|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF OCTOBER 2,1998 PSA#2193Engineering Field Activity, NW, NAVFACENGCOM, 19917 7th Ave NE,
Poulsbo, WA 98370-7570 C -- MODIFICATION OF SELECTION CRITERIA AND CLOSING DATE FOR
SOLICITATION FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR INDEFINTE QUANTITY
CONTRACT FOR NAVY WATERFRONT FACILITIES IN THE PUGET SOUND AREA SOL
N44255-98-D-9808 DUE 110598 POC JOAN KAIMIKAUA, Contract Specialist
(360) 396-0262 The Engineering Field Activity, NW Architect-Engineering
Services for Indefinite Quantity Contract synopsis posted in CBDNet on
September 22, 1998 is amended as follows: Replace SELECTION CRITERIA
in its entirety, with the following -- SELECTION CRITERIA: Prioritized
selection criteria in descending order of importance are: (1) Recent
specialized experience and technical competence of the firm (the
office/branch actually accomplishing the work) including
subcontractors, in the design of piers and waterfront structures and
supporting utilities and specifically Navy waterfront facilities.
Specialized waterfront experience shall include, but not be limited to
site investigations, structural analysis, utilities engineering,
waterfront engineering studies, waterfront designs, and cost analysis
completed in the past five years. Design-build experience (experience
as a member of the design-build team or the consultant preparing the
RFP) is preferred, and may result in an increased rating for this
factor. Do not list more than 10 projects in Block 8 of the SF255.
Indicate which subcontractors from the proposed team, if any,
participated in the work identified in Block 8. Address the history and
previous working relationships with the subcontractors to be utilized.
Teams that have successfully worked together on waterfront projects
are preferred, and may result in an increased rating for this factor.
(2) Professional qualifications of the staff to be assigned to this
project, including subcontractors, and their respective experience in
the study and design of piers and waterfront facilities and experience
with Navy waterfront facilities. Design-build contracting experience
and/or relevant experience producing design-build bidding documents is
preferred, and may result in an increased rating for this factor. List
only the team members who will actually perform major tasks under this
contract, and indicate which of the members will perform major tasks
under the seed project. Key personnel must have professional
registration in their discipline. In block 4 of the SF 255 (Personnel
by Discipline) show the entire proposed team by listing personnel from
subcontractors to the left of the parentheses. In Block 7 of the SF
255, indicate branch office location of each team member including the
subcontractor's personnel. (3) Past performance on recent projects.
Provide a listing of all waterfront projects for which design or RFP
preparation has been completed and bid within the last five years, and
for which construction costs total a minimum of $5,000,000. Projects
listed shall be those completed by the office/branch that will be
accomplishing the work under this contract. The listing for each
project shall include the title of the project, a description of the
project, the total design costs for the project, a comparison of the
A/E construction estimate and the project award value (include a
discussion of the circumstances of significant differences), and an
accessible owner point of contact (with phone number). The listing
shall also indicate if any projets include participation as a
design/build team member. Provide copies of performance evaluations
received within the last 3 years. (4) Design Quality Control (DQC)
Program. Provide a copy of the firm's design quality control
program/plan, including an organization chart showing each member,
identified by name and role/discipline, of the proposed design team,
including subcontractors. The organization chart shall identify the
personnel specifically designated to execute the Program. Describe the
firm's procedures for documenting/certifying the execution of the
Program, and present the coordination between each subcontractor's
quality control program and the firm's DQC Program. Include
documentation that demonstrates successful application of the quality
control program for previous projects similar to those listed above.
(5) Knowledge of the locality of the project. Demonstrate knowledge of
conditions and requirements for design and construction in the
locality. (6) Capacity and management plan to accomplish the work in
the required time limits. Discuss the impact of this workload on the
firm's permanent staff, projected workload during the contract period,
the firm's history of successfully completing work in compliance with
performance schedules, and the firm's history of providing timely
submittals. Indicate the firm's present workload and the availability
of the project team (including subcontractors) for the specific
contract period. Provide an organization chart of key personnel to be
assigned to the contract, and an organization chart of key personnel to
be assigned to the seed project. (7) Demonstrated success in
prescribing the use of recovered materials and achieving waste
reduction and energy efficiency in facility design. ***Note: Criteria
numbers (8) through (10) shall be used as secondary evaluation factors
should the application of criteria numbers (1) through (7) result in
firms being ranked as equals.*** (8) Location of the firm in the
general geographic area, provided that the application of this
criterion leaves an appropriate number of firms given the nature and
size of this project. (9) Use of small or small disadvantaged or
women-owned business firms as prime contractor or as subcontractors.
(10) Volume of work previously awarded by the DoD to the firm. This
information shall be recorded in Block 9 of the SF 255 by listing the
total amount of prime DoD fees awarded for the previous 12 months. The
closing date is extended. Qualified firms desiring consideration shall
submit one copy of an SF-254, and SF-255 and each subconsultant's
current SF-254 to Joan Kaimikaua, Engineering Field Activity,
Northwest, Code T2JK1, 19917 7th Avenue NE, Poulsbo, WA 98370 not later
than close of business (4:00 p.m. local time) on the due date stated at
the beginning of this synopsis. Posted 09/30/98 (W-SN256584). (0273) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0009 19981002\C-0003.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|