|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 23,2000 PSA#2628Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, AFRL -- Rome
Research Site, AFRL/Information Directorate, 26 Electronic Parkway,
Rome, NY, 13441-4514 A -- AFFORDABLE MOVING SURFACE TARGET ENGAGEMENT II (AMSTE II) SOL
Reference-Number-PRDA-00-05-IFKPA POC Joetta Bernhard, Contracting
Officer, Phone (315) 330-2308, Fax (315) 330-7790, Email
bernhard@rl.af.mil WEB: Visit this URL for the latest information about
this,
http://www.eps.gov/cgi-bin/WebObjects/EPS?ACode=P&ProjID=Reference-Num
ber-PRDA-00-05-IFKPA&LocID=1142. E-MAIL: Joetta Bernhard,
bernhard@rl.af.mil. Points of Contact: Stephen Welby, DARPA Program
Manager, (703) 248-1545, email swelby@darpa.mil; Jon S. Jones, AFRL
Program Manager, (315) 330-1665, email jonesj@rl.af.mil; Joetta A.
Bernhard, Contracting Officer, (315) 330-2308, email
bernhard@rl.af.mil. The DARPA Special Projects Office (SPO) and the Air
Force Research Laboratory Information Directorate, Information and
Intelligence Exploitation Division are seeking firms to conduct
research and development of innovative concepts and techniques for the
engagement of moving surface targets. The overall objective of the
Affordable Moving Surface Target Engagement (AMSTE) program is to
develop, integrate and demonstrate system technologies required for the
precision engagement of moving surface threats from long range, to
maintain positive track on these targets and to rapidly engage these
moving targets with stand-off weapons. Characteristics of AMSTE System:
Key characteristics of the operational AMSTE system include:
all-weather engagement; rapid, high-confidence targeting; and precision
engagement. An all-weather engagement capability requires a radar
solution, nominally a fusion of ground moving target indication (GMTI)
and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) modes. AMSTE targeting requires the
ability to maintain threat track from initial target nomination through
engagement. This implies robust extended-duration tracking approaches,
perhaps using signature aided tracking techniques to disambiguate
movers and maintain combat identification. Improved Battle Management
Command, Control, and Communications (BM/C3) techniques and processes
are required to coordinate and control the multiple elements needed to
prosecute moving targets in a dynamic environment. This encompasses
the algorithms and logic required to advance a target through the kill
chain seamlessly, without creating an unrealistic operator workload.
Precision engagement implies netted sensors and weapons to provide
selectivity in engagement and end-game accuracy. Netted sensors are
also critical for high confidence, long duration target tracking.
Incorporation of the weapon into the engagement net implies a weapon
concept that uses fire-control aim-point updates from the sensor
network during its fly-out to achieve desired engagement accuracies
against a maneuvering target. Improving end-game accuracy will maximize
lethality and minimize collateral damage. Operation at long range with
standoff weapons is required for system survivability. Overall Program
Approach: The technologies needed to implement an AMSTE GMTI fire
control system have matured to the point where they are ready to be
integrated into an experimental system. These technologies, noted
later, require integration at both the subsystem and system levels;
i.e., platform integration and networking, to implement a system
capable of field experimentation. AMSTE II, the subject of this PRDA,
will develop such an AMSTE system capability and will perform basic
field-testing and experimentation across a range of scenario conditions
with this system. Two key elements recognized during the course of
AMSTE I as requiring significant research and development were
signature-aided tracking, which is needed for long duration, high
confidence tracking, and advanced BM/C3, which is needed to match
action/decision cycles with the dynamics of moving target engagement.
It is expected that participants in AMSTE II will address both of these
technical challenges within the course of this program. PRDA Goal: The
purpose of this PRDA (AMSTE II) is to develop and integrate the system
technologies into an experimental system that will be used to
demonstrate the feasibility and potential of the AMSTE concept. AMSTE
II is focused on the development of an advanced AMSTE capability and
the employment of this capability in a series of increasing realistic
system experiments. The AMSTE II contractor(s) are expected to develop
the critical technologies required by the AMSTE concept and integrate
them, as appropriate, into their experimental system. The system
experiments will assess and demonstrate the value and tactical
potential of a robust AMSTE system, identify the technological advances
that offer the highest payoff and explore the critical technical issues
associated with real-time precision fire control and high-confidence
engagement-quality tracking. While there may be multiple approaches to
solving the AMSTE problem, there is a set of common challenges that
must be addressed by any AMSTE solution. These include: multi-sensor
and weapon grid-locking and geo-registration, association, target
tracking and estimation using multiple sensors of varying metric
accuracy, update rates, viewing angles, and data links. Innovative
techniques are sought which exploit all potentially available sensor
and situational information including terrain-aided and target
feature-aided techniques. Additionally, it is expected the contractor
shall develop the algorithms to perform automated sensor,
communications, and weapons control as part of the AMSTE II program.
Data from field and other testing should, therefore, also support
tracking and targeting algorithm development and sensor mode
development. Especially sought are innovative system solutions to the
AMSTE problem, which are robust to natural interference sources and
enemy countermeasures, and represent a clear advancement to the
state-of-the-art in terms of both performance and cost. AMSTE II
participants will participate in a government led test working group,
which will be responsible for the development and maintenance of
experimentation and data collection plans to support the evaluation of
recommended concepts/techniques. AMSTE II will emphasize the use of
emerging sensor, weapon and platform technologies with modest or
minimal requirements for AMSTE-specific modifications or upgrades. This
implies the use of test bed sensors, weapons, communication, and low
cost seekers representative of systems that are expected to be in the
later stages of development by 2007. AMSTE will exploit recent advances
in the state of the art, including high-range-resolution GMTI, highly
accurate Global Positioning System/inertial navigation System (GPS/INS)
navigation and weapon guidance, and highly capable, low-cost computers,
to achieve improvements in engagement precision without requiring
concomitant investment in sensor or seeker capabilities. No new
platforms or weapons are desired, and the sensor net is expected to be
implemented as a specialized use of existing communications systems
such as JTIDS/Link 16. Experiment Descriptions: The yearly AMSTE II
experiments are defined by the following themes: FY01 -- Airborne
experimentation demonstrating precision fire control and weapon
delivery with limited target association challenges (Part I of PRDA).
FY02 -- Airborne experimentation demonstrating integrated
high-reliability track maintenance and precision fire control (Part II
of PRDA). FY03 -- End-to-end field demonstration of AMSTE engagement
capabilities (planned -- not part of this PRDA). These experiments and
demonstrations will providea series of increasingly challenging
scenarios for moving target engagement. The principal focus of the
first year's experimentation is on exploring the issues of precision
fire control and accurate weapon delivery against moving and stopped
targets and will culminate in an actual guided weapon delivery against
a GFE target. The second year's experiments will increase the
complexity and density of the vehicle motion, and will require the
contractor to begin the engagement earlier in the kill chain. The
system will be expected to accept a target nomination of a specific
target, track the target for an extended period of time without losing
track or confusing its ID with that of another moving or stopped
vehicle, and transition this target into end-game fire control. The
principal focus of this second year is on expanding the portion of the
kill chain being addressed by the AMSTE II experimental system, and
exploring the issues with long duration, high confidence target
tracking and the impact of mis-associations on end-game accuracy. The
first two years of experiments will be highly scripted so that sensor
and weapon platforms can be pre-positioned in appropriate orbits, modes
correctly set, and sensor, communications, weapons, tracking algorithms
are correctly initialized. The third year of experimentation, which is
planned but is not part of this PRDA, is expected to be unscripted,
where the contractor is expected to demonstrate an end-to-end AMSTE
capability in a military exercise-like scenario. This experiment would
therefore stress the need for automation in sensor mode control,
multi-sensor communications, weapon delivery platform control, and
weapon data links. It is expected that each experiment will include
live weapons drop(s) on moving targets. The FY01 and FY02 experiments
provide an opportunity to exercise the AMSTE II capability in a
government-defined, realistic field environment. These experiments are
intended to validate and extend prior performance analysis. It is
expected that program participants will conduct analyses, simulations,
and range tests in preparation for these experiments. In addition, the
contractor may perform additional field-testing, laboratory testing and
simulation to evaluate alternate AMSTE approaches and/or to evaluate
the capability in a wider range of environments or conditions. These
experiments will also provide the contractor the opportunity to collect
data for ongoing and future technology development required for the
next year's experiments. Due to the diverse nature of the technologies
and activities involved in AMSTE II (platforms, sensors, data links,
tracking algorithms, weapons, BMC3, system integration, flight testing,
etc) the government encourages the use of contractor teams to integrate
best-in-class capabilities into an AMSTE solution. Technical Goals: The
goal of this PRDA is to establish technologies to allow rapid, high
confidence, selective targeting and precision engagement of moving
surface targets in all weather. The numeric goal for weapon delivery
accuracy is 10 meters, independent of the operation of any end-game
seeker. For systems that employ a seeker, the numeric goal is 3 meters.
The numeric goal for high-confidence targeting is to correctly maintain
track of a set of targets, without losing their identification, for a
period in excess of 20 minutes. This should be accomplished in varying
levels of scenario complexity, including cases for which kinematics
alone is insufficient to resolve targets, and cases that involve
move-stop cycles. While there is no simple metric that defines the
quality of the end-to-end system, it is expected that the contractor
will demonstrate a system that can seamlessly transition through the
steps in an engagement, from target nomination through weapon on
target, without significant operator workload. Program Reviews:
Quarterly program reviews (QPRs) shall be conducted to track technical,
financial and schedule performance and risk. Additional technical
meetings may be required for coordination and planning. An
ExperimentDesign Review (EDR) shall be conducted approximately three
months before the beginning of each yearly experiment. The EDR shall be
the decision point for entering into any flight or range experiment.
The EDR shall describe the experiment objective, scope, conditions,
test assets, test approach, instrumentation, and data analysis plans.
It is expected that performers will provide monthly status reporting
and a comprehensive technical performance report on a semi-annual
basis. Government Furnished Equipment (GFE): The Government intends to
arrange for range support for the three years of experimentation,
including range instrumentation and remotely controlled targets for
weapon delivery testing. It is expected that the targets for the track
maintenance testing and the precision fire control testing would be
representative of AMSTE threats or suitable emulation of these vehicle
types. While the Government reserves the right to provide sensor
platforms, weapon platforms, communication equipment, and/or weapons,
the contractor should not anticipate or depend upon these being GFE.
The contractor should include in their proposal their recommended
approach, including the specific sensor, communication equipment,
weapon platforms, and weapons, they intend to modify and use and the
cost to acquire, modify, and when required, de-modify these assets. It
is anticipated that Part I of this PRDA will have two (2) awards, with
a period of 12 months, which culminates with the FY01 experiment
described previously. Awards of efforts as a result of this PRDA will
be in the form of contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or other
transactions depending upon the nature of the work proposed. Awards for
Part I are expected O/A 15 October 2000. Work to be performed may
require SECRET/NOFORN facility clearance and safeguarding capability.
Therefore, personnel identified for assignment to a classified effort
must be cleared for access to SECRET/NOFORN information at the time of
award. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONSTITUTES THE ONLY SOLICITATION. PROPOSALS
ARE REQUESTED. Offerors are required to submit an original and (5)
copies of their proposal (technical and cost) to AFRL/IFEM, ATTN: Jon
Jones, 32 Brooks Road, Rome, NY 13441-4114 by 30 August 2000 not later
than 4:00PM, EDT. Technical proposals are limited to a total page
count of seventy-five (75) pages and shall be double-spaced with a font
no smaller than 12 pitch. The technical proposal shall include the FY01
experiment and the FY02 experiment. The cost proposal for the FY01
effort (the initial contract) must be a full cost proposal as described
in the Proposal Preparation Instructions. The costs for the FY02 effort
should be a ROM based on the Cost Element Summary found in the Proposal
Preparation Instructions following the Cost Proposal Table of Contents.
An unclassified briefing for all interested firms will be held on 29
June 2000, at AFRL/IF, Bldg 106, 26 Electronic Parkway, Rome, NY
13441-4514 at 0900 hours. A briefing package, including complete
instructions for proposal preparation, will be made available to all
attendees. Please contact Jon S. Jones at (315) 330-1665, or e-mail
jonesj@rl.af.mil, not later than 28 June 2000 if you plan to attend.
Firms who do not attend the briefing, but desire to have a copy of the
material should provide their firm name, point of contact, complete
address, phone number, FAX number, and e-mail address to Joetta
Bernhard at (315) 330-2308 or e-mail to: bernhard@rl.af.mil not later
than 30 June 2000. Alternatively, the briefing and instructions may be
obtained at the following Web address:
http://www.if.afrl.af.mil/div/IFK/prda/prda-main.html, then scrolling
down to PRDA 00-05-IFKPA. The previously cited Web site is also
available to answer technical program and contractual questions. This
site will be available to post questions for one week after the
bidder's briefing. Responses will be posted to the web site within 48
hours after collection, providing time for the presenter to organize
the response. This allows for anonymous questions. Evaluation of
proposals will be accomplished using the following criteria: (l)
overall scientific and technical merit, (2) potential contribution and
relevance to this effort, (3) innovativeness of the proposed approach
and/or techniques, (4) offeror's capabilities and related experience,
and (5) cost realism and reasonableness. In addition, the Government
will consider other factors, such as past and present performance on
recent Government contracts and the capacity to perform the
requirements of the effort. On 1 Jul 01, the cost and technical
proposals for Part II of the PRDA will be required. Part II of the PRDA
will have one (1) award with a period of 12 months, culminating with
the FY02 experiment described previously. Part II of the PRDA will be
open to all offerors, not just the Part I award winners. The Government
will select the contractor for Part II based on the following criteria:
(1) progress towards the second-year experiment, (2) overall scientific
and technical merit and (3) cost realism and reasonableness. The total
value for all awards under this PRDA shall not exceed $49,700,000.
Foreign participation at the prime contractor level is not authorized
for this acquisition. The cost of preparing proposals in response to
this announcement is not an allowable direct charge to any resulting
contract or any other contract, but may be an allowable expense to the
normal bid and proposal indirect cost in FAR 31.205-18. An Ombudsman
has been appointed to hear significant concerns from offerors or
potential offerors during the proposal development phase of this
acquisition. Routine questions are not considered to be "significant
concerns" and should be communicated directly to the Contracting
Officer, Joetta A. Bernhard, (315) 330-2308. The purpose of the
Ombudsman is not to diminish the authority of the Contracting Officer
or Program Manager, but to communicate contractor concerns, issues,
disagreements and recommendations to the appropriate Government
personnel. The Ombudsman for this acquisition is Vincent Palmiero,
Chief, Policy and Management Division, AFRL/IFK at (315) 330-7746. When
requested, the Ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the
source of the concern. The Ombudsman does not participate in the
evaluation of the proposals or in the source selection process. This
PRDA is open and effective until 31 October 2000. To receive a copy of
the AFRL "BAA & PRDA: A Guide for Industry," Sep 1996 (Rev), write
ATTN: Debra Cutler, AFRL/IFK, 26 Electronics Parkway, Rome, NY
13441-4514, or fax her at FAX 315-330-1795, or the guide may be
accessed at: http://www.if.afrl.af.mil/div/IFK/bp-guide.html. All
responsible firms may submit proposals, which shall be considered.
Respondents are asked to provide their Commercial and Government Entity
(CAGE) number with their proposal(s) and reference PRDA 00-05-IFKPA.
Only Contracting Officers are legally authorized to commit the
Government. Posted 06/21/00 (D-SN467085). (0173) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0007 20000623\A-0007.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|