|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 14,2000 PSA#2536Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Procurement
Operations Branch, MS2500, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, Virginia
20170-4817 B -- COMMUTE EMPLOYMENT: IMPLICATIONS AND BEST PRACTICE APPROACHES SOL
0100RQ17067 DUE 031300 POC Dotty Quinn, Contracting Officer, (703)
787-1365 DESCRIPTION: The Department of the Interior, Minerals
Management Service intends to competitively award a purchase order to
study the effects of commute employment and the options for managing
them in the offshore oil and gas industry. The contact period is one
year (12 months) from the date of award. The cost is estimated to be no
more than $100,000. The following information describes the prospective
efforts and advises potential offerors how to respond. PLEASE READ THIS
ENTIRE NOTICE CARFULLY AS IT CONSTITUTES THE ONLY NOTICE THAT WIL BE
ISSUED. BACKGROUND: Commute Employment (sometimes called fly-in' or
long distance commute' employment) is characterized by a regular,
repeated, pattern of work in which workers travel to a worksite
(typically remote), for a specific work period (often a week or more)
where all accommodations are provided by the employer, and then; leave
the worksite and reside elsewhere with their families (if any) for a
specified non-work period (also often a week or more). Indeed,commute
employment differs from the traditional work systems principally
because of the regularity of the extended work/non-work rotation
pattern and the distinctive nature of the
place-of-work/place-of-residence relationships. Other characteristics,
such as the extended work day and shift arrangements, are important
elements in the system. Commute work has implications for a variety of
work, family, community and regional issues. The commute employment
pattern was originally developed to meet the needs of the offshore oil
and gas industry. Today it is estimated that the total global offshore
oil and gas workforce is at about a quarter of a million people
(International Labor Organization, 1993). As such the commute system
gives rise to certain concerns that may be problematic for workers and
their employers which reflects on MMS's responsibility to protect the
human, marine and coastal environments. These problems may be related
to health and safety, training or lack of, employment-related
concerns, employee's families and the communities or regions in which
they live. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to examine
the effects of commute employment and the options for managing them in
the offshore oil and gas industry. This study will examine this with an
emphasis on deepwater patterns and hazardous environments. SCOPE OF
WORK: The objectives will be accomplished through three components.
First, an annotated bibliography on commute employment will be
developed through a literature review. Second, a discussion paper and
best practices guide will build on the annotated bibliography and
existing literature. Finally, the discussion paper and best practices
guide will be distributed to those working in this area and provide the
basis for an international review workshop at which participants would
comment on the research findings and discuss their experiences,
insights, practices and policies related to these matters for
incorporation into the discussion paper. The analysis will be conducted
at the international level. First the contractor shall conduct a
literature review of important papers on commute employment, its
effects and management that will be used to create an annotated
bibliography, best practices guide to commute employment and discussion
paper. The papers and reports will be selected in consultation with the
MMS so as to ensure that the bibliography, best practices guide and
discussion paper provides valuable input to ongoing MMS studies. Second
the contractor shall conduct an international review workshop at which
participants would comment on findings of the literature review and
discuss other experiences, insights, practices and policies relevant to
these matters. Finally, the contractor shall produce a discussion paper
providing a summary of the use of commute employment pertaining to its
effects, as revealed by the literature, key informants and
professional knowledge of the principal investigators. In addition the
paper will discuss examples of best practices designed to optimize
these effects; and an analysis of the implications of these examples
for OCS operations in the Gulf of Mexico, Pacific and Alaska regions as
well as international, focusing particularly on deepwater and hazardous
locations. CAPABILITY STATEMENT, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL AND PROGRAM
MANAGEMENT PLAN: In order to compete for this contract, an offeror must
submit a CAPABILITY STATEMENT. Describe in detail: (1) the
qualifications and specific experience of the key personnel who will
have the primary responsibility for performing and managing the
project; (2) the organization's experience with this type of work and
a description of the facilities to be used; and (3) specific references
(including project identifier and description, period of performance,
dollar amount, client name and telephone number) for previous work of
this nature that the organization and or key personnel has completed
within the last two years or is currently performing. Also include any
negative references and a rebuttal explanation. References will be
checked to validate the information provided. Descriptions of key
personnel should include their familiarity and understanding of OCS
activities and the resulting social and economics impacts in the United
States as well as Globally. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. This proposal shall
describe the methodologies that will be employed in order to achieve
the Study Objectives. This shall consist of a discussion: (1) of your
understanding of the project i.e. the purpose, scope, and issues; (2)
your approach to completing the project; and (3) the level of
difficulty you anticipate in successfully completing this project,
identifying any potential problems, and your intended solutions. The
components of the Scope of Work should be described with consideration
to social science, thus, utilizing methodologies and theories
particular to the conceptual phenomena under investigation. PROGRAM
MANAGEMENT PLAN: Fully discuss your plans and procedures for managing
the project, your criteria for quality assurance, and for ensuring the
acceptability of the end products. Discuss your organization of the
project team and plans for monitoring the activities of all project
personnel. Indicate any positions necessary for contract performance
that are presently not filled and the anticipated date of assignment or
new hire. Provide information about the work you expect to subcontract
or assign to consultants. Explain the criteria you use to select
proposed subcontractors and/or consultants. Key project personnel may
also address any other topics considered to be pertinent to a
demonstration of the knowledge, competence, and capability to perform
this effort. EVALUATION FACTORS: CAPABILITY STATEMENT will be evaluated
based on the following factors: (1) The skills, abilities, education,
professional credential and experience of the proposed key personnel;
(2) The experience and past performance of the organization, including
number, size, location of projects and complexity of similar projects
completed by the proposed project team and organization; and (3) Past
performance includes adherence to budgets and schedules, effectiveness
of cost control, the acceptability of previous products delivered,
effectiveness of program management and the offerors willingness to
cooperate with customers in both routine and unexpected matters.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION: (1) Documentation of specific methods and
techniques, detailing how each task will be performed; (2) Overall
comprehensiveness and quality of the proposal; (3) Demonstrating
understanding of the work, including creativity and thoroughness which
supports the appropriateness of all proposed methodologies, analyses,
etc. to be used in accomplishing the tasks; and (4) Anticipation of
potential problem areas, and creativity/feasibility of proposed problem
solution recommendations. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN EVALUATION: (1)
Evidence that there will be a committee Program Manager with sufficient
management experience and resources and an adequate scheduling plan to
ensure successful and timely completion of the project; (2) Evidence
and sufficiency of a data management plan and system designed to ensure
continuous evidence of data possession, comparison, and security; and
(3) Appropriate mix and balance of education and training. COST
PROPOSAL INFORMATION: The cost proposal shall include a statement that
the offeror intends to comply with the Statement of Work. The cost
proposal shall be broken down as follows: (1) Breakdown of direct labor
cost by named person or labor category, including number of labor hours
and current actual or average hourly rate; (2) The amount proposed for
travel, subsistence, and local transportation supported with a
breakdown which includes: number of trips anticipated, cost per trip
per person, destination (s); proposed number of person(s) scheduled for
travel, mode of transportation and mileage allowances if privately
owned vehicles will be used; (3) Cost breakdown of materials and other
direct costs including duplication/reproduction, meetings and
conferences/workshops, postage, communication and any other applicable
items; (4) If consultants are proposed, detailed data concerning
proposed consultant costs should include: (1) names of consultant(s) to
be engaged; (2) daily fees to be paid to each consultant; (3) estimated
number of days of consulting services; (4) consulting agreements
entered into between consultant(s) and the offeror, or invoices
submitted by consultant(s) for similar services previously provided to
the offeror; and (5) rationale for acceptance of consultants costs.
HOW TO RESPOND: Offerors must submit by COB March 13, 2000, the
original Technical Proposal, Capability Statement and three (3)
duplicate copies to Ms. Dottie Quinn, Contracting Officer, Minerals
Management Service, Procurement Operations Branch. 381 Elden Street. MS
2510, Hemdon, VA 20170-4817. Three (3) additional copies must be
submitted to Ms. Connie Landry, Procurement Coordinator, Minerals
Management Service: Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, 1201 Elmwood Park Blvd.,
MS 5431, New Orleans, LA 70123-2394. Posted 02/10/00 (W-SN424070).
(0041) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0017 20000214\B-0004.SOL)
B - Special Studies and Analyses - Not R&D Index Page
|
|