|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 19,1999 PSA#2306Department Of The Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Commander, Atlantic Division, Contracts Office, Code 02231, 1510
Gilbert Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23511-2699 C -- ARCHITECTURAL-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR FAMILY HOUSING
REVITALIZATION, CAPEHART HOUSING, MANGROVE MANOR/MANATEE BAY, U. S.
NAVAL STATION, ROOSEVELT ROADS, PUERTO RICO SOL N62470-99-R-3304 DUE
042399 POC Bayla L. Mack, 757-322-8271 E. M. (Betsy) Carmack, Contract
Specialist, 757-322-8290 E-MAIL: Architect-Engineer,
mackbl@efdlant.navfac.navy.mil. Architect-Engineer or Engineering
Services are required for preparation of plans, specifications, cost
estimates, related studies, all associated engineering services, shop
drawing review, as-built drawing preparation, Quality Assurance Plan
(QAP) preparation (provides construction contract inspection
requirements), Operation and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI),
construction inspection and engineering consultation services during
construction. The Government will reserve an option to negotiate final
plans, specifications, cost estimates, related studies, all associated
engineering services, and all post construction award services. The
anticipated design start date is June 1999 with design completion by
February 2000; construction inspection services if required start in
June 2000 and end May 2002; preparation of OMSI if required may begin
in June 2000 and be completed by May 2002. The projects involve
revitalization of existing housing units at the U. S. Naval Station,
Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico; interior and exterior repairs including
reconfiguration of interior and exterior spaces, construction of new
spaces and additions, renovations of interior living spaces including
kitchens and bathrooms, replacement of fixtures, hardware, doors and
windows, upgrade and replacement of existing electrical and mechanical
systems, site repairs and improvements, and landscaping. The projects
will be designed to separate the construction into phases. The A&E
must demonstrate his and each key consultant's qualifications with
respect to the published evaluation factors for all services.
Evaluation factors (1) through (6) are of equal importance; factors
(7), (8) and (9) are of lesser importance and will be used as
"tie-breakers" among technically equal firms. Specific evaluation
factors include: (1) Specialized Experience -- Firms will be evaluated
in terms of: (a) their past experience with regard to the design of
Military housing repair projects; and (b) knowledge of local codes,
laws, permits and construction materials and practices of the
Caribbean; (2) Professional qualifications and technical competence in
the type of work required: Firms will be evaluated in terms of the
design staff's: (a) active professional registration and ability to
provide registration compliance with Puerto Rican environmental law
either within the firm or via consultant; (b) experience (with present
and other firms) and roles of staff members specifically on projects
addressed in evaluation factor number one; (c) capability to provide
qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of
services and ability to surge to meet unexpected project demands; and
(d) organization and office management as evidenced by management
approach (management plan for this project), and personnel roles in
organization; (3) Sustainable Design -- Firms will be evaluated in
terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying
sustainability concepts and principles to facilities and infrastructure
problems through an integrated design approach; (4) Ability to perform
the work to schedules noted above -- Firms will be evaluated in terms
of impact of this workload on the design staff's projected workload
during the design period (show current and projected workload with a
plan and schedule on how you propose to accomplish the work); (5) Past
performance -- Firms will be evaluated in terms of one or more of the
following (with emphasis on projects addressed in factor number one):
(a) the process for cost control and the key person responsible; and
(b) performance ratings/letters of recommendations received; (6)
Quality Control Program -- Firms will be evaluated on the acceptability
of their internal quality control program used to ensure technical
accuracy and discipline coordination of plans and specifications --
list key personnel responsible;; (7) Firm location (provided that
application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified
firms, given the nature and size of the contract); (8) Volume of Work
-- Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the
firm by DOD with the objective of affecting an equitable distribution
of DOD A&E contracts among qualified A&E firms, including small and
small disadvantaged business firms and firms that have not had prior
DOD contracts; and (9) Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business
Subcontracting Plan -- Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which
offerors identify and commit to small business and to small
disadvantaged business, historically black college and university, or
minority institution in performance of the contract, whether as joint
venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The following are the
published SECNAV goals for small business subcontracting support: Small
Business (SB) -- 62% Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) -- 12%;
Women-owned Small Business (WOSB) -- 5%; Historically Black Colleges
and Universities/Minority Institutes (HBCU/MI) -- 5%. Large Business
Firms shall submit their Navy-wideSF 295 (Standard Form 295, Summary
Subcontract Report) the Standard Form 255. The slated firms will be
required to provide a preliminary subcontracting plan (support for
small business subcontracting) as part of the interview. The contract
requires that the selected firm have an on-line access to E-mail via
the internet for routine exchange of correspondence. Firms are required
to prepare the cost estimate utilizing the NAVFAC "SUCCESS" system in
work breakdown structure (WBS), the specifications in the SPECSINTACT
system format, and all drawings shall be submitted in an AutoCAD
compatible format. The design contract scope may require evaluation and
definition of asbestos materials and toxic waste disposition. Fee
negotiations would provide for laboratory testing and subsequent
preparation of plans and specifications may require definition of
removal and/or definition of disposal process. Firms responding to this
announcement must be prepared to accept the aforementioned as a part of
their contract responsibility. Estimated construction cost is more than
$10,000,000. Type of contract: Firm Fixed Price. -- Architect-Engineer
firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are
invited to submit completed Standard Forms (SF) 254 (unless already on
file) and 255, U. S. Government Architect-Engineer Qualifications, to
the office shown above. In Block 10 of the SF 255, discuss why the
firm is especially qualified based upon synopsized evaluation factors;
and provide evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice
the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State
registration number. For selection evaluation factor (1), provide the
following information for only the staff proposed for this work using
these column headings: "NAME", "RELATED PROJECTS WORKED ON", "YEAR",
"FIRM", and "TECHNICAL ROLE". Use Block 10 of the SF 255 to provide any
additional information desired and continue Block 10 narrative
discussion on plain bond paper. All information must be included within
the SF 255. Provide a synopsis of the scope of work, point of contact
and telephone number for each project listed in SF 255 Block 8. Firms
having a current SF 254 on file with this office and those responding
by 4:00 p.m. EST, 23 April 1999 will be considered. Late responses will
be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-10. Neither hand carried
proposals nor facsimile responses will be accepted. Firms responding to
this advertisement are requested to submit only one copy of
qualification statements. The qualification statements should clearly
indicate the office location where the work will be performed and the
qualifications of the individuals anticipated to work on the contract
and their geographical location. -- This proposed contract is being
solicited on an unrestricted basis, therefore, replies to this notice
are requested from all business concerns. -- The small business size
standard classification is SIC 8712 ($2,500,000). -- This is not a
request for proposals. Inquiries concerning this project should mention
location and contract number. See Note 24. Posted 03/17/99
(W-SN309455). (0076) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0022 19990319\C-0002.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|