OICC ROICC Cherry Point, NAVFACENGCOM Contracts, PSC Box 8006, Cherry Point, North Carolina 28533-0006

C -- INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES SOL N62470-98-D-5361 DUE 031898 POC Contact Bobby Ewell, (919)466-4750, Contracting Officer, M. J. Patterson, CDR, CEC, USN This solicitation is for mechanical and electrical engineering design services for various projects at MCAS, Cherry Point, NC. This is NOT a request for proposals. This proposed contract is being solicited on an unrestricted basis. It shall have an initial term of one year and may be renewed for one additional year at the option of the Government. The maximum total fee (subject to necessary changes) shall not exceed $500,000.00 including the option year. Opening projects for this contract include, CP990M, Replace HVAC, Walls and Ceilings, Building 1701. Engineering Services are required for mechanical and electrical designs, field investigations, preparation of plans, specifications, cost estimates, related studies, and all associated engineering services, shop drawing review, and Quality Assurance Plan preparation (provides construction contract inspection requirements). Incidental architectural, structural, and civil engineering, and environmental considerations may be required on some projects. Experience is required in design of new and/or modifications to existing systems including: HVAC, steam, chilled water, heat pumps, compressed air, plumbing, fire protection systems, pneumatic and digital electric controls for mechanical systems, shelters and structural modifications related to mechanical systems, modifications to electrical power distribution systems, lighting, and architecturally related items such as roof repairs, doors, windows, ceilings, and wall construction necessary for a complete project. A working knowledge of destructive and non-destructive material sampling and testing techniques is required. Sampling and testing for lead paint, asbestos, and contaminated soils will be required. Several relatively small projects with quick turnaround time are anticipated. Firms are required to prepare cost estimates utilizing the computerized CES format, specifications in the SpecsIntact system format, and drawings shall be in AutoCad compatible format. Firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are required to submit one copy each of completed SF-254 and SF-255 forms. Copies of SF-254 forms are also required for proposed consultants and copies of SF-255 forms are encouraged for proposed consultants who are expected to contribute significantly to the contract. Inquires shall refer to contract number and title. The A&E must demonstrate his and each key consultant's qualifications with respect to the published evaluation factors for design and all option services. Evaluation factors (1) and (2) are of equal and greatest importance; factors (6), (7), and (8) are of lesser importance than factors (1) through (5). Pertinent statements relative to the evaluation factors shall be included in Part 10 of form SF-255. Superfluous information is discouraged. Firms responding by 4:00 p.m. EST, 18 March 1998 will be considered. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.2215-10. Specific evaluation factors include (1) Professional qualifications of the firm's proposed personnel and its consultants (if proposed), necessary for satisfactory performance of required services. Resumes shall be included only for key persons expected to perform work under this contract, shall identify anticipated role in performing contract work, shall show specific location of each persons assigned office, shall list specific training and certification, and shall highlight specific work experience applicable to this contract. (2) Specialized recent (within the last five years) experience of the firm (including consultants) and technical competence in the type of work required. Cite examples of prior work relationships) with proposed consultants/associates. In Part 8 of SF-255 provide a synopsis of the scope of work, year work completed, point of contact and telephone number for each project listed. Include only projects involving mechanical and electrical designs. Specific projects listed shall include a cross reference to the names of persons identified in evaluation factor 1 and briefly describe their role in the project. Provide evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the profession of engineering in the State of residence, i.e., state registration number. (3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. Describe knowledge of the work area at Cherry Point and outlying fields. In a maximum of one page, provide a narrative and/or chart or graph showing the anticipated backlog of work over the next twelve month period for key personnel proposed for use in this contract. Firms shall identify any major pending projects or organizations changes that could impact the ability to dedicate personnel and resources to this contract. Provide one page maximum for you and consultants that describes office automation support and systems and other supporting equipment (i.e., AutoCad, SpecsIntact). (4) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of demonstrated compliance with performance schedules and evidence of demonstrated long term business relationshipsand repeat business with Government and private customers. Firms may submit letters of commendation received for the specific projects identified in Part 8 of SF-255. (5) Quality and cost control. Provide a one page maximum summary of how your firm approaches internal quality control and cost control processes and procedures. Identify how these will be maintained for all work by multiple offices and consultants. Provide an example of your quality control program in action. (6) Demonstrated success in prescribing the use of recovered materials and achieving waste reduction and energy efficiency in facility design. Relate to personnel proposed and example projects listed, if possible. (7) Geographical office locations of the firm (including consultants) that will be involved in the contract. State anticipated mode of transportation to be used from each office and estimate approximate mileage and typical response time. Application of this criterion is contingent upon receiving an appropriate number of qualifiedfirms. (8) The volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense (DOD) shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of DOD architect-engineer contracts among qualified architect-engineer firms. (0040)

Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0024 19980211\C-0008.SOL)