system footprint and other support requirements, a process
flow diagram, emissions data and removal efficiency. (b) The offerors
capabilities, related experience techniques and unique combination of
these which are integral factors in achieving the offeror's proposed
objectives. (c) The qualifications capabilities and experience of the
principal investigator, team leader or key personnel who are critical
in achieving the objectives of the offer. (d) The reasonableness of
cost relative to the proposed scientific /technical approach or other
relative cost data. The responder should provide an estimate for system
acquisition costs including: consumable replacement, labor,
maintenance, construction and site preparation costs. The abstract,
submitted as an original with two copies, shall be no longer than three
pages, single-sided and 12 pitch. One attachment of up to 10 pages
(single-sided) of test data may be submitted as an attachment to the
abstract. It should contain OSH, environmental and metal test summaries
of previous test demonstrations and projects to support the contractors
proposed scientific/technical approach. It should provide data from the
initial plume samples or other test matrix characterizations, final
analysis, how the test data was validated and any patents pending
and/or issued. Clearly identify all proprietary and cost information
that is not to be published or disseminated. Abstract submittals to
this BAA will be reviewed by a NFESC Technical Evaluation Board.
Abstracts are not evaluated against each other since each is a unique
technology with no common work statement. Based on the abstract review
results, and subject to availability of funds and demonstration sites,
respondents with an equipment technology found to have merit for
specific Navy locations will be sent site specific information and
asked for as full technical and cost proposal for a potential contract
award. The purpose of any resulting contract will be to demonstrate
and conduct a full scale implementation project to solve the Navys
cutting and arc-gouging emission concern. Deadline for receipt of
abstract is 16 September 1997. (0204) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0036 19970725\F-0002.SOL)
F - Natural Resources and Conservation Services Index Page
|
|