|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 PSA#2527National Imagery And Mapping Agency, PCO-E Mail Stop D-5, 4600
Sangamore Road, Bethesda, MD 20816-5003 A -- DRAFT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ANNOUNCEMENT-NIMA PRODUCTION
SERVICES DEVELOPMENTAL CONTRACT SOL NMA301-00-RA-001 POC Brian Wolfe,
Contracting Officer, WolfeB@nima.mil; John Simon, Technical PoC,
SimonJ@nima.mil WEB: DRAFT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ANNOUNCEMENT-NIMA
PRODUCTION, http://164.214.2.59/poc/contracts/contracts.html. E-MAIL:
Brian Wolfe, Contracting Officer, WolfeB@nima.mil. DRAFT RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT ANNOUNCEMENT-NIMA PRODUCTION SERVICES DEVELOPMENTAL
CONTRACT -- This draft is submitted to solicit industry comment.
Comments should be submitted prior to 15 Feb 00. There is no commitment
to publish a firm solicitation. The National Imagery and Mapping Agency
(NIMA) is soliciting proposals for developmental services to facilitate
production under existing NIMA production contracts. I. Background.
Prior to the current NIMA Omnibus contracts for geospatial production
services, NIMA solicited various types of contracts to develop an
industrial base that was able to support the outsourcing of geospatial
production based upon NTM imagery. These contracts were awarded on a
cost-type basis due to the risk inherent in developmental projects.
Similarly, the need to develop an industrial base capable of supporting
geospatial production based upon commercial and other non-NTM sources
is also required, as well as the ability to advance current NTM-based
production services as newtechnologies become available. Experience
with the NIMA Omnibus Contracts has demonstrated that the award
criteria for those production vehicles are less desirable for
developmental requirements to enhance production under Omnibus due to
the associated cost risk and a lack of developmental-related award
criteria. The Omnibus contracts have QBS production-based award
criteria such as performance-based production and current production
capacity and are awarded on a firm fixed price basis consistent with
mature production processes. Efforts of a more developmental nature
such as initial and/or related production services such as first
article testing, prototyping, production benchmarking, technical
studies, or advancing the state of the art of production tools and
processes typically include unknowns which placed an inordinate cost
risk upon the contractor. This solicitation is intended to augment
NIMA's current geospatial production service contracts to provide
developmental capabilities; and is not intended as a replacement for
the current Omnibus production contracts. Production services for
non-developmental requirements will continue to be procured utilizing
existing Omnibus production service contracts. Resulting tools and
technologies shall subsequently be made available to the NIMA
production contracts, resulting in a more robust overall geospatial
production program. Therefore, any products resulting from these
developmental task orders must provide rights to use those products by
either NIMA or NIMA production contractors (in the performance of NIMA
contracts), whether by negotiated licenses or other negotiated
contract/agreement provisions. The minimum value of any
contract/agreement resulting from this solicitation shall be the value
of the first task issued under the applicable contract/agreement and
the maximum value shall be $10,000,000.00. This solicitation is not
related to the NIMA Technical Support Contract solicitation where more
generic R&D tools will be developed. A pre-solicitation (for the final
BAA) conference shall be held (TBD days after release of this BAA into
the public domain) at [location TBD], [time TBD), [date TBD) and
[location TBD]. II. Requirements. A. General Requirement (Scope). This
requirements is soliciting proposals for task order vehicles to: (1)
develop software tools/systems to support geospatial and intelligence
gathering and exploitation requirements; (2) provide support to Omnibus
vendors regarding source ingestion and exploitation of newly emerging
NTM sources, the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), and
commercial imagery; (3) create production prototypes for geospatial and
intelligence data and NIMA-specific products. benchmark
geospatial/intelligence production processes utilizing new NTM sources,
SRTM, and newly emerging commercial sources (products may include but
is no limited to CIB, FFD, DTED, DPPDB, Geopositioning, TLM, Aero, and
Airfields); (4) prepare studies relating to production processes for
NIMA-specific products; (5) maintain data bases/associated data base
tools; (6) establish collaborative computing tools; (7) develop
processes for moving imagery files, geospatial files, and intelligence
files among different geographic locations; (8) provide technical
support ongoing geospatial and intelligence gathering requirements; and
(9) develop change detection applications for imagery intelligence
utilizing commercial imagery. B. Source Materials. This announcement is
intended to support current and future geospatial and intelligence
developmental production service requirements for the exploitation of:
(1) NTM Imagery; (2) other DoD imagery; (3) commercial Imagery; (4)
SRTM data (Interferometric Height Elevation Data); (5) Geospatial and
Intelligence Information; and (6) any other source deemed necessary to
support both geospatial and intelligence requirements. C. Near Term
Requirements. Several products require near term solutions with regards
to the new commercial imagery and SRTM. These include: (1)
hyperspectral, multispectral and geospatial applications utilizing NTM,
commercial imagery, and/or SRTM; (2) digital terrain elevation software
application tools and prototypes derived from both commercial imagery
and SRTM; (3) controlled image base (CIB) and/or orthorectified image
prototypes derived from both commercial imagery and SRTM; (4) DPPDB
(Digital Point Positioning Data Bases) or precisely controlled
stereographic image prototypes from commercial imagery; (5) Foundation
Feature Data prototypes and studies utilizing commercial imagery; (6)
City Image prototypes utilizing commercial imagery; (7) Topographic
Line Map prototypes utilizing commercial imagery; and (8) Airfield
Vertical Obstruction Data capture techniques utilizing commercial
imagery and SRTM. III. Proposal Requirements This BAA is soliciting two
types of proposals, both of which must be submitted by a team in order
to be considered for award: a teaming proposal (addressing the
collective capabilities to perform developmental projects across the
spectrum of the general requirements stated above to serve as the basis
for an task order contract), and one or (up to three) technical
proposals addressing potential solutions to the near term requirements
stated above which may be issued as initial tasks under a task order
contract/agreement. A. Teaming Proposal The first type of proposal is
a teaming proposal intended to be used to evaluate the ability of the
proposed team to execute developmental proposals which address the nine
general requirements addressed above. This proposal shall be the basis
for negotiations regarding any base task order contract awarded
pursuant to this solicitation. Entities with research and development
capabilities in the desired areas are encouraged to team either by
forming a prime/subcontractor relationship or by forming a consortium
to host the broadest possible core capability across the general
requirements spectrum stated above. Offers consisting of consortium
proposals must include the consortium's Articles of Collaboration. NIMA
intends to award as few task order contracts or other business
agreements (e.g., other transactions, flexible cooperative agreements,
technology investment agreements, cooperative research and development
agreements) as possible in order to establish broad geospatial
developmental capabilities among a few teams, each of whom collectively
meet the above criteria. Technical proposals must, therefore, first of
all demonstrate how the team collectively meets the capabilities to
perform the breadth of the general requirements delineated in (II)(A)
above. Discussion should include a detailed explanation of how the
teams propose to manage risk and track earned value. In addition,
proposals must reflect proven technical capabilities, collective
experience and past performance points of contact regarding recent
contracts of a similar nature. Team proposals must include a pricing
proposal providing fully burdened rates for labor, applicable fully
burdened hourly laboratory/equipment rates or departmental rates, and
typical material or other prices likely to be involved in multiple
tasks. For each labor category employing a separate rate, provide the
job title and typical experience, education, training, certifications,
etc. expected for that labor category and rate. All prices and fully
burdened rates will be compared to other prices and fully burdened
rates employed by similar companies and job descriptions in order to
determine price reasonableness. Final negotiated rates for any task
order agreements awarded shall be used for negotiating subsequent task
orders. Teams may propose rates for up to three option years which may
only be changed bilaterally with legal consideration. B. Near Term Task
Proposals Teams must also propose fully priced developmental proposals
addressing one (or up to three) of the near-term requirements
addressed above, which can be awarded as initial task orders under a
resulting task order contract/agreement. The price breakout should
reflect the number of hours per labor category, the job title. IV
Proposal Evaluation Criteria A. Team Base Task Order Agreement Proposal
Evaluation Criteria (addressing general requirements). Evaluation
criteria of equal value are: (1) Technical understanding as
demonstrated by (a) previous relevant developmental experience; (b)
knowledge of COTS/GOTS geospatial and intelligence platforms; and (c)
past performance on previous production and/or developmental contracts;
(2) Reasonableness of proposed fully burdened labor rates; (3)
Technical management as indicated by proposed procedures to manage risk
and track earned value; and (4) Ability to provide real-time progress
reporting via internet, payment via government IMPAC VISA card, and
other administration streamlining capabilities. B. Task Order
Evaluation Criteria (addressing near term requirements). (1) Ability of
the result of a proposed task to be integrated into the existing USIGS
architecture and environment. (2) Scientific and technical merits of
the proposed task to include (a) the degree to which proposed
objectives support the targeted near term requirements and (b) validity
of the technical basis for the approach offered; and (3) Relevance and
potential contributions of the proposed task to the objectives of the
Omnibus or other NIMA production programs. Other evaluation criteria,
of lesser importance than (l), (2) and (3) above but equal to each
other, are: (1) The proposed justification for proposed labor mix and
proposed quantity of labor hours related to the applicable task order
(i.e., a brief but sufficient narrative explaining how each of these
were calculated in relation to the applicable task) and; (2) The
adequacy of current or planned facilities and equipment to accomplish
the task objectives; and (3) The realism and reasonableness of prices
or any proposed cost sharing. V. Proposal Submission Requirements
Proposals shall be submitted electronically via simultaneous e-mail to
WolfeB@nima.mil and SimonJ@nima.mil or file transfer protocol to
ftp://164.214.2.65/pub/contracts/pco/wolfeb/baa with a simultaneous
e-mail notification of the transfer to WolfeB@nima.mil and
SimonJ@nima.mil. An e-mail acknowledgement of receipt shall be returned
to all proposals received by the due date/time which is 2:00 p.m. on
[TBD in Final BAA]. Adjustments shall be made for any submission
difficulties resulting from verifiable NIMA network problems on the due
date. Notification of selections (or status of evaluation if additional
time is required) shall occur via e-mail from the
Contracting/Agreements Officer not later than [TBD in final BAA].
Pricing proposals shall be submitted via electronic spreadsheet
containing no external cell references and must be readable by
Microsoft Excel (Office 97 version). Technical proposals shall be
readable by Microsoft Word (Office 97 version). VI. Contract/Agreement
Type Offerors may propose any legal contractual vehicle. Examples
include a contract subject the Federal Acquisition Regulation and
subordinate agency (DoD/NIMA) supplements, a flexible cooperative
agreement subject to the DoD Grants and Agreement Regulation, another
transaction for prototype subject to Section 845 of Public Law 104-201
(a sample can be viewed at
http://www.afmc-mil.wpafb.af.mil/organizations/HQ-AFMC/PK/pkt/sampleot
.doc) or an other transaction for R&D pursuant to U.S.C. 2371. If an
agreement pursuant to U.S.C. 2371is proposed, 50% cost share is
required to be incorporated into the proposal, though cost share is not
an evaluation criteria. All offers proposing other than a
FAR/DFARS-covered contract must document the benefit to NIMA in
awarding an alternative business agreement. VII. Mandatory Contractual
Requirements: The following requirements shall apply to any
contract/agreement resulting from this solicitation: A. Offeror shall
ensure and acknowledge in the proposal that all information technology
developed under the vehicles or proposed to be developed shall be Year
2000 compliant as defined at FAR 39.002. In addition, the following two
clauses shall be included in any resulting contract/agreement: B. NIMA
Clause 5552.227-9000 Unauthorized Use of NIMA Name, Seal, and
Initials. As provided in 10 U.S.C. 2422, no person may, except with the
written permission of the Director, National Imagery and Mapping
Agency, knowingly use the words "National Imagery and Mapping Agency"
or "Defense Mapping Agency", the initials "NIMA" or "DMA", the seal of
the National Imagery and Mapping Agency or the Defense Mapping Agency,
or any colorable imitation of such words, initials, or seal in
connection with any merchandise, retail product, impersonation,
solicitation, or commercial activity in a manner reasonably calculated
to convey the impression that such use is approved, endorsed, or
authorized by the Director, NIMA. Whenever it appears to the Director,
NIMA that any person is engaged or about to engage in an act or
practice which constitutes or will constitute conduct prohibited by
paragraph (a), the Attorney General may initiate a civil proceeding in
a district court of the United States to enjoin such act or practice.
Such court shall proceed as soon as practicable to hearing and
determination of such action and may, at any time before such final
determination, enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take
such other action as is warranted, to prevent injury to the United
States, or to any person or class of persons for whose protection the
action is brought. (end of clause). C. DFARS Clause 252.204-7000
Disclosure of Information. (DEC 1991) (a) The Contractor shall not
release to anyone outside the Contractor's organization any
unclassified information, regardless of medium (e.g., film, tape,
document), pertaining to any part of this contract or any program
related to this contract, unless-(1) The Contracting Officer has given
prior written approval; or (2) The information is otherwise in the
public domain before the date of release. (b) Requests for approval
shall identify the specific information to be released, the medium to
be used, and the purpose for the release. The Contractor shall submit
its request to the Contracting Officer at least 45 days before the
proposed date for release. (c) The Contractor agrees to include a
similar requirement in each subcontract under this contract.
Subcontractors shall submit requests for authorization to release
through the prime contractor to the Contracting Officer. (End of
clause) VIII. Central Contractor Registry IMPORTANT NOTICE: DFARS
252.204-7004 "Required Central Contract Registration" (Mar 1998)
applies to all solicitations issued on/after 1 Jun 98. Lack of
registration in the CCR database will make a offeror ineligible for
award of a contract/agreement. Proposals must reflect compliance or
initiation of compliance with this regulation. Call 1-888-227-2423 or
access via internet at http://ccr.edi.disa.mil for more information.
Offeror's DUNS number (and CAGE code if one has been assigned) must
accompany proposal in order to verify CCR registration. Proposals must
identify the offeror's taxpayer identification number and the e-mail
addresses of the cognizant DCAA offices for each applicable team
member. In addition, proposals must identify the e-mail addresses for
the offerors' technical and contractual points of contact. IX. Required
Proposal Certifications: A. Other Business Agreements: At a minimum the
following shall apply to any award made pursuant to this announcement:
Executive Order 12549, Debarred/Suspended status; Public Law 100-690,
Drug Free Workplace; DoD Directive 5500.11, Nondiscrimination in
Federally Assisted Programs, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
Section 1352, Title 31, USC (Public Law 101-121, Section 319),
Limitation on Use of Appropriated Funds to Influence Certain Federal
Contracting and Financial Transactions. Offerors proposing alternative
business agreements must fax a certification of compliance
(referencing NMA301-99-RA-001 and signed by an individual with the
authority to bind the offering entity on any resulting contract or
agreement) regarding the offeror's status and compliance with these
minimum requirements to the Contracting/Agreements Officer, Brian
Wolfe, at (301) 227-2536 (primary) or (301) 227-4793 (alternate). B.
Offerors proposing a FAR/DFARS-covered contract must download and
complete the applicable certifications located on the internet at
http://farsite.hill.af.mil/mades/clause/199908sk.htm and fax to the
numbers identified above (referencing NMA301-00-RA-001 and signed by an
individual with the authority to bind the offering entity on any
resulting contract or agreement) regarding the offeror's status and
compliance with each delineated certification to the
Contracting/Agreements Officer, Brian Wolfe, at (301) 227-2536
(primary) or (301) 227-4793 (alternate). ATTENTION: Facsimiles shall be
both required and accepted for certifications only. Facsimiles of the
pricing and technical proposals will not be accepted. This announcement
represents the totality of available information regarding this
acquisition. Requests for hard copies of this CBD announcements will
not be honored. Interested parties may stay apprised of this
solicitation including revision information and answers to submitted
questions by occasionally referring to the NIMA/PC public web site at
http://164.214.2.59/poc/contracts/contracts.html. Questions and
comments are encouraged regarding this draft solicitation. Posted
01/28/00 (W-SN419749). (0028) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0001 20000201\A-0001.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|