|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 28,1997 PSA#1896Office of Naval Research, 800 North Quincy St., Arlington, VA
22217-5660 A -- INTEGRATED IRS/ELRF RISK MITIGATION SENSOR FOR AIRBORNE TEST AND
EVALUATION SOL BAA 97-027 DUE 091197 POC Lambert McCullough 251, ONR
BAA 97-027 The Office of Naval Research (ONR 313) with technical
support from Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, is
soliciting proposals for an Infrared Search and Track (IRST) system
integrated with an eyesafe laser range finder (ELRF) to perform risk
mitigation for an airborne (high altitude unmanned aerial vehicle
(UAV)) boost phase intercept weapon system for interception of theater
ballistic missiles (TBMs). The Government intends to use the IRST/ELRF
in an airborne demonstration on an E-2C aircraft. The risk mitigation
sensor should be adaptable to a UAV platform. The first phase of the
referenced risk mitigation (16-18 month sensor development) is to be
followed by a separately costed second phase which addresses the
integration of the sensor with the E-2C platform and related flight
test support. The objective of the proposed phase 1 effort is to
develop sensor systems with dedicated apertures for wide field of view
(WFOV) search and narrow field of view (NFOV) fire control,with the
ELRF sharing the aperture with the fire control (NFOV) system. Ideally
the search and fire control functions (working in conjunction with
each other) should be fully independent and capable of simultaneous
operation. The primary risk areas this sensor is intended to resolve
are the following: (a) Timelines for: detection (with and without
external cueing) track establishment typing (optional)* reacquisition
(minimum of 2 targets). (b) Range Performance: The desired performance
for the risk mitigation sensor is: WFOV search sensor -- Detection of
TBM's (typically > 200 km) against several types of background
clutter (e.g., earth, sky, cloud) NFOV fire control sensor -- track of
TBM targets (typically > 200 km) after hand-off from search sensor.
ELRF -- Range to TBM targets (typically > 75 km) for a cloud free
line of sight (CFLOS)in mid-latitude winter (MLW) from 20,000 ft.
altitude in 23 km visibility). (c) Precision 3-D Tracking: The sensor
suite must demonstrate 3-D track accuracy of 100 meters per axis (1 s).
This will be required to support postulated boost phase interceptors
with a varying range of performance. This effort is intended to draw on
existing components and subsystems which may be releasable to a foreign
government by the end of CY99 . This consideration is expected to limit
focal plane arrays (FPAs) to 480 x 640 (or smaller) InSb (Indium
Antimonide) operating at 30 to 60 Hz frame rates, and laser systems to
energy levels of < 150 mJ in the eyesafe waveband and operating at
maximum pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 20 Hz. A more complete
listing of required system characteristics is available upon request
from the technical point of contact at ONR identified below. In
addition since initial flight testing of this hardware is planned for
an E-2C aircraft, an Interface Control Document (ICD) is also available
to qualified U. S. contractors from the ONR technical point of contact.
The proposal solicited is for a complete IRST system; however, only
rudimentary signal processing functions (e.g., Non-Uniformity
Correction (NUC)), pointing, etc.) are intended for release to the
foreign government. Thus, consideration shall be given to make
non-releasable elements easily separable by hosting the required higher
order algorithms (e.g., false alarm rejection, multi-target [at least
2] tracking, typing [optional], aim point biasing for the ELRF, 3-D
track file generation, etc.) in a separate processor. The Government
estimated cost for the IRST/ELRF risk mitigation sensor development is
less than $8M. This notice constitutes a broad agency announcement in
accordance with FAR 6.102(d)(2). No Request For Proposals (RFP),
solicitation or other announcement of this opportunity will be made.
Awards may take the form of contracts, grants or cooperative
agreements. For awards made as contracts the socio-economic merits of
each proposal will be evaluated based on the commitment to provide
meaningful subcontracting opportunities for small business, small
disadvantaged business, women-owned business concerns, historically
black colleges and universities, and minority institutions. The
standard industrial classification code is 8731 with the small business
size standard of 500. Any large business, university or nonprofit
organization submitting a proposal of $500,000 or more shall also
submit its Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business
Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9. This announcement
will be open for 45 days from the date of first publication.
Interested offerors can obtain relevant descriptive documents
(recommended sensor characteristics, E-2C ICD) from Mr. Buss. All
offerors should submit five (5) copies of their proposals which meet
the following limitations: Technical Proposal: maximum of 50 pages
(Helvetica font size 12, 1 inch margin, single sided page) The
technical proposal should be prepared using the following format: (a)
Cover page, clearly labeled IRST/LRF Risk Mitigation Sensor (b)
Executive summary-maximum 3 pages (c) Background (5-10 pages) --
Description of relevant background qualifying the offeror as a bidder
under this solicitation. Examples would be previous related development
and/or production efforts, critical subsystem developments, etc. (d)
Proposed approach (20-30 pages)- Includes analytical basis for dual
aperture sizing, laser type, energy, PRF, pointing and stabilization
error budgets, and predictions for achievable 3-D track accuracy.
Hardware and software selections/legacies to address risk mitigation
issues. Detailed description of integrated IRST/LRF approach. (e)
Considerations for flight testing aboard an E-2C (5-10 pages) -- This
section should address how the proposed approach meets E-2C restriction
on volume, weight, power and impact of E-2C environment (temperature,
altitudes, vibration, etc.) on proposed sensor performance. (f)
Descriptions of key personnel (3-5 pages) -- Identify personnel
critical to the execution of this program and previous relevant
experience. Cost Proposal: maximum of 20 pages (Helvetica font size 12,
1 inch margin, single sided page). The cost proposal should address the
following issues: (a) This is a two phase effort. Phase I is the Risk
Mitigation sensor only. Phase II is integration and flight test
support. Cost proposal should be prepared in 2 parts and submitted
separately. (b) All optional items (e.g., typing, star tracking) should
be costed separately as individually executable items. (c) Costing
information for phase 2 should include the level of IRST/ELRF
contractor support for aircraft integration (based on level of risk
mitigation sensor adherence to the ICD), up to 15 flights, and
maintenance of sensor throughout the flight test. (d) Supporting cost
rationale may be requested as required. Submit proposals directly to:
Office of Naval Research Attn: Code 313 (BAA#IRST/LRF) 800 N. Quincy
St. Arlington, VA 22217-5660 A single award is anticipated, but the
Government reserves the right to select for award more than oneof the
proposals. Evaluation of proposals will be performed by a panel of
government experts from ONR, NAWCWD, and BMDO based on the following
criteria in order of importance: (1) Potential significance and value
of effort to Navy/BMDO TBM intercept in the boost phase as described in
the Specification and the ICD (interface elements only). (2)
Suitability of technology for transfer to Israel (except those items
specifically identified as not releasable, e.g., laser rangefinder,
higher order signal processing) (3) Overall scientific and technical
merits based on availability and maturity of proposed hardware/software
in the time frame (for proposed hardware release by end of CY99) for
delivery of the completed system. (4) Cost realism (tasking vs. cost
estimate) (5) Offerors capabilities and related experience, including
(a) the qualifications and experience of the principal investigator or
team leader, as well as personnel who are critical to program success,
(b) facilities, (c) techniques, or (d) unique combinations thereof
which are integral factors for achieving the proposed objectives.
Awards will be based on merit and funding availability. Contact Point:
Questions regarding proposal preparation, business issues, and legal
matters relating to the BAA shall be submitted in writing to: Office of
Naval Research, Attn: Mr. Lambert McCullough, Code ONR 251, 800 N.
Quincy St., Arlington, VA 22217-5660. Material may be faxed to him at
703-696-0093. Technical questions should be addressed to Office of Navy
Research, Attn: Mr. James R. Buss, Code 313, 800 N. Quincy St.
Arlington, VA 22217-5660, telephone (703) 696-0590, fax 703-696-1331.
(0205) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0003 19970728\A-0003.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|