Commanding Officer, Engineering Field Activity West, 900 Commodore Dr. San Bruno, CA 94066-5006

C -- A-E SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE E-2C AIRCRAFT FROM NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS) MIRAMAR, CA TO A PROPOSED SITE AT NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION (NAWS) POINT MUGU, CA SOL N62474-97-C-1627 POC Debbie Sivell, Contract Specialist, Code 0213DS, (415) 244-2483, M. Walker, Contracting Officer. Design and Engineering is required for E-2C Aircraft Support, Maintenance and Training Facilities (including Fixed Point Utility Systems, Carrier Deck Lighting and LSO Systems) and renovation of various existing office and aircraft support facilities at Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS), Point Mugu, California. Most work will involve renovation of existing facilities with new stand-alone construction comprising a small percentage of the total program. A SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) may be required. Services will include program management, utility planning and engineering, site engineering, industrial engineering, collateral equipment identification and selection, design and technical data package preparation, and construction contract support services. Coordination with other projects affected by this program may also be required. Multiple construction bid document packages may be required. Design start and completion of some of the projects will be staggered, but will be designed concurrently in a very tight time frame with the current goal of design completion as early as 1 March 1998. A separate National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation contract may have some impact on design efforts to be developed under this procurement. The estimated contract award date is October 1997. The estimated contract completion date is December 1999. The following criteria (listed in descending order of importance) will be used for selection. In order to expedite your firm's consideration, the following information shall be substituted for Blocks 7, 8, 9, and 10 in the SF 255: 1. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: (a) Relevant technical and/or managerial qualifications of key individuals. Submit a table (rows and columns) of the following information for proposed key individuals: Name, firm name, office location, proposed project assignment, percent of time to be spent on this contract, highest education level/discipline (example: BS, mechanical engineering), states ofprofessional registration, number of years of professional experience, number of years with the firm. Also, for project managers/team leaders, identify the number of projects and project size they have managed over the past five years. (b) Demonstrated recent experience (within the past 5 years) of the firm and proposed key individuals in (1) designing similar facilities to Navy design criteria on an accelerated schedule within cost controls (List no more than 10 projects) (2) program management, and (3) working successfully with a team. Submit a table (rows and columns) of the most significant recent projects that demonstrate experience relevant to the proposed work. Indicate how each project is relevant to the work described herein, which proposed individuals worked on the project, and their position. Projects shall be in the left column and individual's names shown across the top row of the table. Provide a narrative for items (b)(2) and (b)(3). 2. PERFORMANCE: (a) Past performance ratings by Government and private industry with respect to compliance with schedules, work quality, and cost control. Provide performance ratings or letters of commendation for the projects cited as relevant experience above, if available. If the project is a DOD funded project, provide the contract number. Include those ratings for joint venture partners and subcontractors. Include the following data for each of the 10 projects listed as firm's experience: client's contact and telephone number, design completion date, construction completion date (planned or actual), and percent differential between contract award amount and estimated construction cost (note whether bid or negotiated); (b) Firm's Design Quality Control Plan (DQCP). Submit a concise outline of the firm's DQCP. 3. CAPACITY: (a) Capacity of the firm to accomplish several projects simultaneously on an accelerated schedule, (b) ability to sustain the loss of key personnel, while accomplishing work within required time limits. Provide a listing of present business commitments and their planned completion schedules. Submit an organization chart, depicting the proposed team and the relationship among members of the team. Indicate if back-up personnel are available. Provide a chart or graph (in number of hours) comparing available capacity in major technical diciplines with actual commitments for the next 12 months. 4. LOCATION: (a) Knowledge of the geographical location, climate, construction industry, materials, and supply availability, knowledge of regulatory requirements applicable to the site; and (b) ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support during construction. Annotate the table provided under element 1 above to indicate those recent relevant projects accomplished in a geographic area similar to the proposed work site. 5. USE OF RECOVERED MATERIALS, WASTE MINIMIZATION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Demonstrated success in prescribing the use of recovered materials and achieving waste reduction and energy efficiency in facility design. 6. SMALL BUSINESS (SB) AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS (SDB) UTILIZATION: Type of work and dollar percentage of the work to be accomplished by small business and small disadvantaged business (SDB) firms. 7. VOLUME OF WORK: Volume of work previously awarded by the Department of Defense (DOD) for the past 12 months to the firm with the objective of effecting equitable distribution of contracts among qualified Architect-Engineer firms, including minority-owned firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts. DO NOT PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION SINCE THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE DATA. The Estimated Construction Cost (ECC) is between $10,000,000 and $20,000,000. A secret security clearance is required. At the selection interview, A/E firms slated for interviews must submit their management approach, their specific quality control process, and a portfolio of design work. For consideration, each firm shall provide one submittal package, include one original SF 255 and one original SF 254. The SF 255 with attachments shall belimited to 30 printed pages, 8.5" X 11", with printing not smaller than 12 pitch. EVERY PAGE OF THE SUBMITTAL (INCLUDING COVER LETTERS AND TABLE OF CONTENTS) THAT IS NOT A SF 254 WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE PAGE COUNT. Any page beyond the 30 printed page limit will not be considered by the Selection Board. The submittal must be received at Building 205, 2nd Floor, Attention: Joyce De Ville not later than 3:00 p.m., local time at San Bruno, CA, 30 calendar days from the date this announcement appears in the CBD. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Include telefax numbers in Block 3a and Contractor Establishment Code (formerly the DUNS number), Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Codes, if known, and Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) in Block 3. Label lower right corner of outside mailing envelope with "A-E Services, N62474-97-C-1627". This is not a Request for Proposal (RFP). (0227)

Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0028 19970819\C-0002.SOL)