|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF APRIL 19,1999 PSA#2327Commander, Marine Corps System Command, Code CTQ, 2033 Barnett Avenue,
Ste 315, Quantico, VA 22134-5010 A -- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR NON-LETHAL TECHNOLOGIES SOL
BAA-99-R-1045 DUE 060499 POC Dwight B. Micheal, Sr., Contracting
Specialist, (703) 784-3367 E-MAIL: Click here to contact the Contract
Specialist via, michealdb@quantico.usmc.mil. Broad Agency Announcement
for Non-Lethal Technologies The Marine Corps Systems Command,
supporting the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, is interested in
industry submission of new non-lethal technology ideas, which may
include the assimilation of new and/or existing technologies. The
requirement is for one- to two-year concept demonstration projects that
will be funded up to the $700K level. These projects will have very
specific deliverables such as a proof-of-principle demonstration,
delivery of a prototype, or a feasibility report. All proposals
selected for funding will be required to submit monthly status reports
to include financial data as well as a comprehensive report to be
delivered at the end of the project. At the conclusion of each project,
an evaluation will be made as to whether or not to pursue this
technology further. The goal of this solicitation will be to explore
new non-lethal capabilities in application of measured, selectable
force that will reduce risks in both noncombatantand combatant
casualties, friend and foe, and minimize collateral damage to equipment
and structures. Consideration will be given only to proposals that
address one or both of the following operational capabilities: 1. Clear
Facilities of Personnel -- The desired capability will facilitate
military operations on urbanized terrain (MOUT) by reducing risk to
noncombatants and minimizing casualties and collateral damage. By
clearing facilities of personnel through integration of non-lethal
capabilities, friendly forces should be afforded an enhanced ability to
deny facilities (military advantage) to an enemy attempting to occupy
and hold built-up areas. The proposed solutions should be capable of
either: 1) causing individuals to evacuate the targeted facility of
there own accord, or 2) incapacitating the inhabitants of the building
for a duration not shorter than 10 minutes thereby allowing forces to
manually clear the facility without risk. For purposes of this BAA,
incapacitation is defined as either physical inability (real or
perceived) or mental disinclination to resist or pose a threat to
friendly forces. The desired capability should include an effective
engagement range to target personnel of not less than 500 meters. The
weapon should be able to produce repeatable effects, be able to engage
multiple targets, be used selectively against portions of
buildings/structures and not leave detrimental or harmful residuals
after use. And must be safe for the soldier to operate in relation to
physiological functions, such as sight and hearing. 1.
Disable/Neutralize Vehicles, Aircraft, Vessels, and Facilities -- This
capability encompasses a wide range of desired effects and
subcategories based on the variety of equipment types and systems to be
targeted. A non-lethal effect that neutralizes or disables vehicles,
aircraft (on the ground), vessels and/or facilities can render these
systems inoperable; however, physical destruction of the target is not
a primary goal. The use of these systems should not cause permanent
injury or death to personnel in or on the target, or in the vicinity of
the target. The desired effects should include an engagement range and
tracking time to target vehicles, aircraft, vessels and/or facilities
of not less than 1,000 meters for period of at least 60 seconds and
produce repeatable effects to engage multiple targets, must possess an
inherent ability to significantly disable or neutralize these systems
or facilities and render them inoperable beyond expedient repair
capability of the operators, or uninhabitable for a period not less
than one hour. Size and configuration of the target vehicles, aircraft,
vessels and/or facilities should not be a factor in the ability of the
proposed system to produce desired effects on the target. Targeted
material or facilities can be damaged below the catastrophic threshold,
but must not leave detrimental or harmful residuals after use. Desired
qualities for any non-lethal system proposed to address the above
operational capabilities are: 1. Augment Lethal Force -- The non-lethal
system(s) will not degrade or reduce the soldier's ability to use
lethal force when necessary. 2. Expeditionary -- The system should be
easily transportable within the framework of existing logistics
systems, survive the rigors of intensive military operations, and be
easy to maintain and operate. The system should minimize the demand for
additional hardware and equipment, additional individual carrying
requirements and for additional specialized training requirements. 3.
Reversible Effects -- Counter-personnel non-lethal systems are required
to have reversible effects (permanent/severe injuries are
unacceptable). The desire is for the weapon effects to become inert
and/or have no residual human effects with the simple passage of time.
4. Any weapon produced must be safe for the soldier to operate.
Excessive safety equipment beyond traditional hearing and/or sight
protection is not acceptable. Proposals will be considered within the
scope of the guidance provided above. Respondents shall submit a "white
paper" summarizing the proposed effort along with a cost estimate. The
white paper shall be one to five pages in length inclusive of
drawings, pictures, etc., be submitted on 8.5 by 11 paper at 12 pitch
or greater font size. The white paper must address the following
topics: 1. Description of proposed concept to include how it will be
used to facilitate one or more of the capabilities listed above, 2.
Background information (technical, historical, applicability, etc.), 3.
Description of work to be done under this effort (to include technical
detail), 4. Discussion of associated risk areas, 5. Description of the
deliverables required under the scope of this effort, and 6. Cost
estimates for materials and labor. The presentation/concept papers may
be supported by drawings and/or initial experimentation results/test
data, within the five-page limit. Working presentation/concept papers
shall be submitted in original form with three copies, only to the
following address: DIRECTOR, JOINT NON-LETHAL DIRECTORATE, 3097 RANGE
ROAD, QUANTICO, VA 22134, REF: BAA-99-R-1045. Offerors will be
requested to submit in-depth proposals should the Joint Non-Lethal
Directorate deem the proposed working presentation/concept papers of
significant scientific and technical merit as well as suitable military
utility. In-depth proposals shall be divided into three sections: 1.
Technical section which will clearly state and define the objectives,
technical approach and methodology, supporting technical
data/information noting the proprietary aspects of the effort, and
delineated plan of execution to include milestones; 2. A management
section which will identify key expertise, experience, facilities,
resumes of key personnel; and 3. A cost section providing detailed
work/cost breakdowns of the proposed effort, (materials and labor).
Options and assumptions shall be clearly identified, defined and
discussed in detail. The proposal evaluation effort and final award
decisions will be based equally upon the technical approach and best
value that can be achieved within the funds available. Key evaluation
considerations are: 1. Applicability to BAA -- Does the proposed idea
address one or more of the desired capabilities identified in the BAA?
2. Clear Objectives and Deliverables -- How well defined are the
proposal objectives? Is there a clear systematic program plan which
leads to clearly defined deliverables? 3. Advancing State of the Art --
Has this idea been effectively demonstrated before? How successful were
prior attempts to implement the proposed idea, and if there was a
technical problem does the proposal, address the problem and present an
innovative solution? 4. Ability to Achieve Proposed Technical
Objectives -- This criterion addresses the technical feasibility of the
proposed idea. In other words, how likely is it that the stated
technical objectives can actually be met? 5. Offeror's Expertise in the
Technology Area -- How long has the offeror been working in this
technology area? Does the offeror have the appropriate technical
background to successfully meet the objectives? 6. Ability to Meet
Schedule -- How likely is it that the developer can accomplish the
technical objectives within the proposed time frame? 7. Reasonable Cost
-- Does the cost seem appropriate for the proposed idea? 8.
Logistically Supportable -- How logistically supportable is the
proposed concept? Would it be repairable in the field? How is it
powered (does it use gas, diesel, batteries, solar power)? Will it be
hand-held or platform mounted? How would it be transported? 9.
Acceptable Risk to User and/or Environment -- For counter-personnel
NLWs, is the user of the system at risk to its effects? For
counter-material NLWs, are there potential risks to the human users?
Does the proposed system present a hazard to the environment? 10.
Countermeasure Offset Risk -- Can the proposed system weapons effect on
the target set be easily countered? 11. Reversible Effects Risk (for
Counter-Personnel Only) -- The desired mechanism for reversible effects
is simply the passage of time (anywhere from minutes to hours) for full
recovery. How likely is the proposed weapon to have reversible effects
on humans? 12. Risk to Personnel (for Counter-Material Only). There is
no requirement for anti-material weapons to have reversible effects,
however the anti-material weapon should not cause irreversible effects
to personnel in or around the intended target. How likely is the
weapon to have adverse impact on personnel in or around the intended
target? White papers will be received until June 4, 1999. Evaluations
will follow receipt of white papers, and solicitation for in-depth
proposals from selected white papers will occur by July 16, 1999. The
in-depth proposals will be due by August 13, 1999, and selection will
be made by September 30, 1999. Negotiations and awards are anticipated
by Jan 1, 2000. This BAA is not an authorization to incur cost in
anticipation of a resultant contract. Information provided herein is
subject to amendment and in no way binds the Government to the award of
a contract. Technical questions must be addressed in writing to Mr.
John Busic, (703) 784-2997 x232, Fax (703) 784-3178, E-mail
busicj@quantico-usmc.mil, Address Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate,
3097 Range Road, Quantico, VA 22134. Contractual questions may be
addressed to Mr. Dwight Micheal, Sr., (703) 784-3367. CITE:
________________ Posted 04/15/99 (W-SN320964). (0105) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0008 19990419\A-0008.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|