|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF NOVEMBER 22,1999 PSA#2480USTDA, 1621 N. Kent Street, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22209-2131 B -- BEIRUT SUBURBAN MASS TRANSIT CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY DUE
123199 POC Evangela Kunene, USTDA, 1621 N. Kent Street, Suite 200,
Arlington, VA 22209-2131, Tel: (703) 875-4357, Fax: (703) 875-4009 The
Grantee invites submission of qualifications and proposal data
(collectively referred to as the "Proposal") from interested U.S. firms
which are qualified on the basis of experience and capability to
develop a feasibility study for this project. In the period since the
Lebanese civil war ended, new residential and commercial construction
is growing. Despite the government of Lebanon's (GOL) extensive
rehabilitation of the country's road network, this expansion has put
additional pressure on the utility of the existing roads. Beirut's road
system, in particular, has outgrown its capacity, most notably in
sections of the city where residents have never had convenient access
to rail transit. Before the war, the existing rail system was equipped
to handle the overflows, but the increase in the total numbers of rail
and road commuters has caused difficulties and delays in that system as
well. It is estimated that the 1994 population of the Beirut
Metropolitan Area was 1,165,000 and that it will rise to 1,950,000 by
2015. The job base in Beirut is estimated to rise from 470,000 jobs
(1994) to 780,000 jobs (2015). According to two separate studies, rail
ridership is projected to be between 5,000 and 10,000 peak-hour
passenger trips per hour on the key suburban/regional corridors in and
around the Beirut Metropolitan area by 2015. To address this growing
transportation problem, the GOL has commissioned several mass transit
studies. In 1994, the Ministry of Transportation hired Sofrerail
(France) to undertake a feasibility study on the redesign and expansion
of the coastal railway system. The study was completed, but was lacking
in several aspects. Next, a European consortium recommended a Mass
Rapid Transit system that uses cars similar to those of the Washington
Metro system except for the provision of an overhead pantograph system
operating at 1,500 Volts DC. The cost of this double-track,
electrified, heavy-rail option is extremely expensive. This consortium,
which attempted to reach an agreement with GOL via direct negotiations,
was also demanding a monopoly with exclusive access to the right-of-way
through a land transfer. However, a completely new government came into
power in December 1998. This government rejects agreements by mutual
negotiations in favor of conducting completely transparent and
competitive worldwide bids. Furthermore, the new GOL is eager to move
ahead with select infrastructure projects that have been delayed by
past administrations. The Council of Ministers has determined that the
Beirut suburban mass-transit corridor project is one of the priorities
in the transportation sector. The project will provide an alternative
commute to the automobile using the pre-war rail alignment. Although
the line is not currently in operation, the old system's tracks still
exist along with some dormant and rusting rolling stock. (Based on a
GOL July 1999 site survey, none of the fixed assets and rolling stock
is salvageable.) Because these tracks would provide an ideal
Right-of-Way to build the new mass transit line along the former
corridor, the proposed feasibility study will look at using this
alignment and building a completely new transit corridor on it. In
order to enhance the revenue base for this project, the valuable land
along the alignment and its air rights will be considered for joint
commercial and residential development. The project will probably be
constructed using the newest, 3rd-rail technology (available through
U.S. and foreign competitors), and the railway system is likely to be
privatized in the process. The feasibility study will examine the
following topics: 1) Assess existing demand studies and determine
demand for restoration of mass transit in and around Beirut along with
the potential for either shared or parallel freight operations along
the Corridor; 2) Determine tariff levels to establish the fare box
recovery ratio and pay back the equity portion of constructions loans
to the extent the market will bear; 3) Develop an optimal set of
public-private financing and operating options based on the commercial
feasibility of the project; 4) Conduct conceptual engineering for the
project with consideration given to American supplied equipment for
track, vehicles, communications and signaling; 5) Conduct an
environmental impact assessment which identifies construction and
ongoing environmental risks associated with the project given an
expected net reduction in noise, pollution and congestion resulting
from this project; 6) Generate a functional performance specification
which allows enough flexibility during implementation to draw from the
experience of worldwide design-build-own-maintain (DBOM) projects
elsewhere while prescribing 30% technical standards for system design,
engineering, operation and maintenance; and 7) Develop a tender
package designed to comply with the GOL needs that attracts maximum
interest from the international investment community. The objective of
this study is to produce a value-engineered, optimized, achievable
mass transit plan enabling the GOL to negotiate abeneficial partnership
with the private sector in order to expedite system construction. The
selected consultant shall prepare a tender package for a mass transit
corridor. The U.S. firm selected will be paid in U.S. dollars from a
$625,000 grant to the Grantee from the U.S. Trade and Development
Agency (TDA). The fact that this company may design the specs for the
project's components means that it cannot bid against these specs. The
selected Study contractor may later serve as a consultant to MOT or to
the winning bidder (during the implementation phase of the project),
but may NOT bid on the tender that is written through this TDA-funded
activity. However, once the winning bidder wins the bid for all or some
of the project's components and the project moves to the implementation
phase, then the selected Study contractor may serve as consultant to
the winning bidder or to the Ministry of Transport. A detailed Request
for Proposals (RFP), which includes requirements for the Proposal, the
Terms of Reference,and a background definitional mission/desk study
report are available from TDA, at 1621 N. Kent Street, Suite 200,
Arlington, VA 22209-2131. Requests for the RFP should be faxed to the
IRC, TDA at 703-875-4009. In the fax, please include your firm's name,
contact person, address, and telephone number. Some firms have found
that RFP materials sent by U.S. mail do not reach them in time for
preparation of an adequate response. Firms that want TDA to use an
overnight delivery service should include the name of the delivery
service and your firm's account number in the request for the RFP.
Firms that want to send a courier to TDA to retrieve the RFP should
allow one hour after faxing the request to TDA before scheduling a
pick-up. Please note that no telephone requests for the RFP will be
honored. Please check your internal fax verification receipt. Because
of the large number of RFP requests, TDA cannot respond to requests for
fax verification. Requests for RFPs received before 4:00 PM will be
mailed the same day. Requests received after 4:00 PM will be mailed the
following day. Please check with your courier and/or mail room before
calling TDA. Only U.S. firms and individuals may bid on this TDA
financed activity. Interested firms, their subcontractors and employees
of all participants must qualify under TDA's nationality requirements
as of the due date for submission of qualifications and proposals and,
if selected to carry out the TDA-financed activity, must continue to
meet such requirements throughout the duration of the TDA-financed
activity. All goods and services to be provided by the selected firm
shall have their nationality, source and origin in the U.S. or host
country. The Ministry of Transport REQUIRES that at least 15 percent of
the grant funds MUST be spent locally (on host-country subcontractors).
The U.S. firm may use subcontractors from the host country for up to 20
percent of the TDA grant amount. Details of TDA's nationality
requirements and mandatory contract clauses are also included in the
RFP. Interested U.S. firms should submit their Proposal in English
directly to the Grantee by 11:00 a.m., Friday, December 31, 1999, at
the above address. Evaluation criteria for the Proposal are included in
the RFP. Price will not be a factor in contractor selection, and
therefore, cost proposals should NOT be submitted. The Grantee reserves
the right to reject any and/or all Proposals. The Grantee also reserves
the right to contract with the selected firm for subsequent work
related to the project. The Grantee is not bound to pay for any costs
associated with the preparation and submission of Proposals.*****
Posted 11/18/99 (W-SN401783). (0322) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0011 19991122\B-0001.SOL)
B - Special Studies and Analyses - Not R&D Index Page
|
|