COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 19,2000 PSA#2645 Naval Medical Logistics Command, Code 02, 521 Fraim Street, Ft.
Detrick, MD 21702-5015 65 -- DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND SOL N62645-00-R-0015 DUE 080100 POC Donna
R. Blackstone, Contracting Officer (301) 619-2062 WEB: asp,
http://www-nmlc.med.navy.mil/Code02/rfp.asp. E-MAIL: html,
DRBlackstone@US.med.navy.mil. The Naval Medical Logistics Command has
a requirement for diagnostic ultrasound units for Medical Treatment
Facilities worldwide. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for
commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart
12.6, as supplement with additional information included in this
notice and as posted on our website. This announcement constitutes the
only solicitation document; proposals are being requested and a
written solicitation will not be issued. Responses must contain
sufficient documentation to establish a bonafide capability to fulfill
the requirements. The solicitation document and incorporated
provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition
Circular 97-18. The solicitation number is N62645-00-R-0015 and is
issued as a request for proposal. The solicitation may be found on the
NMLC home page at http://www-nmlc.med.navy.mil/Code02/rfp.htm
approximately on 18 July 2000. The Navy is committed to a paperless
acquisition process. Definite delivery and quantity is unknown. One or
more Requirements type contract(s) will be awarded. Delivery may be
worldwide and will be identified within the issued delivery order. The
Diagnostic Ultrasound system shall meet or exceed the following
salient characteristics: 1)Unit shall consist of a system capable of
providing digital anatomical imaging for abdominal, vascular,
obstetrical, gynecological, and small parts applications. 2) The system
shall be in compliance with the following standards: a) American
Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) RTD-Standard for Real Time
Display of Thermal & Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic
Ultrasound Equipment. b) AIUM/NEMA acoustic output measurement and
labeling standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment. AOM 1992. c)
ANSI/AAMI HE48-Human Factors Engineering Guidelines. d) Digital Imaging
and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Standard. 3) Shall have the
capability for digital Doppler imaging with color flow mapping. 4)
Shall operate in B-Mode, M-Mode, and simultaneous B-Mode/M-Mode. 5)
Shall have adjustable transmit and dynamic receive focus. 6) Shall have
the digital image archive and cine image storage capability. 7) Shall
have cardiac, vascular, and OB/GYN analysis packages. 8) Shall have
digital calipers to measure the length, area, circumference, or volume
of a structure. 9) Shall have image zoom and freeze frame capability.
10) Shall include a monitor to display images, measurements, and scan
parameters and shall have the capability of printing hardcopy images
to either film or paper. 11) Shall have a data entry keyboard to permit
the entry of patient information to be displayed along with the scanned
image. 12) Shall have nominal external dimensions consistent with
portable requirements for shared utilization within or across
healthcare facilities. 13) Shall be designed to accommodate future
upgrades. The following provisions and clauses apply to this
acquisition: FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors Commercial Items
(9/99); FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Commercial Items (1/99) as explained
below; FAR 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications
Commercial Items (2/2000) (a completed copy of this must accompany any
offer); 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions Commercial Items
(3/99). Additionally FAR 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions
Required to Implement Statues or Executive Orders Commercial Items
(2/00) applies as follows: 52.22-3, Convict Labor (8/96); 52.225-13,
Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchase (2/2000); 52.233-3, Protest
After Award (8/96); 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities
(2-99); 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (2/2000); 52.222-35, Affirmative
Action for Disabled Veterans and Veterans of the Vietnam Era (4/98);
52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (6/98);
52.232-3 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer Central Contractor
Registration (5/99). The Government will award one or more contract(s)
resulting from this solicitation to the offeror whose proposal
represents the greatest value to the Government in terms of quality and
price. Quality, for this requirement, is expressed as technical
capability that must be demonstrated in each offeror's technical
proposal. Technical considerations, while of greater importance than
price considerations, does not preclude the offered price from being
considered fair and reasonable to be eligible for award. Proposal shall
be submitted into cost proposals and technical proposals. Technical
proposals shall include any information the offerer wishes considered
necessary to determine the relative merits of their proposal, with the
information subsectioned behind the appropriate evaluation factors, as
per the technical evaluation factors listed below. Any information that
is not located behind the appropriate tab may not be considered.
Information shall be provided such that it is clearly indicated as to
what factor or factors the information applies. Offers shall be
evaluated in a three (3) stage process. The first stage shall be binary
(acceptable/ unacceptable). In accordance with FAR 52.212-4 the
following evaluation factors apply: FACTOR 1: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. The
offeror has successfully demonstrated compliance with all of the
minimum performance and/or design requirements contained in the
solicitation. This factor will be evaluated on a
ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE basis. An offeror may be rated UNACCEPTABLE AS
SUBMITTED if the proposal has not demonstrated compliance with all
minimum requirements but has the potential to do so if amended during
discussions. Offerors are cautioned that the Government intends to
award without discussions, so proposals deemed UNACCEPTABLE AS
SUBMITTED may not be considered for award. Proposals deemed
UNACCEPTABLE will not be evaluated in Factors 2 and 3. FACTOR 2:
TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT. The extent to which the offeror's proposal
reflects acceptable technical risk for the government will be evaluated
in this factor. Technical risk considerations are those characteristics
of the equipment that permit safe and effective use in the designated
environment. They are design features, human factors, and ease of
maintainability. Human factors engineering is the application of
knowledge about human capabilities and limitations to system or
equipment design and development. Technical proposals must include
sufficiently detailed information to enable evaluation based on the
three (3) factors listed in order of decreasing priority: Design
Features, Human Factors, Maintainability. FACTOR 3: PERFORMANCE RISK
ASSESSMENT. The extent to which the offeror's proposal reflects an
appropriate apportionment of performance risk will be evaluated in this
factor. Performance risk considerations are defined as those
characteristics of the offeror that give indication of the likelihood
of the offeror's successful performance of the current requirement.
They are proposed delivery schedule, record of on-time delivery for
same class product, quality of workmanship displayed in same class
delivered product, reliability of same class delivered product,
business relations exhibited during previous contracts, range and depth
of support provided for same class delivered product. All responsible
sources may submit a proposal that shall be considered by the Navy.
Proposals may be submitted by mail, email
(DRBlackstone@US.med.navy.mil) or fax. Proposals are due by 3 p.m. on
1 August 2000 at Naval Medical Logistics Command, Attn: Code 022 (Donna
Blackstone), 521 Fraim Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702-5015. Fax (301)
619-6793; email DRBlackstone@US.med.navy.mil. Contract Specialist:
Donna Blackstone (301) 619-2062. Posted 07/17/00 (W-SN475726). (0199) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0298 20000719\65-0005.SOL)
| 65 - Medical, Dental and Veterinary Equipment and Supplies Index
|
Issue Index |
Created on July 17, 2000 by Loren Data Corp. --
info@ld.com
|
|
|