|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 15,1999 PSA#2302GSA, FTS, 819 Taylor St. (7ZRE), Fort Worth, TX 76102-6105 D -- TIVOLI EMS INSTALLATION AND INTEGRATION, FORT SAM HOUSTON, TEXAS
SOL 7TF-99-0013 DUE 031599 POC Dorothy M. "Shan" Clark, 817-978-3984
E-MAIL: Dorothy M. "Shan" Clark, Contracting Officer,
shan.clark@gsa.gov. The following information represents a second set
of questions and answers regarding the Tivoli EMS Installation and
Integration at Fort Sam Houston, Texas. Proposals are due no later than
4:30 P.M., Central Standard Time, March 15, 1999. FAR clauses may be
found at http://farsite.hill.af.mil. 1. The introduction states that
the procurement "is a full and open procurement under SIC 7373." Is
this procurement limited to small businesses with a SIC of 7373? No. 2.
In the introduction, subparagraph e. asks the bidder to state whether
our proposal is level of effort or fixed price. In paragraph 5.1.iii
the type of contract is listed as Fixed-price. Please specify whether
level of effort bids will be accepted. Firm Fixed Price 3. Para 1.2 Is
it expected that all of the existing servers will be replaced with new
servers? Who is responsible for the disposal of the existing servers?
Not all servers will be replaced. The Government will dispose of any
servers that are not used in a trade-in program. 4. Para1.2 lists 100
distributed servers while para. 2.2.2 requires that the contractor have
the capability to remotely manage 75 servers. Is this the number of
consolidated servers envisioned? There are approximately 50 servers
that are not included in the consolidation effort. 5. Para 2.2.1 calls
out 4500 desktops and 1000 networked printers and the system needs to
be capable of supporting 7000 desktops. Para 2.2.3 calls for a
capability to manage up to 4000 network equipment nodes. What are the
correct numbers? There are currently 4500 clients, approximately 1000
networked printers and approximately 4000 SNMP addressable network
electronic nodes (hubs, routers, switches, etc.). 6. In Para 3.2 is a
list of a set of servers. This implies a design that may have been
previously done. Is that document available? If there was no design
then what is the set of servers based on? Are there Quantities
associated with the servers called out in Para 3.2.? 6. The set of
servers is based on existing equipment that needs to be replaced due to
age of the equipment and current technology, current and projected
need. Quantities recommended should be based on industry standards to
support the 4500 Ft Sam users. 7. Para. 3.2, calls for Data Servers,
application servers, internet server, intranet server, and a Primary
Domain Controller. What about EMAIL? Quite often this is a separate
server. Additionally what is the EMAIL traffic load? Additionally, as
we consolidate to the TWO computer rooms that they will provide there
will be a requirement for a Power Hub or similar devices to provide
connectivity to the outlying hubs at the different buildings. Will we
be responsible to provide these devices and will we be responsible to
provide the Fiber or Copper connectivity from the computer rooms to the
outlying hubs? If so, how many buildings and outlying hubs are there?
This will drive the size of the Power The E-Mail servers have been
provided and installed by a higher headquarters project and are not a
part of this effort. The consolidation effort is based on removing the
existing servers that are placed in buildings throughout Fort Sam
Houston and consolidating them into the two identified computer rooms.
There is existing power and network connectivity that will be used. 8.
Para 4.1.1 calls for the contractor to provide a return on investment
estimate. When is this estimate required? Not later than 10 working
days after completion of the pilot. 9. Para 4.3 Quality control. The
ITBC shall provide final Quality control. What will the standard be?
The standard will be that the system and all work associated with it
meets or exceeds the requirements as stated in the statement of work.
10. Purchase vs lease of Tivoli software? Either is satisfactory. 11.
Vendor purchase vs. Government purchase of software? GSA is GSA. Vendor
should be able to get GSA price or better. 12. Amount of money for
project? Not open for discussion. 13. ATM Network -- What are the odds
of getting funding? Good chance. It is being designed by Lucent
Technologies, through Army CUITN contract. Engineering will be complete
next month and ITBC will request funding at that time. Major impact on
this project would be replacement of current Ungermann Bass hubs with
manageable ATM hubs. 14. When is ATM to be completed? In 2 phases.
Phase 1 will be core nodes -- replace core devices we already have
(Ungermann Bass hubs), with ATM switches. Core nodes are co-located at
the telephone switch nodes, main switch (core #1), switch node 2, and
switch node 5, and switch node 3 (Camp Bullis). Phase 2 will be
replacement of the edge devices with ATM switches. Cannot afford
complete face lift all at once. 15. Who is switcher manufacturer? We
don't know at this time 16. Previously stated that there are currently
7 different PDCs. Will vendor or government merge these into a single
domain? Collapsing the existing domains is already in process. There
will be one domain on Ft Sam Houston. Greenway Park servers are not
managed by the ITBC, but the Greenway user PCs are. The AMEDD NT domain
structure, as it applies to Ft Sam Houston is : 17. All users have
accounts in the CEN domain. Ft Sam exchange Servers are in the US
domain, which is headquartered out of Greenway Park under US Army
Medical Information Systems Support Agency. All
application/data/printer servers supporting the Fort Sam users are in
a resource domain (AMEDDCS) that is located at Ft Sam Houston. There is
a two way trust between the CEN and US domains, and the AMEDDCS domain
trusts the CEN domain. This design was developed and is being
implemented on a worldwide, Army Medical corporate level. Exchange
serves support Fort Sam Houston users are physically located at Ft Sam
as well as several CEN BDCs. 18. What is policy for amount of space
allowed for user space? 50 meg, per user on Exchange and for home
directories, plus directorate level share space (300mg) 19. On the
application servers, the 30GB at RAID 5, was it usable disk space or
total disk space? It is total. The applications being served are
Delrina (JetForm) FormFlow, PERSACT (Oracle runtime forms), 3270
emulation software, MS Office 97/ 95, and specialized unique
application software 20. In the 2 locations, what is the backup policy?
Ability to back up open files. ITBC considered a DLT 7000 series backup
solution. Backup widow of opportunity is 8 hours. Backup will be done
across the network -- possibly with a backup server at each location.
21. Will scope will include Greenway plaza, not USAMISSA? No -- only
responsible for the desktop and users. 22. On the servers, what size of
drives are required for the mirrored Operating system partition? 2GB.
23. Will everything be managed from one location? We are trying to
centralize in one location -- Bldg 4190. The computer room in 2840 has
limited office space. The servers will be placed in the 2840 machine
(computer) room. 24. 100 different servers, looking at 75 managed
servers, internet, intranet, application, and data servers. What are
the true numbers? We currently have 35 servers at various locations
supporting users' directories, providing group data directories,. There
are 74 servers supporting applications, 30 NT servers with unique
applications, some specialized, locally developed, some top driven;
which we cannot touch in the consolidation. With the UNIX servers,
there is approximately 50-60 servers that cannot be consolidated. There
is a total of 130 servers over all as of 1 March. The consolidation can
touch 80 servers to replace or consolidate. Servers are being added
through top driven (DoD level projects). 25. Will applications that
have been top driven be put on consolidated servers? Top driven
applications/servers cannot be touched except for monitoring. 26.
Servers that are top driven, will they be Tivoli managed? Yes, as much
as possible. 27. Elaborate on Internet and Intranet servers. We have
a need for an Intranet server for internal information. The internet
server is already in existence, URL is www.fshtx.amry.mil. 28. How many
web pages do you estimate to be in intranet and external web servers?
Internal web hasn't been completely developed, external web is 30-40
pages and is increasing daily. 29. Estimated number of hits? 10,000 a
week. Estimate an internal site would probably be more. 30. How many
network devices are manageable? Ungermann-Bass hubs are not, the Net
Director software that manages them can be fed into SNMP management
software. Not looking at replacing any hardware with this project. 31.
Question 14, set for new cable, it this correct? Have latest version,
not hpop. 32. Is this going to be a best solution or best cost
selection? Best value selection. 33. Will there be a Makeup day, and if
so, will that push the proposal due date back? Make up day will be
Friday, 12 March. Due date is still the 15th. 34. Award date up to 30
days after due date? Won't take that long, depends on how clean the
proposals are. 35. May the proposals be submitted electronically?
Prefer electronic submited to Dorothy Clark. 36. If submitted
electronically, do you want a hard copy? Doesn't have to be. Please
make the attachment MS Office 97/95. 37. Can we send it in binder form?
That's ok in MS Office 97. Get it to the Contracting Officer. 38. What
is the number of manageable hubs/switches? Don't have a good number.
The current SNMP counted interfaces that it is looking at,
approximately 4000 interfaces, connected to FDDI, project does not
include BAMC 39. Project completion, different phases, target of 30 Nov
99, how solid is this? Project to be completed. 40. Going to a diskless
user environment, or are applications on the user hard drive or do they
go to server? ITBC hasn't successfully tested the diskless environment,
there are too many unique applications. Currently for 90%+ of the
users, the applications are stored on the hard drive. 41. Please
clarify. The applications referred to earlier are server based ONLY
applications. The other applications (Office, etc.) can be accessed on
a server, but the default is to load and run from the local hard
drive. Currently the applications are fielded both ways, will have to
continue both ways, cannot replace all the user PCs during this
project. 42. Current baseline for desktops systems, is loading ofc 97
etc on the user's local hard drive? The load on the users local hard
drive depends on how old system is. The current policy is to load the
software on the local hard drive. Previous loads were based on the
available drive space available on the system. 43. Is user allowed to
affect the configuration of their desktop system? Depends on what
operating system they are currently running. NT Workstation systems
cannot be reconfigured by the user. 44. Software distribution? Current
baseline for desktops is NT Workstation. ITBC expects that policies
will be required and will ensure support for the enforcement.
Deployment of software across the network to a group of users will
require an enforced baseline and policies. Majority of desktop are NT
-- 80%, some desktops may have Win95. DOS may be used at non networked
locations. 45. Ball park number of Win 95 and Unix desktops? Unix --
in 2 locations, approximately 15 -- 20 users. 46. Number of Cisco
routers? We have model 2500 series to 7500 series, don't know exact
numbers at this time. 47. IBM mainframe will be shut down 1 Oct 99. The
Defense Messaging Service is a top driven, monitored, group of servers.
Most top driven systems are supported by backups -- put tapes in when
requested, follow directions as requested, normally managed in distance
location, some use Tivoli at the distant end, some don't. 48. Does ITBC
have HP hardware to run Tivoli? No, current hardware is located in
another bldg. Doesn't have the horsepower to run the Tivoli. 49. Do we
have an internal help desk? We utilize Bendata Heat to respond to work
orders. Tech is issued hard copy of work order, they go out to the
customer location, fix the problem, close the work order and then go on
to the next one. 50. What kind of calls are received? Anything and
everything -- Hardware/software problems, loads, purchase.51. Number of
Help Desk Staff? 7 people manning the phones. 52. Domain
controllers/application servers, will they be used as print servers?
Yes they are currently being used as print servers. We have 1000
connected printers. User population was at 3500 users, about 8 months
ago. Since then we have connected another 3 Buildings. We are getting
ready to connect a major distance learning that is about 500 computers.
This is the first phase of the distance learning implementation. When
the current plans have been completed, we will have 4500 users, with a
planned increase to 7000 users that we will need to support. 53. Help
desk -- migrating to Remedy. The software is loaded and sitting ready
for us to use. It is on an HP 9000/755, Oracle is loaded. Remedy there
but not being used. 54. Does the currently Help Desk or management
program use a page package? No 55. Is there any wireless network? No,
we are considering wireless at Camp Bullis, but not currently
implemented. 56. Units at Camp Stanley? There is approximately 20
users, and currently 1 server. Camp Bullis has 50-100 users that are
permanent. Camp Bullis has E1 link. 57. Slowest WAN link we have is the
T1to Greenway. The EMS cannot be done over the internet. Due to the
distance learning that is supported at Ft Sam, the internet connection
gets bogged down, average is 70% utilization. 58. 10MG pipe, does it
go to Kelly AFB? Yes. No other changes. Posted 03/11/99 (W-SN307501).
(0070) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0029 19990315\D-0008.SOL)
D - Automatic Data Processing and Telecommunication Services Index Page
|
|