|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 29,1999 PSA#2312Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt, Division of
Procurement, 200 Third Street, Room 207, Parkersburg WV 26101-5312 R -- TECHNICAL RESEARCH FOR BOOK ENTRY SYSTEMS POC Point of Contact,
Tammie S. Johnson, 304/480-6461, Contracting Officer, Orlando R.
Yaconis, 304/480-6992 WEB: Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the
Public Debt,, http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/oa/oaprocr.htm. E-MAIL:
Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt,,
procurement@bpd.treas.gov. The Bureau of the Public Debt intends to
negotiate a sole source procurement with Angelo Scalzo, 64 Shadow Lane,
Stanton Island, New York 10306, to obtain the following services: To
deliver position papers, analyses, and briefings, represent Public Debt
in meetings with government securities market participants, and train
existing book-entry staff on operational aspects of the secondary
market trading, and back-office clearing and settlement environments
related to fixed-income products such as Treasury securities. The
Contractor shall provide briefings and written reports on the following
topics: 1. Assess the Feasibility of Implementing Repo Tracking
Functionality in the National Book-Entry System (NBES) a. Describe the
repo tracking functionality that might be provided by NBES. b.
Identify modifications necessary to NBES and other secondary market
systems to provide Repo tracking functionality in NBES. c. Identify
pros and cons to Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and secondary market
participantsof providing this Repo tracking functionality to NBES
participants and other secondary market customers. d. Identify
potential users of the Repo tracking functionality. e. Analyze cost
effectiveness of this functionality -- for Treasury/Federal Reserve and
for potential users. f. Analyze and describe impact on payment systems
risk. g. Identify cost of providing repo tracking functionality in
NBES and the process that should be used to determine the changes to
the fee structure necessary to recover the cost of providing this
service. 2. Assess the Feasibility of Providing Securities Transfer
Netting in the NBES System a. Describe the securities transfer netting
functionality that might be provided in NBES. b. Identify
modifications necessary to NBES and other secondary market systems to
provide Securities Transfer Netting and Settlement in NBES. c. Analyze
pros and cons to Treasury, the Federal Reserve System and the
secondary market of providing this functionality to NBES participants
and other secondary market customers. d. Identify potential users of
this securities transfer and netting functionality. e. Analyze cost
effectiveness of this functionality -- for Treasury/Federal Reserve and
for potential users. f. Analyze impact on payment system risk. g.
Identify cost of providing securities transfer netting in NBES and the
process that should be used to determine the changes to the fee
structure necessary to recover the cost of providing this service. 3.
Assess Feasibility of Modifying $50 Million "Cap" on Security Transfer
Wires a. Document original purposes of "cap" and an analysis of
whether purpose was achieved. b. Analyze pros and cons to Treasury, the
Federal Reserve System and the secondary market of: 1) Eliminating the
transfer "cap". 2) Increasing the "cap" to various levels. c. Identify
potential benefactors for each type of change to this feature. d.
Analyze cost effectiveness of this feature -- for Treasury/Federal
Reserve and for users. e. Analyze the impact on payment system risk. f.
Estimate costs to implement for Treasury/Federal Reserve and users. g.
Estimate how the volume of transfers may be affected with a change to
the "cap." 4. Identify What Treasury/FRBs Could do to Facilitate the
Concept of Straight-Through Processing for Securities Transactions a.
Identify policy, operational and systemic changes that the FRB/Treasury
could implement that would facilitate the move toward straight-through
processing of securities transactions for securities held on NBES. b.
Analyze the pros and cons to Treasury and the Federal Reserve of
promoting straight-through processing. c. Estimate and analyze
implementation costs, if any, for Treasury/Federal Reserve and NBES
participants. d. Propose an implementation strategy. e. Analyze impact
on payment system risk. 5. Identify other Initiatives or Modifications
the Treasury/FRB could take or make that would Improve or Facilitate
both Primary and Secondary Market Activity in Treasury Securities. a.
Identify other initiatives or modifications the Treasury/FRB could take
or make that would improve or facilitate both Primary and Secondary
Market Activity in Treasury Securities. b. Analyze the pros and cons
for these initiatives or modifications c. Estimate and analyze
implementation costs, if any, for these initiatives or modifications.
d. Propose an implementation strategy. e. Analyze impact of these
initiatives or modifications. All work shall be performed within a
twelve-month period. The Contractor shall have at least 20 or more
years of experience in brokerage operations and be an expert in the
design, development, and operation of broker/dealer back-office
operations, and have a highly successful record of achievements in both
project and line management functions. The Contractor shall have
experience of managing a staff of at least 70-100 operations personnel
with an annual budget of at least $4-10 million with a daily
settlement activity value of at least $25-30 billion. The Contractor
shall have experience in developing brokerage back office systems that
comply with the Government Securities Act of 1986. Also, the
Contractor shall have experience in designing and developing back
office clearance and settlement systems for major U.S. dealer or
secondary market firms. The Contractor shall have experience as an
operations consultant to one or more large primary dealer operations.
The Contractor shall have experience in managing daily settlements and
implementing remote (self) clearance with agent banks on all
book-entry securities. The contractor shall have performed the full
range of activities in book-entry back-office operations. The
Contractor shall be intimately familiar with all Treasury securities
products. The Contractor must have a conceptual understanding of the
National Book-Entry System (NBES). Also, the Contractor must have an
expert knowledge of: (1) clearing bank operations; (2) private netting
and clearing corporations (e.g., the Government Securities Clearing
Corporation); and (3) broker/dealer back-office operations. Finally,
the Contractor must understand and be able to offer expert advice to
Treasury so that it may properly conduct its responsibilities under the
CBE Program. All affirmative responses must be in writing, must be
accompanied by clear and convincing evidence to show that the respondee
has the experience described above and the ability to provide the
services required. No solicitation document is available. A request for
documentation will not be considered an affirmative response. If no
affirmation written response is received, within 15 days after
publication of this notice, to the effect that comparable services are
available, and that it is more advantageous to the Government than
obtaining these services through a sole-source contract with Angelo
Scalzo, a sole-source acquisition award will be negotiated. Telephonic
inquiries will not be accepted. Posted 03/25/99 (W-SN312700). (0084) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0071 19990329\R-0009.SOL)
R - Professional, Administrative and Management Support Services Index Page
|
|