|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF DECEMBER 20,1999 PSA#2499Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Procurement
Operations Branch, MS2500, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, Virginia
20170-4817 B -- DESIGN OF A MONITORING PROTOCAL/PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT/DEVELOPMENT OF FEDERAL OFFSHORE SAND BORROW AREAS SOL
1435-01-00-RP-31051 DUE 011400 POC Lisa Goins-Berntsen, Contracting
Offficer, (703) 787-1359 E-MAIL: lisa.goins@mms.gov,
lisa.goins@mms.gov. The United States (U. S.) Government, and
specifically, the Minerals Management Service (MMS), a bureau within
the U. S. Department of the Interior, has jurisdiction over all mineral
resources on the Federal OCS. Public Law 103-426, enacted October 31,
1994, gave the MMS the authority to convey, on a noncompetitive basis,
the rights to OCS sand, gravel, or shell resources for shore
protection, beach or wetlands restoration projects, or for use in
construction projects funded in whole or part or authorized by the
Federal Government. The Shore Protection Provisions of the Water
Resource Development Act of 1999 (S. 507 as passed by Congress on
August 4, 1999) amended that law by prohibiting charging non-Federal
interests a fee for using OCS sand. To date, MMS has provided sand to
the U.S. Navy to restore the beach at the Navy's Fleet Combat Training
Center at Dam Neck, Virginia, to Duval County, Florida to renourish
Jacksonville Beach, to the City of Virginia Beach to renourish
Sandbridge Beach, and to the Park Service and the State of Maryland for
the restoration of portions of Assateague Island. In the last several
years severe storms and nor'easters have caused unprecedented damage to
coastal resort towns along the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts, resulting in
severe beach erosion and economic losses. High storm waters have
carried away vast amounts of beach sand and breached dune systems,
which protect the coastal areas and provide a source of revenue for
many beach communities. Many of these areas will require extensive
nourishment in the near-term to offset this damage and to prevent
further damage in the event of future storms. The first line of defense
against coastal storm damage is the beach and nearshore zone. Damage
assessments conducted after the passage of severe storms have
conclusively shown that, for areas where a wide expanse of beach or
coastal sand is in-place, damage from flooding is greatly diminished
or, in many cases, minimal. Where the beach is narrow or non-existent,
there is no mechanism by which the wave energy can be broken down.
SCOPE OF WORK: The study's objective is two-fold: (1) To provide the
MMS with an appropriate and sound design for a physical/biological
monitoring system to evaluate the near-term, long-term, and cumulative
effects of using Federal sand borrow areas on the U.S. East and Gulf
Coasts; (2) To examine the feasibility and appropriateness of including
Federal, State, and local authorities with an interest in the use of
offshore Federal sand in a regional management concept for developing
ways to assure and monitor the responsible, environmentally sound
long-term management of Federal offshore sand areas. In Year 1 of the
project: (1) Design and deliver to the MMS protocols for field
monitoring systems to evaluate the physical and biological effects of
using Federal offshore borrow areas on a near-term (one beach
nourishment event) and long-term, cumulative basis (using the same
borrow area on a continuous long-term basis to renourish a nearby beach
or beaches); (2) Evaluate the feasibility/appropriateness/desirability
of putting such a monitoring system into place taking into account:
(a) cost factors to put these monitoring systems into place (b)the
availability and suitability of environmental information for making
lease decisions (c)the types of dredging operations and projects which
should be monitored; and in addition, identify the need for collecting
supplemental biological data or physical modeling information in the
Federal borrows areas; (4) Identify, review, and evaluate needed
environmental work and/or mechanisms (organizational, economic) to
offset any potential adverse impacts; (5) Identify the need for and
collection of any additional geological/geophysical data to define
available sand supplies for planned projects within the study area; (6)
Examine the feasibility/desirability of incorporating Federal, State,
and local players with different interests and authorities in such a
way that they benefit from an overall strategy to develop ways to
assure and monitor the responsible, environmentally sound long-term and
cost-effective management of Federal offshore sand areas and identify
the relevant parties and authorities who should participate. In Year 2
of the study: If, in Year 1 of the study, the study team determines
that it is feasible and appropriate to manage Federal offshore sand
resources on a regional basis, develop detailed plans and fully
identify the relevant parties by geographic area to meet the needs of
Federal, State, and local interests to facilitate the environmentally
acceptable and cost-effective near and long-term use of Federal sand
borrow areas offshore the U.S. East and Gulf of Mexico coasts. In light
of these issues and concerns, the MMS intends to competitively award a
contract: To provide the Agency with an appropriate and sound design
for a physical/biological monitoring system to evaluate the near-term,
long-term, and cumulative effects of using Federal sand borrow areas
on the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts; To examine the feasibility and
appropriateness of including Federal, State, and local authorities with
an interest in the use of offshore Federal sand in a regional
management concept for developing ways to assure and monitor the
responsible, environmentally sound long-term management of Federal
offshore sand areas. The period of performance of the resultant
contract will be twenty-five (25) months with an estimated value of
$300,000 to $375,000. In order to compete for this contract, an offeror
must demonstrate that they are qualified to perform the work by
providing, not later than COB JANUARY 14, 2000, a Capabilities
Statement describing in detail: (A) Key personnel with the expertise
and experience to conduct the described multidisciplinary program. The
project team will be required to have: (1) A Program Manager (PM) with
extensive environmental and coastal planning expertise to oversee all
major management and technical aspects of the project; (2) A technical
team composed of marine biologists, physical oceanographers, marine
geologists, coastal engineers and planners, and dredging engineers
experienced in designing coastal management systems and familiar with
studies of offshore environments, dredging effects, and coastal erosion
techniques. (3) Principal scientists must collectively illustrate
relevant experience in the scientific disciplines demonstrated through
authorship in appropriate peer-reviewed publications, work history,
and professional affiliations. (B) The organization's expertise with
this type of work and a description of your facilities and resources;
and (C) Specific references (including project identifier and
description, period of performance, dollar amount, and client name and
phone number) for previous work of this nature that your organization
or personnel is currently performing or has completed within the last
three (3) years. REFERENCES WILL BE CHECKED. Offerors shall submit
their Capabilities Statement in original and four (4) copies to Lisa
Goins-Berntsen, Contracting Officer, Minerals Management Service,
381Elden Street, MS-2500, Herndon Virginia 20170-4817. Timeliness of
receipt of submissions will be determined by the time received in the
Procurement Operations Branch, Herndon, Virginia. Your Capabilities
Statement will be evaluated based on: (A) Experience and expertise of
all technical Key Personnel, their experience in the types of work
proposed, and demonstrated ability to do the work. Scientific/technical
personnel must collectively demonstrate relevant experience in the
scientific/technical disciplines demonstrated through authorship in
appropriate peer reviewed publications or appropriate work-related
experience. Evaluation factors include (1). The length and quality of
experience for each person assigned to perform specific tasks. (2). The
level and quality of formal education in the disciplines and technical
fields necessary, examining the level of relevant education attained
as well as, honors, awards, and recognition of previous work. (3).
Experience on similar programs on the U.S. East Coast and Gulf of
Mexico or in similar areas zoogeographically and oceanographically. (B)
The Project Manager shall have: (1) experience and demonstrated
leadership ability required for the coordination of the study process,
(2) experience in managing a large multi-disciplinary team and the
interdisciplinary processes required for this study, and (3) ability to
control costs and to keep project performance and document preparation
on schedule; and (C) Your organization's history of (1) successful
completion of similar projects (similar in size, scope, complexity,
duration, and dollar value), (2) producing high-quality documents, and
(3) conducting similar projects on schedule and within budget.
Questions should be faxed to Lisa Goins-Berntsen at (703) 787-1387 or
e-mailed to Lisa.Goins@mms.gov. All correspondence should include the
RFP number, your full name/company name, address and phone and fax
numbers. Requests or questions by telephone are strongly discouraged.
See Note 1 Posted 12/16/99 (W-SN409149). (0350) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0007 19991220\B-0001.SOL)
B - Special Studies and Analyses - Not R&D Index Page
|
|