Commanding Officer, Engineering Field Activity West, 900 Commodore Dr, San Bruno, CA 94066-5006

C -- INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACT FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS (ARCHITECTURAL) IN NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA SOL N62474-98-D-2051 DUE 042098 POC Barbara Lazara, Contract Specialist/Mark Pfeiffer, Contracting Officer, FAX No. (650) 244-2440 E-MAIL: Barbara Lazara, Contract Specialist, bjlazara@efawest.navfac.navy.mil. This modification of synopsis revises and adds to the original synopsis, which appeared in the Commerce Business Daily on Tuesday, 3 March 1998, issue # PSA-2043. REVISE: (1) EXPERIENCE: Recent specialized experience in the design of major (>$500,000) repairs and/or renovations of buildings; the design of new buildings, of various building types, ranging from $500,000 to $4,000,000; development of bid documents for design-build projects; and, prior experience in the successful execution of multiple projects on similar (i.e., indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ)) Architectural contracts. Recent experience is defined as that experience gained on representative projects completed during the past seven (7) consecutive year period; (2) QUALIFICATIONS: Professional qualifications of the staff, including in-house, teaming partners, and/or consultants, with respect to the overall makeup of the architectural/engineering team. The experience and roles of key design personnel, specifically on relatedprojects, and on other similar Architectural IDIQ contracts, as addressed in criteria element (1) above. is paramount. Criteria items (3) through (6), remain unchanged; item (7) is added, as follows: ADD: (7) If a "large business", the extent to which the firm identifies and plans to commit to small businesses; and, to small disadvantaged businesses, historically black colleges and universities (HBCU), and minority institution participation under the resulting contract, whether under joint venture, teaming arrangement, or consultant/subcontractor. This is a notice of intent to contract for architect-engineering services, and the only general notification to interested firms that will be made. All known information relating to the work which may be ordered under an ensuing IDIQ contract award, has been included in this general notification. This is not a solicitation (i.e., RFP or IFB). Bidders lists are not available. To facilitate comprehensive, thorough review of interested firms' qualifications, by Government technical evaluation boards, the following data shall be substituted in Blocks 7, 8, 9, and 10 of SF 255 (specifically address all criteria elements listed in Block 10): 1. To demonstrate how the firm meets the EXPERIENCE criteria: Provide a description of recent (within the last seven years) projects, relevant to the work described herein, for which the firm provided a significant technical contribution to its clients. In "matrix form", provide cross-reference identification of firm members and projects worked on. Projects shall be listed on the vertical axis (or left column) and firm member(s') names on the horizontal axis (or across the top row), of the matrix. In addition, provide a tabular listing of all performance ratings from both private and Government clients (identify DoD clients, specifically). If no rating, or other written indication of performance satisfaction by the client was received, so indicate. For each project, identify or otherwise designate the firm's role: prime contractor, jointventure partner, or subcontractor (including subordinate teaming partner and/or consultant). These ratings should be dated no earlier than January 1991, and should include all projects to which the firm made a significant contribution. The following data is to be included: the amount of contract award associated with A-E effort, performed by the firm (i.e., the amount actually paid to the firm for A-E work, and not to prime contractors when such work was performed by the firm in a subcontractor or consultant capacity); and contract type (e.g., fixed price or cost reimbursement). Identify points of contact (i.e., names and telephone numbers) of all client contract managers/administrators. 2. To demonstrate how the firm meets the QUALIFICATION criteria: Submit a matrix, cross referencing firm members (include name, academic credentials (e.g., MS in Architecture), professional registration, number of years of professional experience, number of years with the firm) on the vertical axis, with their proposed primary and/or alternate project position(s) for work ordered under any resulting contract. In addition, for Project Manager, identify the number of teams (engineering, survey, subcontractors/ consultants, and joint venture partners) they have managed over the past 12 months. Provide a list of all awards and performance references, from private and Government clients, received over the past seven (7) years. 3. To demonstrate how the firm meets the CAPACITY criteria: Submit an organizational chart with the following information: Principal point of contact (POC), project manager (PM), team leaders (TL), and the names of all team members and their team assignments; and, the name of at least one alternate for each key position (i.e., POC, PM, and TL). Summarize your plan for simultaneously accomplishing multiple projects within any twelve (12) month period. Provide a chart reflecting the number of hours of available capacity for each team member and key position incumbent, and the number of hours of capacity already committed under separate contract/project for the next twelve (12) months. 4. To demonstrate VOLUME OF WORK, indicate all DOD awards in the past twelve months. The revised due date for submission of interested parties SF 254/255s, is thirty (30) days from appearance of this revision announcement in the Commerce Business Daily (CBD). Note No. 24 (0077)

Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0027 19980320\C-0008.SOL)