|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 2,1999 PSA#2380Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Procurement
Operations Branch, MS2500, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, Virginia
20170-4817 D -- IMODEL LEASING SIMULATION PROGRAM SOL 1435-01-99-RP-16091 DUE
072199 POC Dotty Quinn, Contracting Officer, (703) 787-1365 This notice
is a combined synopsis/request for quotation for a commercial item in
accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 13 and Subpart
12.6. This announcement constitutes the only request; quotations are
being requested and a written Request for Quotations will not be
issued. This acquisition is a 100% set aside for Small Business. The
Government estimates the effort at 6 months and cost estimated of
$50,000 to $100,000. PLEASE READ THIS ENTIRE NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT
CONSTITUTES THE ONLY NOTICE THAT WILL BE ISSUED. PROJECT: Upgrade
existing IMODEL leasing simulation program. TASKS: 1. Rewrite the
IMODEL simulation program in C++ programming language. 2. Ensure that
changes in minimum bid levels are being addressed appropriately within
the model. 3. Provide technical documentation and a revised user's
guide for IMODEL. The upgraded system must be Y2K compliant. Contractor
must provide a Y2K compliance certification with the system
documentation. INTRODUCTION: Among Minerals Management Service's (MMS)
responsibilities is the periodic estimation of bonus bids likely to be
generated by Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) gas and oil lease sales as
well as the evaluation of alternative leasing systems, including the
provisions of the Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (DWRRA) of 1995. In
response to these responsibilities, the MMS conducts analysis that
assists in the development of bonus revenue estimates and examines the
effects of alternative leasing systems and royalty relief options as
applied to specific lease sales. OBJECTIVE: The major analytical tool
used by the MMS in developing bonus revenue estimates and evaluating
the effects of alternative leasing systems is the IMODEL leasing
simulation program. In projecting bonus receipts, IMODEL allows the MMS
to simulate the potential response of the oil industry to proposed
schedules of OCS gas and oil lease sales. For the sales within a
proposed schedule, IMODEL estimates the number of tracts that could be
acquired and the bonus that will be received in each sale, based on
the geological and economic assumptions specified by the MMS. These
estimates form the basis of the agency=s bonus forecasts. In examining
alternative leasing systems, IMODEL can simulate the potential effects
of changes in leasing parameters from values that traditionally are
used in OCS lease sales. IMODEL aids the MMS in studying potential
effects (relative to a set of baseline lease terms and conditions) of
changes in minimum bid level, rental rate, length of lease term, and
royalty rate, either singly or combined, on bidding activity in a sale.
The original IMODEL simulation program was developed more than ten
years ago. Although IMODEL has withstood the test of time and continues
to be a valuable analytical tool, modification of the model is needed
to meet evolving needs. This contract will allow for the improvement of
IMODEL by incorporation of features to refine and expand the capability
available in the program. BACKGROUND: IMODEL consists of about 10,000
lines of code (excluding comments), of which about 6,000 lines are in
FORTRAN and 4,000 lines are in C. Some of the FORTRAN code is unchanged
from the original version of IMODEL (1984-85) and most of the C code
dates from the creation of the Windows interface in 1993-94. Recoding
the program will provide the opportunity to make some overdue
structural changes including the use of Aobject-oriented programming@
features of C++. This will enable large data structures to be handled
more efficiently within the model. The goal of the recoding is to make
the code simpler, more modular and more transparent, so that any
future revisions to the model would be simpler to implement. The IMODEL
simulation program is game theoretic. It represents the bidding process
as a non-cooperative game among an uncertain number of bidders each
with private information. Two key parameters are set by the user: the
expected number of bidders and a parameter related to the amount of
private information available to each bidder. One limitation is that
these parameters must have the same value for all tracts in a sale
segment. Another key determinant of tract value, the success
probability, is also set by the user and must be the same for all
tracts in a sale segment. Revising the bidding model will provide the
basis for evaluating the soundness of the current model and provide the
opportunity to make changes in the specification of bidding parameters,
as appropriate. TASK 1. Rewrite in C++ Programming Language. Rewrite
the IMODEL simulation program in C++ to allow the program to function
more effectively in a Windows operating environment. TASK 2.
Sensitivity of Bids to Changes in Minimum Bid Levels. Ensure that
changes in minimum bid levels are being addressed appropriately within
the model, especially as they apply to bid formulation. The contractor
will provide an option within the model that allows the user to limit
the field size classes that respond to changes in minimum bid levels.
TASK 3. Technical Documentation. Provide technical documentation and a
revised user's guide for IMODEL that explains the features developed
in Tasks 1 and 2. REPORTS AND DELIVERABLES: 1. Progress Reports. Send
monthly progress reports to the COTR by the 15th of each month during
the contract. The progress reports shall include: a summary of work
performed in the preceding month and correspondence to the schedule in
the approved work plan; a summary of problems encountered and
solutions proposed; and a description of any other actions that could
affect the successful completion of the contract. 2. Draft Work Plan.
Within 15 days of contract award, the Contractor shall meet with the
Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) and provide a
written Draft Work Plan that describes how the tasks will be
accomplished. The COTR will provide the Contractor by telephone
comments on the plan (with follow-up in writing) within 5 days. The
review will be completed and the Contractor contacted no later than 20
days after the effective date of the contract. 3. Final Work Plan.
Final Work Plan that responds to the review comments on the Draft Work
Plan. The Final Work Plan shall be submitted within 30 days of
contract award. 4. Draft Computer Program and Technical Documentation.
Within four months of contract award, the Contractor shall submit to
the COTR a working computer program incorporating the modifications in
Tasks 1 and 2 as well as draft technical documentation. At that time
the MMS will have 30 days to test the program and suggest revisions.
Agreed upon revisions will be incorporated in the upgraded version of
IMODEL. 5. Final Computer Program and Technical Documentation. Within
six months of contract award, the Contractor shall provide the final,
upgraded version of IMODEL and the associated technical documentation
and user's guide. The upgraded version of IMODEL shall be provided on
3.5 inch microdisks, capable of running in IBM-compatible computers.
The technical documentation and user's guide shall be provided as a
printed report as well as computer files either in Microsoft Word
orCorel WordPerfect. HOW TO RESPOND: In order to compete for this
project, interested parties must demonstrate that they are qualified to
perform the work by providing before 4:00 PM, ET, July 21, 1999, a
brief Capabilities Statement and Cost Proposal. Capabilities Statement
detailing: 1. key personnel (those who would have the primary
responsibility for performing and/or managing the project) with their
qualifications and specific experience; 2. your organization=s
experience with programming and developing simulation models and a
description of your facilities; and 3. past performance with specific
references (including project identifier/ contract number and
description, period of performance, dollar amount, client name and
current telephone number) for work of this nature that your personnel
or organization is currently performing or has completed within the
last year. Include any negative references and your rebuttal explaining
your side of the story. All references will be checked to validate the
information provided. Cost Proposal citing the price for Task 1, 2,
and 3. Offerors shall submit an original and five copies of
Capabilities Statements and Cost Proposal to Ms. Dotty Quinn,
Contracting Officer, Minerals Management Service, Procurement
Operations Branch, 381 Elden St., MS 2510, Herndon, VA 20170-4817. Your
Capabilities Statement will be evaluated based on the following: 1. the
skills, abilities, education, professional credentials and experience
of proposed key personnel; 2. the experience of your organization,
including number, size, location of projects, and complexity of similar
projects completed by the proposed project team and your organization
to determine your potential for success and contract award; and 3. the
past performance of your organization, including adherence to
schedules and budgets, effectiveness of cost control, the acceptability
of previous products delivered, effectiveness of program management,
and the offeror=s willingness to cooperate with the customer in both
routine matters and when confronted by unexpected difficulties. Cost
Proposal based on Task 1, 2, and 3 for best value. Following review of
all Capabilities Statements and Cost Proposals received, those firms
judged most qualified to successfully perform the effort and best value
may be asked to provide an oral presentation during the week of August
2, 1999. The oral presentation will be 45 minutes or less and must be
given by a key person assigned to this project rather than corporate
sales or executive personnel who will not work on the project. The
government will evaluate each oral presentation to determine the most
effective firm, including schedule, coordination, options, technology,
testing and methodology and best value. There will be a question and
answer session lasting 45 minutes following each presentation. Oral
presentations will take place in Herndon, VA. Each firm invited to
provide an oral presentation must submit the following documents by 4
PM, ET, August 2, 1999: (1) a written oral presentation summary in
bullet form; and (2) a project plan. The evaluation criteria are equal
in value and a best value analysis will determine which offeror will
receive the award. Price to perform the basic work will be evaluated
along with other factors. The following provisions Federal Acquisition
Regulations clauses are incorporated by reference: FAR 52.212-3,
Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items (MAY 99),
52.212-4 (MAY 99), 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to
Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items (MAY 99). In
accordance with FAR 39.106 the software shall be certified to be year
2000 compliant. Offerors can retrieve these clauses on the INTERNET at
www.gsa.gov/far or obtain a hard copy of the clauses by faxing a
request to Ms. Dotty Quinn on (703) 787-1387, or e-mail to
dotty.quinn@mms.gov. Questions about this requirement must be in
writing and submitted by fax or e-mail. Telephone inquiries are
strongly discouraged. All inquiries must include the RFQ number, your
full name, organization name, address, phone and fax numbers and be
received before July 16, 1999, noon. It is the responsibility of the
offeror to ensure the Capabilities Statement and written presentation
summary, schedule and pricing are received before the date/time shown
above. Small Disadvantaged Business Regulatory Change Notice: The
Federal Acquisition Regulation authorizes the use of price and
evaluation credits in industries where SDB prime contractors and
subcontractors have been underutilized. We ask that you inform your SDB
subcontractors that they should contact SBA's Office of Certification
and Eligibility at 800-558-0884 to obtain an application, or to log on
to SBA/s Website (www.sba.gov.sdb). If you are an SDB prime contractor
who is not SBA-certified, we also ask that you apply for certification.
Effective October 1, 1998, certified SDB prime contractors were
eligible for a price credit when bidding on Federal prime contracts.
Effective January 1, 1999, prime contractors who subcontract with
SBA-certified or self-certified SDBs are eligible for evaluation
credits. Please note that prime contractors may continue to rely on
self-certification of their SDB subcontractors through October 1, 1999.
For solicitations issued on or after October 2, 1999, prime contractors
must use SDB-certified SDB subcontractors in order to be eligible for
evaluation credits. Posted 06/30/99 (W-SN349131). (0181) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0026 19990702\D-0006.SOL)
D - Automatic Data Processing and Telecommunication Services Index Page
|
|