|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MAY 3,2000 PSA#2592Office of Space Launch, SAF/SL, 2420 Vela Way, Suite 1467-A5, El
Segundo, CA 90245-4659 D -- REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) FOR A THREE-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATION
AND MODELING SYSTEM SOL OSL RFI #CCAFS-001 DUE 060900 POC POC Contact
BILL SCHUPP, (321) 730-6239 The National Reconnissance Office (NRO)
Office of Space Launch (OSL) is posting this RFI to conduct market
research and to encourage Information Technology companies to provide
comments and suggestions about current commercial industry practices
and products pertaining to Three-dimensional modeling and simulation.
All information received in response to this RFI will be used for
planning purposes and utilized to develop an acquisition strategy for
a Three-dimensional Visualization and Modeling system. Plans for
initial system deployment are for 15 systems in 5 geographically
dispersed metropolitan areas across the United States. We envision the
eventual deployment of a system at each one of our satellite, booster
and support facilities of our mission partners. This is not a formal
solicitation under FAR Part 14 or 15; however, it is anticipated that
only those firms responding to this RFI will be invited to participate
in any acquisition that may result from this RFI. Functional
requirements are identified in the following paragraphs to provide a
starting point and to assist in establishing an understanding of
capabilities we are seeking. Our vision is to eventually implement
virtual technologies across the organization to enhance our launch
processing and increase our overall quality of processing, planning,
engineering support and problem resolution. These functional
requirements are described at the business level. We are hoping that
several options will be presented that will address future systems
capabilities and any budgetary consideration. System Overview The
Three-dimensional Visualization and Modeling System is expected to
support fully interactive, real-time, virtual, three-dimensional
scenarios in a distributed collaborative network environment. The
system will facilitate launch site processing, planning, engineering
and operations analysis, and anomaly resolution. The system will be
used to evaluate effectiveness of proposed launch site facility
modifications, operational processing scenarios, engineering
assessment/analysis, procedure development and evaluation as well as
providing realistic demonstrations of launch site facilities and
capabilities. The capabilities we seek are outlined below. Please don't
limit your vision to what we have established thus far. 1. Modeling
This capability will apply to all mission processing and support
facilities, generic Ground Support Equipment (GSE), mission unique GSE,
satellite vehicles and boosters. Generic GSE includes, but is not
limited to, items such as man-lifts, scissors lifts, work stands,
scaffolding, air pallets, transporters, hoists, cranes, and drive
tractors that are used by multiple spacecraft customers. Unique GSE
references items that are developed and built to support a specific
spacecraft, such as adapter rings, lifting fixtures, work stands,
environmental housing, etc.  Each system must be capable of
producing and exercising three-dimensional virtual models of each
payload/spacecraft vehicle processing and launch facility, GSE, and
spacecraft vehicles in close tolerances. The models must be very
accurate in size, form, fit, and function and shall reflect actual
build accuracy.  The system must import CAD drawings and
tessellate these drawings into models without degrading the performance
of the host hardware or distorting the subject's original parameters,
appearance, and accuracy. CAD drawings for items such as spacecraft and
manufacture drawings on some GSE usually have sufficient accuracy to
support required accuracy while others may require alteration to
support engineering analysis.  The system must have
provisions or processes for validating accuracy of models/simulation
capability prior to using the modeling tool to support a space program.
Describe the means you would use to validate the accuracy of these
models and the precision of your approach. 2. Simulation Requirements
Simulate actual capabilities of each facility to include such items as
platforms, cranes, doors, etc. Functionality of each modeled GSE must
simulate actual capabilities, form, function, size and action of the
real GSE.  The system should have the ability to perform
Processing Simulation and produce as-run script of each simulated
scenario  Fully interactive human factor engineering
capable of supporting workflow and full physics based motion. This
feature allows us to interject the human factor into the virtual
environment.  Capability of virtual simulation to perform
Polygon to Polygon proximity alarm and collision detection and
indication of collision occurrence.  The system should be
capable of simulating launch vehicle and spacecraft ascent operations
utilizing real time telemetry and displaying actual and predicted
ascent through deployment.  Ability to perform time
compression of operations simulated. 3. Collaboration System must be
capable of operating in a distributed network configuration and
facilitate collaboration in near real-time. It should allow interaction
between all sites connected to the network simultaneously and each muse
be able to see what the others are doing as well as have the capability
to control the remote system to facilitate interaction. Network
collaboration must not be network bandwidth intensive. Additionally,
the ability to view collaboration at multiple sites without
modeling/simulation system specific software is desirable. 4. Operation
and Configuration System must be capable of stand-alone operations
(autonomous) and support collaboration with all other sites that have
the modeling and simulation systems.  Hardware and software
must be under configuration management program.  Identify
Network interface, both LAN and WAN requirements and interfaces
associated with your approach.  All systems must have the
same baseline software and drawings/models. 5. System External
Interface Requirements Video and Displays  The interface
between the local processor and local display, keyboard and mouse shall
allow these local control devices to be at least 25 feet from the
processor.  Ability to produce/view multiple simulated
scenes on a single or multiple display.  Ability to
produce/view multiple scenes on multiple display.  Display
information in high-resolution at least 1024X1268els pixels per inch.
 Support SVGA, XGVA, RGB (HV), NTSC, Super 8, and firewire
interfaces.  Ability to record real-time modeling
activities in video formats. Hard and Soft Copy Outputs 
Hard copy of the data collected during modeling or simulation shall be
available via printer at remote and local locations. 
Ability to produce presentation quality pictures and videos to include
Concept of Operations documents, presentations and procedures. 6.
Computer Security The system needs to be capable of operating in a
classified environment. Therefore, it is necessary that the system
comply with AISM 200 and DCID 6-2. 7. Computer Hardware and Software
 Identify the equipment you would recommend for each
location. For the purpose of this RFI let us assume that 80 percent of
the locations in each of the five metropolitan areas will require full
functionality at an engineering, development and analysis level, ten
percent will be engineering support users and the last 10 percent will
be management support.  The operating system software as
a goal will be a standard commercial product in current widespread use.
 Implementing your recommendations -- -what type of unique
code must be written to integrate system/software capabilities. 8.
Engineering and Professional Support Professional and engineering
services are key in our planning and it would be extremely beneficial
if you could provide some reference information in this area.
 What is the expected time to deploy your recommendation in
an operational configuration with all the described capabilities.
 All hardware must be maintainable at each of the
locations. Some instances will require immediate support should
problems occur, others might not need priority support. 
What level of engineering services would be required to support
recurring system maintenance/configuration management? This would
include adding and/or upgrading new facilities and equipment,
performing accuracy validation, and providing assistance with
scenarios/assessment production. All information received will be
safeguarded from unauthorized disclosure. Please ensure any sensitive
or proprietary information is clearly marked as such. This is not a
solicitation announcement for proposals and no contract will be awarded
from this announcement. No reimbursements will be made for any costs
associated with providing information in response to this announcement
and/or any follow-up information requests. We wish to use this as an
open forum for assisting us in developing our strategic vision. As such
product demonstration can be coordinated and telephone conferences can
be arranged. Lastly, we wish to reiterate this is not a formal
solicitation under FAR Part 14 or 15; however, it is anticipated that
only those firms responding to this RFI will be invited to participate
in any acquisition that may result from this RFI. Our Technology point
of contact is Bill Schupp, (321) 730-6239. Send all information to his
attention at 740 Central Control Rd. Bldg. 34705, CCAFS PAFB, FL
32925-2105 Posted 05/01/00 (W-SN450226). (0122) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0033 20000503\D-0014.SOL)
D - Automatic Data Processing and Telecommunication Services Index Page
|
|