|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JANUARY 25,1999 PSA#2268Commanding Officer, Engineering Field Activity West, 900 Commodore Dr,
San Bruno, CA 94066-5006 C -- ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR FY-2001 MCON PROJECT
P-304, AIRCRAFT READY FUEL STORAGE, AT NAVAL AIR STATION FALLON, NV SOL
N62474-99-C-6032 POC Violeta T. Limcolioc, Code 1025.2 (650)244-2948,
Contracting Officer, Teresa Marshall, (650)244-2673 This synopsis
covers one contract as described below. Work includes project
development, preparation of plans, specifications and construction cost
estimates for an Aircraft Ready Fuel Storage and related facilities.
Studies, Parametric Estimating and Programming (PEP), collateral
equipment list, permit application preparation, Post Construction Award
Services (shop drawing review, as-built drawing preparation), field
consultation during construction, and preparation of Operation and
Maintenance Support Information (OMSI) may be required. Contract Award
is contingent on availability of funds. The project consists of the
design of new facilities to include a 7,950-Kiloliter (KL) steel above
ground fuel storage tank on a mat foundation over stone columns, and
removal of three non-conforming underground storage tanks. The design
will include a concrete containment area consisting of concrete
retaining walls surrounding the new tank and joining the containment
areas of tans 255 and 355, seismic ties to base of tank, pumps,
automatic shut-off valves with telemetry and fire protection. OMSI and
environmental compliance are included in the project. The project
scope and cost are subject to adjustment. Construction cost range is
between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. It is estimated that this contract
will be awarded in May 1999. This is a firm fixed price contract.
Selection will be based on the following criteria which are numbered in
order of importance: (1) EXPERIENCE: Specialized experience (both
government and private) and technical competence of the firm and/or the
proposed consultants in the planning and design of similar projects to
Navy design criteria within cost controls. Comparable experience of
the firm and sub consultants completed within the last five years will
be given the greatest weight. (2) QUALIFICATIONS: Professional
qualifications of the staff (in-house and/or consultants), specifically
on related projects addressed in criteria element (1) above. Particular
focus will be on the qualificationsof the project manager and design
professionals with expertise in the development of aircraft fuel
storage facilities. (3) PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance within the
last three years (with emphasis on similar efforts cited in criteria
elements one and two) with government agencies and/or private industry.
History of working relationship with sub consultants. (4). QUALITY
CONTROL: Provide (a) the process for cost control and the key person
responsible, (b) the process for compliance with quality control and
the key person responsible, (c) the process for compliance with the
performance schedule and the key person responsible, i.e. description
of how work will be accomplished in the required time, including the
composition of the team and availability of staff. (5) CAPACITY:
Ability of the firm to accomplish the contemplated work within a
minimum reasonable time limit as demonstrated by the impact of this
work load on the firm's permanent staff, projected work load during the
anticipated design service period, and the firm's history of
successfully completing projects in compliance with performance
schedules. Specific experience and related time frames for
accomplishment of similar efforts. (6) LOCATION: (a) Knowledge of
probable site conditions, materials and supplies availability and
applicable regulatory requirements; and (b) ability of the firm to
ensure timely response to requests for on-site support. (7)
SUBCONTRACTING: Provide the following data: identification of any team
consultants which are Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged
Business (SDB), or Women-Owned Small Business (WSB), and a description
of the work to be accomplished under the contract by these firms;
identification of the PERCENTAGE goal of planned work that will be
subcontracted to SB, SDB, WSB under the contract; identification of the
TYPE OF WORK planned to be subcontracted to SB, SDB, WSB; and if a
large business, a brief description of your SB, SDB, WSB subcontracting
outreach plan. If a large business firm is selected for award of the
contract, the same data must be included in its SB, SDB, WSB
Subcontracting Plan submitted in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFARS,
which will become an enforceable part of the contract. (8) VOLUME OF
WORK: Volume of work previously awarded by the Department of Defense
(DOD) for the past 12 months to the firm (DO NOT PROVIDE THIS
INFORMATION SINCE THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE DATA), with the objective of
effecting distribution of work among qualified Architect-Engineer
firms, including SB and SDBs firms and firms that have not had prior
DOD contracts. Those firms, which meet the requirements described in
this announcement and wish to be considered, must submit a SF 255. In
order to expedite your firm's consideration regarding the above
criteria by the board, the following application data from the SF255
Blocks 7, 8, and 10 may be presented as follows: (Block 7) Provide a
matrix for the design team. Individual rows should be labeled with the
team member's names and their proposed team assignments. Columns
shouldbe labeled as follows: firm name and office location; percent of
time to be spent on this team; professional registration; number of
years of professional experience; number of years with current firm;
highest education level and area of specialization (example: BS,
Mechanical engineering). ( Block 8) In matrix form, identify which team
members worked on the described projects. Individual rows should be
labeled with the project's titles. Columns should be labeled with the
team members' names. (Block 10) Include a tabular listing of all
excellent performance ratings and letters of commendation from both
private and DOD clients (Designate your role: prime, subcontractor or
joint venture partner). These ratings should be dated 1996 or later and
should include those for joint venture partners and subcontractors.
Provide a list of projects to be used for evaluation of criteria (1)
that started construction since 1994 and include the following data:
client's contact and current telephone number, design completion date,
construction completion date. Provide a list of projects with
construction value over $500,000, managed by the proposed project
managers), that started construction since 1994 and include the
following data: client's contact and current telephone number, client's
need date, design completion date, percent differentials between
contract award amount and estimated construction cost (note whether bid
or negotiated). Summarize your plan for starting concept studies
completing contract documents within 180 calendar days. Provide a chart
(in number of hours) comparing design team's available capacity with
their actual commitments for the next 12 months. Provide a list of
recent projects performed by the firm or joint venture partners and
appropriate subcontractors in contract area. At the selection
interview, A-E firms slated for interviews must submit a Work Plan,
based on previous experience, showing the most expeditious, but
realistic schedule for accomplishing the proposed work, their Design
Quality Assurance Plan (DQAP), including an explanation of the
management approach, an organizational chart showing inter-relationship
of management and design team components, specific quality control
process, a portfolio of design work, a listing of present business
commitments and their required completion schedules, and performance
references other than Engineering Field Activity West, Naval Facilities
Engineering Command ( include 3 or more with names and telephone
numbers of the contract administrators). For consideration, provide one
submittal package, including one original SF 255 for the entire team
and one original SF 254 for each firm proposed. The SF255 with
attachments shall be limited to no more than 25 pages and not smaller
than 10-point font. Every page that is not a SF 254 will be included in
the page count. The submittal must be received in this office (Building
205, first floor, ATTN: Violeta T. Limcolioc) no later than 3:00 PM
local time, 26 Feb 1999 at San Bruno, CA . Submittals received after
this date and time will not be considered. Include telefax numbers in
Block 3a and DUNS number, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code
if known, A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) Code if
known, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) in Block 3. Label lower
right corner of outside mailing envelope with "A-E Services
N62474-99-C-6032". Site visits will not be arranged during the
advertisement period. This is not a request for proposal (RFP) ****
Posted 01/21/99 (W-SN290108). (0021) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0017 19990125\C-0001.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|